Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Munusamy vs State Of Tamil Nadu
2025 Latest Caselaw 6347 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 6347 Mad
Judgement Date : 23 April, 2025

Madras High Court

Munusamy vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 23 April, 2025

Author: M.S.Ramesh
Bench: M.S. Ramesh
                                                                                       HCP No. 518 of 2025




                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED: 23-04-2025

                                                         CORAM

                               THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH
                                               AND
                             THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR

                                                HCP No. 518 of 2025



                MUNUSAMY
                S/o. Shanmugam, No22,
                Vinayagapuram 9th Street, Tondiarpet,
                Chennai 600 081

                                                                                       Petitioner(s)

                                                              Vs

                1. State Of Tamil Nadu, Rep By
                The Principal Secretary To Government
                Home Prohibition And Excise
                Departments, Fort St George, Chennai
                600 009

                2.The Commissioner Of Police
                Avadi City Police Commissioner,
                Office Of The Commissioner Of Police,
                Avadi, Chennai 600 054

                3.The Superintendent Of Police
                Central Prison, Puzhal , Chennai 66




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis              ( Uploaded on: 25/04/2025 11:33:59 am )
                                                                                          HCP No. 518 of 2025



                4.The Inspector Of Police
                M6 Manali Police Station, Chennai

                                                                                          Respondent(s)


                PRAYER
                To issue a writ of Habeas Corpus or any other writ of direction calling for the
                records relating to the detention order in Memo no 143/ BCDFGISSSV/ 2024
                dated 28.08.2024 passed by the 2nd respondent under the Tamilnadu Act 14 of
                1982 and set aside the same and direct the respondent to produce the petitioners
                son Subash alias Lala S/o. Munusamy the detenue . Now confned in Central
                Prison, Puzha, Chennai before this honble court and set the petitioners son
                Subash alias Lala S/O. Munusamy, aged about 23 years the detene herein set
                him at liberty

                                  For Petitioner :        Mr. N. Naresh

                                  For Respondent :        Mr.R.Muniyapparaj
                                                          Additional Public Prosecutor
                                                          Assisted by Mr.M.Sylvester John

                                                            ORDER

M.S.RAMESH, J.

AND N.SENTHILKUMAR, J.

The petitioner herein/ who is the father of the detenu viz. Subash @ Lala,

S/o.Munusamy, aged about 23 years, has come forward with this petition

challenging the detention order passed by the second respondent dated

28.08.2024 slapped on his son, branding him as "Goonda" under the Tamil

Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Cyber Law Offenders,

Drug Offenders, Forest Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders, Sand

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 25/04/2025 11:33:59 am )

Offenders, Sexual Offenders, Slum Grabbers and Video Pirates Act, 1982

[Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982].

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as the learned

Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents.

3. Though several grounds are raised in the petition, the learned counsel

for the petitioner submitted that there is an inordinate delay in passing the order

of detention.

4. In the instant case, the detenu was arrested on 30.06.2024 and

thereafter, the detention order came to be passed on 28.08.2024. This fact is

not disputed by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor.

5. In the case of 'Sushanta Kumar Banik Vs. State of Tripura', reported

in '2022 LiveLaw (SC) 813', when there was an inordinate delay from the date

of proposal till passing of the detention order and likewise, between the date of

detention order and the actual arrest, the Hon'ble Supreme Court had held that

the live and proximate link, between the grounds and the purpose of detention,

stands snapped in arresting the detenu. The relevant observation of the Hon'ble

Supreme Court is extracted hereunder:-

“20. It is manifestly clear from a conspectus of the above decisions of this Court, that the underlying principle is that if there

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 25/04/2025 11:33:59 am )

is unreasonable delay between the date of the order of detention & actual arrest of the detenu and in the same manner from the date of the proposal and passing of the order of detention, such delay unless satisfactorily explained throws a considerable doubt on the genuineness of the requisite subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority in passing the detention order and consequently render the detention order bad and invalid because the “live and proximate link” between the grounds of detention and the purpose of detention is snapped in arresting the detenu. A question whether the delay is unreasonable and stands unexplained depends on the facts and circumstances of each case.”

6. Drawing inspiration from the judgment in Sushanta Kumar Banik's

case, a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of 'Gomathi Vs. Principal

Secretary to Government and Others', reported in '2023 SCC OnLine Mad

6332', had held that when there is an inordinate delay from the date of

arrest/date of proposal till the order of detention, the live and proximate link

between them would also stand snapped and thereby, had quashed the detention

order on this ground.

7. In yet another case i.e., in 'Nagaraj Vs. State of Tamil Nadu', reported

in '(2018) 3 MWN (Cri) 428', this Court had held that the delay of 36 days in

passing the detention order after the arrest of the detenu would snap the live and

proximate link between the grounds and purpose of detention. Hence, in view

of the unexplained and inordinate delay in passing the order of detention, after

the arrest of the detenu, the detention order in the present case, is liable to be

quashed.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 25/04/2025 11:33:59 am )

8. Accordingly, the detention order passed by the second respondent on

28.08.2024 in No.143/BCDFGISSSV/2024 is hereby set aside and the Habeas

Corpus Petition is allowed. The detenu viz., Subash @ Lala, S/o.Munusamy,

aged 23 years, now confined at Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai, is directed to

be set at liberty forthwith, unless his confinement is required in connection with

any other case.

(M.S.RAMESH J.) (N.SENTHILKUMAR J.) 23-04-2025

ASI

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 25/04/2025 11:33:59 am )

To

1.State Of Tamil Nadu, Rep By The Principal Secretary To Governmetn Home Prohibition And Excise Departments, Fort St George, Chennai 600 009

2.The Commissioner Of Police Avadi City Police Commissioner, Office Of The Commissioner Of Police, Avadi, Chennai 600 054.

3.The Superintendent Of Police Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai - 66

4.The Inspector Of Police M6 Manali Police Station, Chennai.

5. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 25/04/2025 11:33:59 am )

M.S.RAMESH J.

AND N.SENTHILKUMAR J.

ASI

23-04-2025

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 25/04/2025 11:33:59 am )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter