Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Phonepe Private Limited vs Telegram Fz Llc
2025 Latest Caselaw 2218 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2218 Mad
Judgement Date : 29 January, 2025

Madras High Court

Phonepe Private Limited vs Telegram Fz Llc on 29 January, 2025

Author: Abdul Quddhose
Bench: Abdul Quddhose
                                  C.S. (Comm.Div.) No.218 of 2024, O.A. Nos.839 & 840 of 2024 and A.Nos.5627 to 5629 of 2024

                                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                            DATED : 29.01.2025

                                                                    CORAM

                                     THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

                                            C.S. (Comm.Div.) No.218 of 2024, O.A. Nos.
                                         839 & 840 of 2024 and A.Nos.5627 to 5629 of 2024

                     PhonePe Private Limited                                                       .. Plaintiff

                                                                        -vs-

                     1.Telegram FZ LLC

                     2.Ashok Kumar                                                                 .. Defendants

                     Prayer: Civil Suit has been filed under Order IV Rule 1 of the Original Side
                     Rules read with Order VII Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, Sections 27 to
                     29, 134 & 135 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and Section 7 of the
                     Commercial Courts Act to grant a judgment and decree on the following
                     terms:
                                  a)Permanent injunction restraining the defendants its directors,
                     officers, agents, employees, legal representatives, successors-in-interest,
                     assigns and any other person(s) acting on its behalf, as well as any person,
                     anonymous or pseudonymous users operating on the first defendant
                     platform, their successors, agents, representatives, assigns or anyone
                     claiming through or under them from infringing plaintiff's registered
                     trademark by developing, distributing, hosting or enabling the hosting,
                     marketing, selling, offering for sale, advertising or otherwise dealing in any

                     1/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                  C.S. (Comm.Div.) No.218 of 2024, O.A. Nos.839 & 840 of 2024 and A.Nos.5627 to 5629 of 2024

                     APK, mobile application or product that bears a deceptively similar mark,
                     name or label to the plaintiff's registered trademarks in any manner
                     whatsoever;

                                  b)Mandatory injunction directing the first defendant including its
                     directors, officers, agents, employees, legal representatives, successors-in-
                     interest, assigns and any other person(s) acting on its behalf to block,
                     disable or remove the channels, accounts and content specified in Schedule
                     A of the Plaint, as well as any other present or future channels, accounts or
                     content that infringe or are connected to the plaintiff's registered trademarks
                     or that promote, distribute or offer for sale any APKs or applications
                     deceptively similar to the plaintiff's trademarks;


                                  c)Permanent injunction restraining the defendants its directors,
                     officers, agents, employees, legal representatives, successors-in-interest,
                     assigns and any other person(s) acting on its behalf, as well as any person,
                     anonymous or pseudonymous users operating on the first defendant
                     platform, their successors, agents, representatives, assigns or anyone
                     claiming through or under them from hosting, distributing, marketing,
                     selling, offering for download or otherwise disseminating any APK files,
                     mobile applications or digital goods and the content specified in Schedule B
                     of the Plaint and from engaging in any similar present or future acts of
                     hosting, distributing, promoting or making available for download any APK
                     files or digital goods that bear, incorporate or use marks deceptively similar
                     to the plaintiffs registered trademarks or that otherwise misappropriate the
                     plaintiff's intellectual property;

                     2/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                  C.S. (Comm.Div.) No.218 of 2024, O.A. Nos.839 & 840 of 2024 and A.Nos.5627 to 5629 of 2024

                                  d)Permanent injunction restraining the second defendant as well as
                     any person, anonymous or pseudonymous users operating on the first
                     defendant platform, their successors, agents, representatives, assigns or
                     anyone claiming through or under them from impersonating the plaintiff or
                     misrepresenting themselves as being associated with or authorized by the
                     plaintiff in any manner, whether by using the plaintiff's name, logo,
                     trademarks or any other identifying mark deceptively similar to that of the
                     plaintiff from collecting money, soliciting payments or receiving any
                     financial benefit from the public, vendors or third parties under the false
                     pretence that they are associated with or acting on behalf of the plaintiff or
                     engaging in any fraudulent, deceptive or misleading activities designed to
                     cheat or deceive vendors, users or the general public through the sale,
                     promotion or distribution of fake or counterfeit APKs, mobile applications
                     or any other digital goods falsely claiming association with the plaintiff or
                     operating, administering or managing any websites, digital platforms, social
                     media accounts or any other online or offline means that facilitate the
                     aforementioned deceptive practices, either directly or indirectly;


                                  e)Declare the plaintiff's registered mark 'PhonePe' as wellknown
                     Trademark under Section 2 (1) (zg) read with Section 11 of the Trade Marks
                     Act, 1999 and issue consequently directions to appropriate authorities;
                                  f)Direct the defendants jointly and/or severally pay to the plaintiff as
                     compensatory and punitive damages a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- for the acts of
                     infringement of trademark committed by them;
                                  g) An order as to costs of the proceedings.


                     3/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                  C.S. (Comm.Div.) No.218 of 2024, O.A. Nos.839 & 840 of 2024 and A.Nos.5627 to 5629 of 2024




                                         For plaintiff            : Mr.P.Giridharan


                                         For D1                   : Mr.Thriyambak J.Kannan


                                         For D2                   : exparte

                                                              JUDGMENT

As directed by this Court in its earlier order dated 20.01.2025,

Registry has printed the name of the second defendant in the cause list

today. On 20.01.2025, the substituted service effected on the second

defendant by the plaintiff through paper publication was taken on record.

Till date, no one has entered appearance on behalf of the second defendant.

Hence, the second defendant is set ex-parte by this Court.

2.Learned counsel for the plaintiff has made an endorsement in the

court bundle stating that as and when any infringing link or channel is

hosted on the first defendant's platform, on the plaintiff's request, the first

defendant shall take down the same and in terms of the said endorsement,

the suit may be decreed.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S. (Comm.Div.) No.218 of 2024, O.A. Nos.839 & 840 of 2024 and A.Nos.5627 to 5629 of 2024

3.Learned counsel for the first defendant, on instructions, agrees to

the same.

4.Accordingly, this suit is decreed by directing the first defendant to

remove the infringing content in the first defendant's platform as and when

the plaintiff intimates the first defendant about the same in respect of the

subject matter of the dispute. No costs. Consequently, connected

applications are closed.

29.01.2025 vga

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S. (Comm.Div.) No.218 of 2024, O.A. Nos.839 & 840 of 2024 and A.Nos.5627 to 5629 of 2024

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

vga

C.S. (Comm.Div.) No.218 of 2024, O.A. Nos. 839 & 840 of 2024 and A.Nos.5627 to 5629 of 2024

29.01.2025

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter