Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vikram vs The Deputy Superintendent Of Police
2025 Latest Caselaw 6627 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 6627 Mad
Judgement Date : 30 April, 2025

Madras High Court

Vikram vs The Deputy Superintendent Of Police on 30 April, 2025

Author: B.Pugalendhi
Bench: B.Pugalendhi
                                                                                    Crl.A(MD)No.508 of 2025

                      BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                         DATED :30.04.2025

                                                     CORAM:

                             THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI


                                        Crl.A(MD)No.508 of 2025


                   Vikram                                                            ... Appellant

                                                           Vs

                   1.The Deputy Superintendent of Police,
                     Alangulam,
                     Tenkasi District.

                   2.State of Tamil Nadu
                     Represented by
                     The Inspector of Police,
                     Alwarkurichi Police Station,
                     Tenkasi District.
                     Crime No.40/2022.

                   3.Balamurugan                                                    ... Respondents

                   PRAYER: Appeal filed under Section 14-A(2) of Schedule Caste and
                   Schedule Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 2015, to
                   set aside the order passed in Cr.MP.No.1015 of 2025, dated
                   17.04.2025, on the file of the Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi and
                   1/7




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis           ( Uploaded on: 30/04/2025 07:10:16 pm )
                                                                                         Crl.A(MD)No.508 of 2025

                   allow the Criminal Appeal and enlarge the appellant on bail in Crime
                   No.103 of 2025, on the file of the second respondent police.


                                  For Appellant       : Mr.N.Vignesh
                                  For R1 & R2         : Mr.P.Kottaichamy
                                                        Government Advocate
                                  R3                  : No appearance


                                                   JUDGMENT

The appellant/A3 was arrested on 29.03.2025 in connection

with the case in Cr.No.103 of 2025 that he along with two other

accused assaulted the defacto complainant. The said case was

registered for the offence under Sections 296(b), 131, 118(1), 351(3)

of BNS, 2023 and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(va) of SC/ST(POA)

Act. The appellant has filed a petition in Cr.M.P.No.1015 of 2025,

seeking bail, before the Principal Sessions Court, Tenkasi, and the

same was dismissed by the trial Court, by its order dated 17.04.2025.

As against the same, the appellant has preferred this appeal.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 30/04/2025 07:10:16 pm )

that in fact, the appellant is the victim and the defacto complainant/3 rd

respondent herein is the aggressor. There is a case (Crime No.103 of

2025) and counter case (Crime No.104 of 2025). On the complaint of

the first accused in Crime No.103 of 2025, a case was registered as

against the defacto complainant in Cr.No.104 of 2025 on the file of the

Inspector of Police, Alwarkuruchi Police Station. The respondent

Police, instead of finding out, who is the aggressor, has mechanically

registered the case based on the complaint of the defacto complainant

and arrested the appellant. The learned counsel further submits that

the defacto complainant/3rd respondent herein was arrested in Cr.No.

104 of 2025 and he is now in Central Prison, Palayamkottai.

3.In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for

the appellant that the defacto complainant is in Prison, this Court by its

order, dated 28.04.2025, directed the Registry to serve notice and

inform about the listing of this appeal before this Court on 30.04.2025

to the defacto complainant, who is in Prison at Palayamkottai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 30/04/2025 07:10:16 pm )

4.Today, when this Criminal Appeal is taken up for hearing,

the respondent police has filed a report with an endorsement of the

Superintendent, Sub Jail, Ambasamuthiram with an information that

the filing of Criminal Appeal in Crl.A(MD) No.508 of 2024 by the

appellant before this Court and listing of the same before this Court

today was duly informed to the defacto complainant. The defacto

complainant has mentioned that he is not having any objection to grant

bail to this appellant.

5.In view of the above, this Court is inclined to allow this

Criminal Appeal. Accordingly, this Criminal Appeal is allowed and

the order passed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi in

Cr.MP.No.1015 of 2025, dated 17.04.2025 is hereby set aside. The

appellant is ordered to be released on bail on the following

conditions:-

i) The appellant shall execute a bond for a sum

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 30/04/2025 07:10:16 pm )

of Rs.25,000/-(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi

ii) The appellant and the sureties shall submit a copy of their Aadhaar Card or any other identity card issued by the Government in proof of their residence address;

iii)The appellant shall stay at Kovilpatti and report before the Inspector of Police, Kovilpatti West Police Station daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

iv)The appellant shall file an affidavit of undertaking before the respondent police as well as before the trial Court that he will not involve in any offence in future.

v) The appellant shall not misuse the liberty granted to him by indulging in any further offence and shall not tamper with the prosecution witnesses. The appellant shall co-operate for the investigation.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 30/04/2025 07:10:16 pm )

vi) On violation of any of the above conditions by the appellant, the respondent police shall move an application for cancellation of the bail.

30.04.2025

NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. vrn

To

1.The Principal Sessions Judge, Tenkasi

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Alangulam, Tenkasi District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Alwarkurichi Police Station, Tenkasi District.

4.The Inspector of Polcie, Kovilpatti West Police Station, Kovilpatti.

5.The Superintendent, Central Prison, Palayamkottai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 30/04/2025 07:10:16 pm )

B.PUGALENDHI, J.,

vrn

Judgment made in

30.04.2025

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 30/04/2025 07:10:16 pm )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter