Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Varadarajan vs The Superintendent Of Prison
2025 Latest Caselaw 1752 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1752 Mad
Judgement Date : 17 January, 2025

Madras High Court

Varadarajan vs The Superintendent Of Prison on 17 January, 2025

Author: G.R.Swaminathan
Bench: G.R.Swaminathan
                                                                                Crl.O.P.No.1256 of 2025

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                  DATED : 17.01.2025

                                                         CORAM

                              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

                                               Crl.O.P.No.1256 of 2025

                     Varadarajan
                     S/o.Meenakshi Sundaram                                    .. Petitioner
                                                          vs.

                     1.The Superintendent of Prison,
                       Central Prison, Coimbatore.

                     2.The State represented by
                       The Inspector of Police,
                       Sulur Police Station,
                       Coimbatore.
                       Crime No.594 of 2014                                    .. Respondents

                     Prayer: Criminal Original Petition under Section 528 of B.N.S.S.
                     equivalent to Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the first respondent to
                     set off the petitioner's remand period from 28.11.2014 to 07.01.2015 as an
                     under-trial prisoner in connection with the case in C.C.No.546 of 2017 on
                     the file of Judicial Magistrate, Sulur, Coimbatore.
                                     For Petitioner  :      Mr.R.Vivekananthan
                                     For Respondents :      Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar
                                                            Government Advocate [Crl.side]
                                                         *****


                     1/4



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                  Crl.O.P.No.1256 of 2025

                                                       ORDER

Heard the learned counsel on either side.

2. The petitioner was convicted for the offence under Section

392 IPC and sentenced to three years rigorous imprisonment vide judgment

dated 27.07.2018 in C.C.No.546 of 2017 on the file of Judicial Magistrate,

Sulur, Coimbatore. Questioning the same, the petitioner filed C.A.No.335 of

2018 before the I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore,

which was dismissed vide judgment dated 17.12.2018. Challenging the

same, the petitioner filed Crl.R.C.No.101 of 2019 before this Court and the

same was dismissed by order dated 02.02.2021. Aggrieved by the same, the

petitioner filed Special Leave Appeal (Crl.) No.6950 of 2023 before the

Honourable Supreme Court of India, which was also dismissed vide

judgment dated 09.10.2023. The only request made by the petitioner in this

petition is that the pre-trial incarceration suffered by him should be set-off.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner draws my attention to

Section 428 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which reads as follows:

"428. Period of detention undergone by the accused to be set off against the sentence of imprisonment.

Where an accused person has, on conviction, been sentenced to imprisonment for a term, not being imprisonment in default of payment of fine, the period of detention, if any, undergone by him during the investigation, inquiry or trial of the same case and before the date of such conviction shall be set off against the term of imprisonment imposed on him on such conviction, and the liability of such person to undergo imprisonment on such conviction shall be restricted to the remainder, if any, of the term of imprisonment imposed on him."

As rightly pointed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, it is mandatory

in nature.

4. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the

petitioner that this provision can be invoked even by filing a miscellaneous

petition before the Court at any time. In support of his contention, the

judgment in Suraj Bhan v. Om Prakash and another [(1976) 1 SCC 886]

is pressed into service. This decision was followed by a learned Judge of

this Court vide order dated 11.09.2020 in Crl.O.P.No.5814 of 2020.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J

rka/gm

5. In the instant case, the petitioner was arrested on 28.11.2014

and he was granted bail on 07.01.2015. This period from 28.11.2014 to

07.01.2015 is directed to be set off in terms of Section 428 Cr.P.C.

Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed.

17.01.2025 Note: Issue order copy by 21.01.2025 Neutral Citation: Yes/No Index: yes/no Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order rka/gm To

1.The Judicial Magistrate, Sulur, Coimbatore.

2.The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison, Coimbatore.

3.The Inspector of Police, Sulur Police Station, Coimbatore. Crime No.594 of 2014

4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter