Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1807 Mad
Judgement Date : 20 January, 2025
Crl.O.P(MD).No.360 of 2025
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 20.01.2025
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR
Crl.O.P(MD).No.360 of 2025
and Crl.M.P(MD) Nos.226 and 227 of 2025
1. Ravi
2. Muthuramalingam
3. Ramalingam
4. Kadambasamy
5. Subramani
6. Jayaram @ Sekar
7. Ponraj
8. Nedumaran
9. Jinnah @ Mohammed Ali Jinnad
10. Vellai @ Mari
11. Annamalai
12. Pari
13. Vairavan
14. Arivukarasu
15. Mari @ Aanamandai Mari
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/6
Crl.O.P(MD).No.360 of 2025
16. Pandiyan
17. Vanni
18. Murugan
19. Manikkam
20. Rajendran @ Alaguchellasamy
21. Arumugam
22. J.K.Alagendhiran
23. Raja
24. Illangovan
25. Balakrishnan
26. Ravi
27. Maarnadu
... Petitioners
Vs
The State of Tamil Nadu
Rep. by the Inspector of Police
Thirupuvanam Police Station
Thirupuvanam
Sivagangai District.
Crime No. 345/2011.
... Respondent
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
2/6
Crl.O.P(MD).No.360 of 2025
Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under section 528 of BNSS to
call for the records pertaining to S.T.C.No. 18/2019 on the file of District
Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Thiruppuvanam and quash the same as
against these petitioners.
For Petitioners : Mr. J.Anandkumar
For Respondent : Mr.A.Thiruvadi Kumar
Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the case
in S.T.C.No. 18 of 2019 on the file of District Munsif cum Judicial
Magistrate, Thiruppuvanam and quash the same as against these
petitioners.
2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and
the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents
and perused the materials available on record.
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would
submit that the facts of the case are exactly similar to the case covered in
the decision reported in 2018 2 LW (Crl) 606 [Jeevanandham and
others vs. The Inspector of Police Velayuthampalayam Police Station, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Karur District] dated 20.09.2018 and in the case of Sri Raja vs
Inspector of Police, Sivakasi Town Police Station Virudhunagar
District and other in batch of cases in Crl.O.P(MD) No.7922 of 2019
dated 30.08.2019.
3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the
respondent police would submit that the facts of the case are similar to
the facts covered under the Judgment referred above.
4.The facts of this case is similar to the facts covered by the
Judgment of this Court reported in 2018 2 LW (Crl) 606
[Jeevanandham and others vs. The Inspector of Police
Velayuthampalayam Police Station, Karur District] dated 20.09.2018
and in case of Sri Raja vs Inspector of Police, Sivakasi Town Police
Station Virudhunagar District and other in batch of cases in
Crl.O.P(MD) No.7922 of 2019 dated 30.08.2019.
5.Accordingly, the proceedings in S.T.C.No. 18/2019 on the
file of District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Thiruppuvanam is hereby
quashed insofar as the petitioners are concerned and the Criminal
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Original Petition is allowed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous
petitions are closed.
20.01.2025
NCC : Yes / No
Internet : Yes / No
Index : Yes / No
Speaking / Non Speaking order
PNM
To
1.The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Thiruppuvanam
2.The Inspector of Police Thirupuvanam Police Station Thirupuvanam Sivagangai District.
Crime No. 345/2011.
3. The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
M. NIRMAL KUMAR, J.
PNM
ORDER IN
and Crl.M.P(MD) Nos.226 and 227 of 2025
20.01.2025
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!