Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

R.T.Babu vs The Chairman
2025 Latest Caselaw 1930 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1930 Mad
Judgement Date : 22 January, 2025

Madras High Court

R.T.Babu vs The Chairman on 22 January, 2025

Author: R.Subramanian
Bench: R.Subramanian
                                                                              WP.No.108 of 2025


                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                              DATED : 22.01.2025

                                                   CORAM:

                                  THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
                                                    AND
                                  THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN

                                              WP No. 108 of 2025
                                                    and
                                              WMP No.128 of 2025
                  R.T.Babu
                                                                                 .... Petitioner
                                                      Vs
                  1. The Chairman,
                     State Level Scrutiny Committee
                     and Secretary,
                     Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department
                     Fort St. George, Chennai-9.
                  2. The Regional Manager,
                     Oriental Insurance Company Limited,
                     Regional Office, 3rd floor, Cheran Towers,
                     No.82, Government Arts College Road,
                     Coimbatore-18.
                                                                              .... Respondents


                  PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,

                  praying to issue a writ of Mandamus, forbearing the 1st respondent from

                  verifying the petitioner's community status in view of the petitioner's

                  retirement on 31.08.2022 and the 2nd respondent to forthwith release pension


                 1/7
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                  WP.No.108 of 2025


                  along with commutation, gratuity, earned leave encashment and other

                  admissible terminal benefits by duly confirming his services.


                                    For Petitioner   : Mr.V.Vijayashankar

                                    For Respondents : Mr.Vadivel Deenadayalan
                                                     Additional Government Pleader for R1
                                                      R2-No Appearance
                                                        *****

                                                       ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J]

The petitioner seeks a Mandamus restraining the State Level Scrutiny

Committee from conducting an enquiry into the communal status of the

petitioner.

2. The petitioner, who was favoured with the certificate to the effect

that he belongs to “Kondareddis” a Scheduled Tribe community on

12.09.1978 by the jurisdictional Tahsildar. The petitioner was appointed as a

General Insurance Marketing Trainee with the 2nd respondent-Insurance

Company on 29.07.1988. The certificate of the petitioner was sought to be

verified and the District Collector, Salem cancelled the certificate by order

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

dated 16.10.1999. The petitioner challenged the order of the District

Collector before the State Level Scrutiny Committee and a communication

was issued by the State Level Scrutiny Committee on 05.08.2005 requiring

the petitioner to appear for the hearing of the appeal against the order of the

District Collector. It is at this stage, the petitioner approached this Court

seeking a writ of Certiorari to quash the proceedings of the District Collector

dated 16.10.1999 [the cancellation] and the notice dated 05.08.2005 issued

by the State Level Scrutiny Committee. A Division Bench of this Court, by

its order dated 16.08.2005 allowed the writ petition, quashed the orders of

the District Collector and also terminated the proceedings before the State

Level Scrutiny Committee. Liberty was given to the appropriate Committee

to cause verification of the certificate issued to the petitioner. Complaining

that nothing happened thereafter, the petitioner is before us seeking the

mandamus as stated supra.

3. A status report has been filed by the Chairman of The State Level

Scrutiny Committee. It is stated therein that the employer sought for

verification of the Certificate on 19.12.2018 and the matter was forwarded to

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

the District Vigilance Cell, Salem and the enquiry report of the District

Vigilance Cell is awaited. The status report does not indicate as to whether

an enquiry has been commenced or not. A Division Bench of this Court even

while setting aside the earlier order of cancellation by the District Collector

as on 16.08.2005 given liberty to the State Level Committee to conduct the

verification. The same was not done. In the interregnum, the petitioner who

had rendered nearly 34 years of service was superannuated in August 2022.

In SLP.(C) No.24458 of 2019 dated 03.03.2023 [Union of India and

another Vs. S.Renuka and others], the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that

the exercise of verification after retirement would be only academic. The

Hon'ble Supreme Court also directed closure of the proceedings. We find

that this judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court was also followed by a

Division Bench of this Court in Manoharan Vs. Chairman, State Level

Scrutiny Committee [WP.No.12118 of 2023] and it was held that the conduct

of an enquiry after retirement would only be a wasteful exercise.

4. In view of the above, we see force in the contention of

Mr.V.Vijayashankar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that any

enquiry that is to be conducted will be only academic. We therefore find that

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

the petitioner is entitled to the relief as sought for.

5. This writ petition stands allowed. There will be a Mandamus

forbearing the first respondent from conducting any enquiry on the

communal status of the petitioner.

6. Despite service of notice, the Insurance Company is not appearing.

There will be a direction to the Insurance Company to disburse the retiral

benefits of the petitioner within a period of two(2) weeks from the date of

receipt of a copy of this order either from this Court or from the counsel for

the petitioner. If the retiral benefits are not paid over to the petitioner within

a period of two(2) weeks, the second respondent-Insurance Company will

pay interest on the retiral benefits at the rate of 24% per annum from the date

of retirement till the date of payment. The Insurance Company shall issue

appropriate confirmation order and payment.

7. Since the petitioner's certificate has not been verified, the

petitioner's legal heirs or blood relatives will not be entitled to the certificate

that they belonged to “Kondareddis”, a Scheduled Tribe community on the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

basis of the certificate issued to the petitioner. If they want to seek a

certificate to that effect, they will have to establish that they belonged to

“Kondareddis” a Scheduled Tribe community independent of the certificate

issued to the petitioner. No costs. Consequently, connected WMP is also

closed.

                                                                       [R.S.M., J]     [C.K., J]
                                                                               22.01.2025
                                                                                   (2/2)
                  Index           : No
                  Internet: Yes
                  Speaking Order
                  NCC : No
                  kmi
                  To
                  1. The Chairman,
                      State Level Scrutiny Committee
                      and Secretary,

Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department Fort St. George, Chennai-9.

2. The Regional Manager, Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Regional Office, 3rd floor, Cheran Towers, No.82, Government Arts College Road, Coimbatore-18.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

R.SUBRAMANIAN, J and C.KUMARAPPAN, J

kmi

22.01.2025 (2/2)

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter