Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S.Hajee A.P Bava Infra Private ... vs Lnv Technology Pvt. Ltd
2025 Latest Caselaw 1454 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1454 Mad
Judgement Date : 3 January, 2025

Madras High Court

M/S.Hajee A.P Bava Infra Private ... vs Lnv Technology Pvt. Ltd on 3 January, 2025

Author: Abdul Quddhose
Bench: Abdul Quddhose
                                                                         C.S. No.359 of 2020 etc.

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATUE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED: 03.01.2025

                                                     CORAM

                             THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

                                            C.S.Nos.359 and 362 of 2020
                                                       and
                                      C.S.(Comm.Div.) Nos.147 and 149 of 2022


                     M/s.Hajee A.P Bava Infra Private Limited,
                     Bangalore.                    ...Plaintiff in C.S.Nos.359 and 362/2020
                                                   .. Defendant in C.S.Nos.147 & 149/22


                                                     -VS-



                     LNV Technology Pvt. Ltd.        ...Defendant in C.S.Nos.359 & 362/2020
                                                     ... Plaintiff in C.S.Nos.147 & 149/22


                     Prayer in C.S.No.359/2020:- This suit is filed under Order IV Rule 1 of
                     the Madras High Court Original Side Rules, 1956, read with Order VII
                     Rule I CPC seeking;

                     a) to declare that the invocation of the Bank Guarantee IBG106025 with
                     Federal Bank dated 07.03.2020 and extended on 25.06.2020 by the
                     Defendant on 12.08.2020 is illegal and arbitrary and consequently the
                     Defendant is liable to return a sum of Rs.80,00,000/- being the amount of
                     Bank Guarantee to the Plaintiff;

                     b) to direct the Defendant to pay a sum of Rs. 1,48,99,106/- (Rupees One
                     Crore Forty-Eight Lakh Ninety-Nine Thousand, One Hundred and Six

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                     1/6
                                                                          C.S. No.359 of 2020 etc.

                     only) to the Plaintiff towards idle charges for the period between
                     22.03.2020 till 03.05.2020;

                     c) to direct the Defendant to pay a sum of Rs.30,45,580/-. (Rupees Thirty
                     Lakh Forty-Five Thousand Five Hundred and Eighty only) to the
                     Plaintiff towards idle charges for the period between 28.08.2020 till
                     29.09.2020;

                     d) mandatory Injunction directing the Defendant to release the machinery
                     and equipments belonging to the Plaintiff, enumerated in Annexure-I to
                     this Plaint;

                     e) to direct the Defendant to pay a sum of Rs. 1,01,62,622/- (Rupees one
                     crore one sixty two thousand six hundred and twenty two only) towards
                     loss of profit suffered by the Plaintiff owing to the unlawful and
                     unilateral termination of the Contract by the Respondent;

                     f) permanent injunction restraining the Defendant by themselves, their
                     directors, partners, men, servants, agents, associates, officers,
                     representatives, and/or all other persons acting on their behalf from in
                     any manner making use of the machinery and equipments belonging to
                     the Plaintiff, enumerated in Annexure-I to this Plaint and;

                     g) to direct the Defendant to pay simple interest at the rate of 18% on the
                     prayers from (a) to (g) from the date the said sums became due till the
                     date of its actual payment; and

                     h) to award costs in favour of the Plaintiff and against the Defendant.

                     Prayer in C.S.No.362/2020:- This suit is filed under Order IV Rule 1 of
                     the Madras High Court Original Side Rules, 1956, read with Order VII
                     Rule I CPC seeking;

                     a) to declare that the invocation of the Bank Guarantee IBG103833 dated
                     23.12.2019 and extended on 23.06.2020 by the Defendant on 12.08.2020
                     is illegal and arbitrary and consequently the Defendant is liable to return
                     a sum of Rs.63,93,790/- being the amount of Bank Guarantee to the
                     Plaintiff;

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                     2/6
                                                                           C.S. No.359 of 2020 etc.


                     b) to direct the Defendant to pay a sum of Rs.57,31,572/- to the Plaintiff,
                     being the idle costs incurred by the Plaintiff between the period
                     22.03.2020 till 14.04.2020;

                     c) to direct the Defendant to pay a sum of Rs. 54,92,756/- to the Plaintiff,
                     being the idle costs incurred by the Plaintiff between the period
                     15.04.2020 till 07.05.2020;

                     d) to direct the Defendant to pay a sum of Rs. 79,466/- to the Plaintiff,
                     being the idle costs incurred by the Plaintiff between the period
                     29.08.2020 till 30.09.2020;

                     e) mandatory Injunction directing the Defendant to release the machinery
                     and equipments belonging to the Plaintiff, enumerated in Annexure-I to
                     this Plaint;

                     f) to direct the Defendant to pay a sum of Rs. 13,12,423/- towards the
                     R.A Bills raised by the Plaintiff;

                     g) to direct the Defendant to pay a sum of Rs. 30,80,528/- towards loss of
                     profit suffered by the Plaintiff owing to the unlawful and unilateral
                     termination of the Contract by the Respondent;

                     h) permanent injunction restraining the Defendant by themselves, their
                     directors, partners, men, servants, agents, associates, officers,
                     representatives, and/or all other persons acting on their behalf from in
                     any manner making use of the machinery and equipment's belonging to
                     the Plaintiff, enumerated in Annexure-1 to this Plaint;

                     i) to direct the Defendant to pay simple interest at the rate of 18% on the
                     prayers from (a) to (h) from the date the said sums became due till the
                     date of its actual payment; and

                     j) award costs in favour of the Plaintiff and against the Defendant.




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                     3/6
                                                                         C.S. No.359 of 2020 etc.

                     Prayer in C.S.(Comm.Div.)No.147/2022:- This suit is filed under Order
                     IV Rule 1 of the Madras High Court Original Side Rules, 1956, read with
                     Order VII Rule I CPC seeking;

                     a) to direct the defendant to pay a sum of Rs.1,97,84,763/- as being the
                     excess amount paid by the plaintiff to the defendant amounting to
                     Rs.1,18,41,287/- together with interest @18% p.a. for one year along
                     with future interest at the rate of 18% p.a from the date of suit till the
                     payment is made by the defendants collectively and severally.

                     b) To direct the defendant to pay a sum of Rs.31,96,895/- towards
                     Liquidated damages at the rate of 5% of the contract value for the
                     damages caused to the Plaintiff along with interest at the rate of 18% per
                     annum of Rs.31,96,895/- from the date of this suit till the date of
                     realisation; and

                     c) To direct the defendant to pay a sum of Rs 31,96,895/- towards breach
                     of contract at the rate of 5% of the contract value for the damages caused
                     to the Plaintiff along with interest at the rate of 18% per annum of
                     Rs.31,96,895/-from the date of this suit till the date of realisation.

                     Prayer in C.S.(Comm.Div.)No.149/2022:- This suit is filed under Order
                     IV Rule 1 of the Madras High Court Original Side Rules, 1956, read with
                     Order VII Rule I CPC seeking;

                     a) to direct the defendant to pay a sum of Rs. 1,18,03,105/- towards
                     Liquidated damages @ 5% of the contract value along with future
                     interest @ 18% per annum from the date of suit till the date of
                     realisation; and

                     b) to direct the defendant to pay a sum of Rs. 1,18,03,105/- @ 5% on the
                     contract value towards damages caused to the defendant due to breach of
                     contract along with future interest @ 18% per annum from the date of
                     suit till the date of realisation.




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                     4/6
                                                                               C.S. No.359 of 2020 etc.


                                        For Plaintiff
                                        (M/s.Hajee A.P Bava Infra Private Limited)
                                                                : Ms.Ramya Subramaniam
                                        For Defendant
                                        (LNV Technology Pvt. Ltd.) : Mr.U.Karunakaran


                                                   COMMON JUDGMENT

The learned counsels for the respective plaintiffs in the aforesaid

suits submit that the suits have been settled out of Court and they have

also made an endorsement to that effect in the court bundle. Recording

the said endorsement, the suits are dismissed as settled out of Court.

Registry is directed to refund full Court fees to the respective plaintiffs in

the aforesaid suits. No Costs.

03.01.2025

rkm

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.S. No.359 of 2020 etc.

ABDUL QUDDHOSE,J.

rkm

C.S.Nos.359 and 362 of 2020 and

of 2022

03.01.2025

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter