Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

D.Gajalakshmi vs The District Collector
2025 Latest Caselaw 6288 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 6288 Mad
Judgement Date : 22 April, 2025

Madras High Court

D.Gajalakshmi vs The District Collector on 22 April, 2025

Author: M.Sundar
Bench: M.Sundar
                                                                                            W.P.No.14185 of 2025

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                    DATED : 22.04.2025

                                                             CORAM

                                     THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR
                                                    and
                       THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI

                                               W.P.No.14185 of 2025
                                                        &
                                         W.M.P Nos.15938 and 15940 of 2025

                     D.Gajalakshmi
                     W/o.S.Dheenadhayalan                                                ... Petitioner

                                                                  vs.

                     1. The District Collector
                        Kallakurichi District
                        Kallakurichi

                     2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kallakurichi
                        /The Chairperson/Convener
                        Divisional Monitoring Committee (Encroachment)
                        Kallakurichi
                        Kallakurichi District

                     3. The Tahsildar
                        Kallakurichi Taluk
                        Kallkurichi District

                     4. The Assistant Engineer
                        Water Resources Department (Irrigation Division)
                         P.W.D Kallkurichi


                     Page Nos.1/11




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                ( Uploaded on: 25/04/2025 11:33:55 am )
                                                                                                      W.P.No.14185 of 2025

                          Kallakurichi District

                     5. The Assistant Electrical Engineer (Town)
                        TANGEDCO
                        Kallkurichi
                        Kallkurichi District                                                 ... Respondents

                           Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
                     praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records related to the
                     “Eviction Order No.Nil dated 09.04.2025 passed by the fourth respondent
                     and quash the same.

                                        For Petitioner          :       Mr.S.R.Rajagopal
                                                                        for Mr.R.M.Makesh Kumarvel

                                        For Respondents :               Mr.T.K.Saravanan
                                                                        Additional Government Pleader
                                                                        for R1 to R4

                                                                        Mr.Swami Subramanian
                                                                        Standing counsel for R5

                                                                ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR, J.,]

Captioned main 'Writ Petition' ['WP' for the sake of brevity] has been

filed with a prayer for issuance of a writ of certiorari qua an order dated

09.04.2025 made by R4.

2. Short facts are that one Ms.K.Manimegalai filed W.P 14239 of 2024

on 21.05.2024 assailing an eviction order dated 17.05.2024 made by R5 in

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 25/04/2025 11:33:55 am )

the captioned matter; that pending writ petition, Ms. K.Manimegalai died;

that the date of demise is 03.11.2024; that W.P.No.14239 of 2024 was taken

up for final disposal on 18.03.2025 but the counsel on record

Mr.R.M.Makesh Kumarvel did not bring to the notice of this Court the

factum of demise of Ms.K.Manimegalai; that it is now contended that this is

owing to lapse in communication; that writ petition (W.P.No.14239 of 2024

along with WMP thereat) came to be disposed of by this Court on

18.03.2025 inter alia holding that T.K.Shanmugam principle has to be

followed by construing the impugned notice thereat as a 'show-cause notice'

['SCN']; that writ petitioner in the captioned matter (D.Gajalakshmi,

daughter of Manimegalai) sent objections (dated 28.03.2025) to SCN; that

considering the objections, R5 made the impugned order.

3. Today, Mr. S.R.Rajagopal, learned Senior counsel appearing on

behalf of Mr.R.M.Makesh Kumarvel, counsel on record for writ petitioner

who is before us, submits that factum of demise of Ms.K.Manimegalai on

03.11.2024 was not brought to the notice of this Court by his instructing

counsel solely owing to lapse in communication between client's family

(writ petitioner in captined matter) and the lawyer. We refrain from delving

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 25/04/2025 11:33:55 am )

into this question further and we deem it appropriate to plough into the main

matter as it can otherwise result in a case of 'missing the woods for the trees'

4. One of the main contentions in writ petitioner's campaign against

the impugned order is that the SCN was issued to a dead person.

5. Issue notice to respondents.

6. Mr.T.K.Saravanan, learned Additional Government Pleader accepts

notice for all five respondents and learned State counsel submits that when

the SCN was issued, Ms.K.Manimegalai was alive and the writ petitioner

has chosen to respond.

7. Considering the limited landscape of the captioned main WP, with

the consent of learned counsel on both sides, main WP was taken up and

heard out in the Admission Board.

8. We find that the point that SCN was issued to a dead person has

been urged in the aforesaid response dated 28.03.2025. Learned Senior

counsel, on instructions, submits that this point would continue to be pressed

into service though counsel on record has failed to bring to the notice of this

Court demise of Manimegalai. Therefore, we deem it appropriate to give a

quietus to the matter by interfering with the impugned order i.e., setting

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 25/04/2025 11:33:55 am )

aside the same on the short dead person point and preserving the rights of

the State to issue notice to legal heirs of Manimegalai and follow

T.K.Shanmugam principle.

9. Before we proceed further, we make it clear that by referring to

T.K.Shanmugam principle, we refer to the principle laid down by Hon'ble

Full Bench in T.K.Shanmugam Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu and others

reported in 2015 SCC OnLine Mad 9343. Relevant paragraphs are sub-sub-

paragraphs (i), (ii) and (iii) of sub-paragraph (f) of paragraph No.15 which in

turn reiterates paragraph 42 of T.S.Senthil Kumar {T.S.Sentil Kumar Vs.

Government of Tamil Nadu and others reported in 2010 SCC OnLine Mad

1347}. For convenience, we deem it appropriate to set out this sub-sub-

paragraphs (i), (ii) and (iii) of sub-paragraph (f) of paragraph No.15, we do

so and the same read as follows:

'15. Certain provisions of Tank Act namely, Sections 4 to 10 were challenged in a Writ Petition with a prayer to declare those provisions as null and void and contrary to Article 14 of the Constitution of India on the ground that those provisions confer upon the executive, unguided and uncanalised discretionary power, since they denied to the persons aggrieved an opportunity of being heard. The said Writ petition was heard by a Division Bench to which one of us (M.Sathyanarayanan,J.) was a party. The Division Bench took note of the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 25/04/2025 11:33:55 am )

various decisions including the decision in the case of Sivakasi Region Tax Payers Association (supra), disposed of the Writ Petitions without declaring the provisions of the Act as unconstitutional, since no opportunity is given and held that there is nothing in the Act which excludes the principles of natural justice, the Act (Tank Act) does not specifically indicate that the encroachers do not have right to be heard and issued the following directions vide judgment dated 10.02.2010, reported in 2010 3 MLJ 771.

                                  (a)    .....

                                  (b)    .....

                                  (c)    .....

                                  (d)    ......

                                  (e)    .....

                                   (f)     We uphold the Act, while we provide for observance of

principles of natural justice within the Act itself, as under.

(i) When the officer of the Public Works Department publishes the notice in Form-II in the notice boards of the offices of Village Administrative Officer, Village Panchayat Office and the Water Resources Organization, notice shall also be issued to the alleged encroacher to the effect that the survey indicates that the place in his/her occupation is an encroachment and secondly, the notice in Form-III of the Rules may be issued.

(ii) On receipt of the said notice, the encroacher may give his/her objections relating to the classification of the land in his/her occupation and the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 25/04/2025 11:33:55 am )

nature of the encroachment within a period of two weeks.

(iii) Thereafter, the authorities shall consider the objections and pass appropriate orders, in accordance with the provisions of the Act, giving time to the encroachers to remove the encroachment.'

10. In the light the narrative, discussion and dispositive reasoning set

out supra, the following order is made:

i) The impugned order being order dated 09.04.2025

made by R4 is set aside on the short and sole point that

Ms.K.Manimegalai is no more but the impugned order has been

made on the basis of Ms.K.Manimegalai being show-caused;

ii) Though obvious we make it clear that all other

questions are left open with regard to both sides;

iii) R4 is now at liberty to issue notice under 'The Tamil

Nadu Protection of Tanks and Eviction of Encroachment Act,

2007' (hereinafter 'Tanks Act' for the sake of convenience and

clarity) afresh to the legal heirs of Ms.K.Manimegalai as per the

Legal Heir Certificate dated 19.12.2024 being Certificate No.

TN-7202412051242, which has been enclosed qua typed-set of

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 25/04/2025 11:33:55 am )

the writ petition;

iv) The legal heirs of Ms.K.Manimegalai can send their

response as per T.K.Shanmugam principle and as all questions

are left open, it is open to the legal heirs to raise the objections

which have been raised by writ petitioner in 28.03.2025

objections also;

v) As per sub-sub-paragraph (iii) of paragraph (f) of

paragraph 15, orders shall be made after considering the

objections;

vi) Though obvious we make it clear that aforementioned

drill shall be done denovo untrammeled by intervening

proceedings;

vii) Any further coercive action shall be subject to and

depending on the orders to be made in aforesaid manner by R4

by following T.K.Shanmugam principle.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 25/04/2025 11:33:55 am )

Captioned WP disposed of in the aforesaid manner. As we have made

it clear that further coercive action (if any and if that be so) is subject to

orders to be made denovo, captioned WMPs have become otiose and the

same are disposed as closed. We refrain from imposing costs.

(M.S.,J.) (K.G.T.,J.) 22.04.2025

Index : Yes/No Speaking order/Non speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No gpa

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 25/04/2025 11:33:55 am )

To

1. The District Collector Kallakurichi District Kallakurichi

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kallakurichi /The Chairperson/Convener Divisional Monitoring Committee (Encroachment) Kallakurichi Kallakurichi District

3. The Tahsildar Kallakurichi Taluk Kallkurichi District

4. The Assistant Engineer Water Resources Department (Irrigation Division) P.W.D Kallkurichi Kallakurichi District

5. The Assistant Electrical Engineer (Town) TANGEDCO Kallkurichi Kallkurichi District

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 25/04/2025 11:33:55 am )

M.SUNDAR, J., and K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J.,

gpa

22.04.2025

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 25/04/2025 11:33:55 am )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter