Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rajesh vs The State Of Tamil Nadu
2025 Latest Caselaw 3095 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3095 Mad
Judgement Date : 21 February, 2025

Madras High Court

Rajesh vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 21 February, 2025

Author: B.Pugalendhi
Bench: B.Pugalendhi
                                                                            CRL.MP(MD).No.2191 of 2025


                       BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                    DATED : 21.02.2025

                                                         CORAM:

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

                                               CRL.MP(MD).No.2191 of 2025
                                                           in
                                                CRL A (MD).No.523 of 2024

                     Rajesh                                                     .. Petitioner

                                                            Vs.

                     The State of Tamil Nadu
                     Rep by The Inspector of Police,
                     Boothapandi Police Station,
                     Boothapandi,
                     Kanyakumari District.
                     (Crime No. 228 of 2016)                                    .. Respondent

                                       For Petitioner:        Mr.N.Pragalathan
                                       For Respondent:        Mr.P.Kottaichamy,
                                                              Government Advocate (Crl Side)

                                                          ORDER

The petitioner was found guilty by the Additional District and

Sessions Judge, (FTC), Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil in SC.No.74

of 2017 for the offences under Section 304 (ii) IPC and convicted and

sentenced to undergo 5 years rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of

_________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Rs.1,000/- with default clause vide judgment dated 17.04.2024.

2. The case of the prosecution is that while travelling in a bus

bearing No.TN 74 N0955, there was a quarrel between the petitioner and

a co-passenger and in that incident, he is said to have assaulted him with

hands and pushed him down and in the said quarrel, the deceased fell

down from foot-board of the bus and died. The case was registered for

the offences under Sections 294 (b) and 302 IPC. In conclusion of the

Trial, this petitioner was found guilty for the offence under Section 304

(ii) IPC and convicted as stated above.

3. As against the conviction, this petitioner has filed an appeal

before this Court in Crl.A.No.523/2024 and the same was admitted by

this Court. The petitioner has filed an application to suspend the sentence

in Crl.MP(MD).No.8724/2024, the same was dismissed vide order dated

30.08.2024, considering the date, which was too earlier to enlarge the

petitioner on bail. Even after the dismissal of the earlier petition to

suspend the sentence, the appeal could not be taken up for final hearing.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this petitioner

is in jail since 17.04.2024. According to him, this case has been foisted

_________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

against the petitioner falsely and the deceased was in a drunken mood,

fell on his own out of the bus and sustained injuries.

6.The learned Government Advocate (Crl Side) by referring to the

earlier orders of this Court submits that the earlier application to suspend

the sentence was dismissed and there is no change in circumstances.

7.This Court considered the rival submissions made and perused

the material placed on record.

8.Though the earlier application filed by the petitioner to suspend

the sentence was dismissed by this court, the petitioner has made out a

case that the main criminal appeal could not be taken up for final

disposal. Considering the fact that the petitioner is in jail for nearly one

(1) year and the petitioner is having some arguable points in the main

appeal and it could not be taken up for final disposal immediately, this

Court is inclined to suspend the sentence pending the criminal appeal.

9. Accordingly, this petition is allowed and the substantive

sentence of imprisonment alone is suspended pending disposal of the

criminal appeal and the petitioner is ordered to be enlarged on bail on

executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only)

_________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned

Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari District at

Nagercoil and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before

the said Court on the first working day of every English Calendar Month

at 10.30am.

21.02.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes

nst

_________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

To

1.The Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari District, at Nagercoil.

2. The Inspector of Police, Boothapandi Police Station, Boothapandi, Kanyakumari District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court.

Madurai.

_________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

nst

in

Dated: 21.02.2025

_________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter