Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Nagarjun vs The Inspector Of Police
2025 Latest Caselaw 6631 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 6631 Mad
Judgement Date : 30 April, 2025

Madras High Court

Nagarjun vs The Inspector Of Police on 30 April, 2025

                                                                                       Crl.O.P.(MD)No.8034 of 2025


                           BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                  DATED: 30.04.2025

                                                          CORAM

                                  THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL

                                            Crl.O.P.(MD)No.8034 of 2025
                                                        and
                                       Crl.M.P(MD) Nos.6069 and 6072 of 2025
                     1. Nagarjun
                     2. Palaniyappan
                     3. Selvarani
                     4. Sekar
                     5. Kattammal
                     6. Rengasamy
                     7. Saranya                                                                 .. Petitioners

                                                               Vs.

                     1. The Inspector of Police
                        All Women Police Station
                        Palani, Dindigul District

                     2. Muthammal
                        Extension Officer
                        Social Welfare Department
                        Palani Panchayat Union
                        Dindigul District

                     3. Divya Bharathi                                                      .. Respondents

                     PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS,
                     to call for the records pertaining to the charge sheet in Special S.C.No.22
                     of 2025 on the file of the Fast Track Mahila Court, Dindigul and quash the
                     same in so far as the petitioner is concerned.


                     1/6



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis              ( Uploaded on: 12/05/2025 12:24:31 pm )
                                                                                            Crl.O.P.(MD)No.8034 of 2025




                                        For Petitioner           : Mr.T.Lenin Kumar

                                        For Respondents          : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar
                                        No.1                       Government Advocate(Crl.Side)
                                        No.3                     : Mr.D.Venkatesh

                                                                ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the charge

sheet in Special S.C.No.22 of 2025 on the file of the Fast Track Mahila

Court, Dindigul

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned

counsels appearing on either side and victim also present. Both the victim

and the accused filed joint compromise memo stating that the first

petitioner and the third respondent/ victim got married and now the victim

is nine month pregnant. The victim and the first petitioner are now living

together as husband and wife and the victim has no objection to quash the

charge sheet.

3.Today both the parties present and this Court also enquired the

victim as well as the first petitioner and both stated that they are living as

husband and wife and she is now nine month pregnant. Therefore it is

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 12/05/2025 12:24:31 pm )

appropriate to allow the petition based on the compromise arrived at

between the parties.

4. At this juncture, it is relevant to refer the judgement of the

Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of K.Dhandapani Vs. The State by

the Inspector of Police reported in 2022 SCC Online SC 1056, has held as

follows:

“In the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, we are of the considered view that the conviction and sentence of the appellant who is maternal uncle of the prosecutrix deserves to be set aside in view of the subsequent events that have been brought to the notice of this Court. This Court cannot shut its eyes to the ground reality and disturb the happy family life of the appellant and the prosecutrix. We have been informed about the custom in Tamilnadu of the marriage of a girl with the maternal uncle”.

5.The legal position expressed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the

case of Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab and another reported in (2012) 10

SCC 303 and Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Vs. State of Gujarat)

reported in (2017) 9 SCC 641 were taken into consideration.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 12/05/2025 12:24:31 pm )

6. In view of the above said judgments and the fact that the first

petitioner and the victim/third respondent are living together as husband

and wife after marriage and now she is nine month pregnant and though

charges are grave in nature, considering the relationship between the

parties and the amicable settlement between themselves this Court is of the

view that the compromise is to be accepted. Therefore inorder to meet the

ends of justice by invoking inherent power of this Court, this Criminal

Original Petition stands allowed and the pending proceedings against the

petitioners in Special S.C.No.22 of 2025 on the file of the Fast Track

Mahila Court, Dindigul is hereby quashed. Consequently connected

miscellaneous petitions stand closed.




                                                                                                  30.04.2025

                     NCC      : Yes/No
                     Index    : Yes / No
                     Internet : Yes / No
                     aav








https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                   ( Uploaded on: 12/05/2025 12:24:31 pm )



                     To

                     1. The Fast Track Mahila Court, Dindigul

                     2. The Inspector of Police
                        All Women Police Station
                        Palani, Dindigul District

                     3.The Additional Public Prosecutor,
                       Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,
                       Madurai.








https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis            ( Uploaded on: 12/05/2025 12:24:31 pm )




                                                                               P.DHANABAL,J.

                                                                                                  aav









                                                                                         30.04.2025







https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 12/05/2025 12:24:31 pm )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter