Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 6267 Mad
Judgement Date : 22 April, 2025
WA(MD). No.1081 of 2025
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Date : 22/04/2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mrs. JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU
AND
THE HONOURABLE Mrs. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY
WA(MD). No.1081 of 2025
and CMP(MD) No.6805 of 2025
The Commissioner
Karaikudi Municipality
Karaikudi
Sivagangai District ... Appellant
v.
S.Kalimuthu ... Respondent
PRAYER :- Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters patent against
the order of this Court dated 24.07.2024 in WP(MD). No.9032/2024.
For Appellants : Mr.EP.Venkateshwar
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.SRIMATHY,J.)
The respondent in the writ petition is the appellant herein.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 07/05/2025 11:50:53 am )
2. Challenging the order of the writ Court dated 24.07.2024 in
WP(MD) No.9032 of 2024, this appeal has been filed.
3. The writ petition was filed to correct the date of birth of the first
respondent's son. Since his son's date of birth differed in the passport
and other documents with that of the birth certificate, he filed the writ
petition to alter the same. The writ Court, finding that there is a ground
made out to correct the date of birth, directed the appellant herein to
change the same and issue the same by making necessary corrections.
Aggrieved by the same, the appellant authority is before this Court.
4. The appellant assailed the order of the writ Court on the ground
that when the birth of the first respondent's son was registered in the
hospital records as 21.08.1986, the same has been entered into in the
birth certificate and hence, the same cannot be altered. It is their
contention that the correction to be done only by the Executive
Magistrate and not by the appellant. When that be the case, the writ
Court directed the appellant to make necessary corrections. It is also their
case that if any corrections are carried out, it should be carried out within
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 07/05/2025 11:50:53 am )
a period of one year. However, in the case on hand, the petitioner has
approached the Court after decades. Hence, on these grounds, the
appellant seeks interference of the order of the writ Court.
5. We have considered the submissions and perused the materials
available on record.
6. It is seen from the records that the date of birth of the first
respondent's son was entered by the hospital authorities as 21.08.1986.
However, it is the case of the respondent before the writ Court that in the
passport and all other records, the date of birth of his son was mentioned
as 13.05.1986. However, in the birth certificate alone, it is mentioned as
21.08.1986 and hence, his son is facing some difficulties.
7. From the above, it is clear that parallel entry cannot be made.
However, it is the case of the respondent that the date of birth in the birth
certificate has been inadvertently mentioned. Hence, the writ Court had
rightly directed the appellant to make necessary and therefore, the
grounds raised cannot be entertained in the present writ appeal.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 07/05/2025 11:50:53 am )
Accordingly, the writ appeal is dismissed. No costs. Consequently
connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
[J.N.B.,J] [S.S.Y.,J]
25.04.2025
NCC : Yes/No
Index : Yes/No
RR
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 07/05/2025 11:50:53 am )
J.NISHA BANU, J
AND
S.SRIMATHY, J.
RR
ORDER
IN
Date : 25/04/2025
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 07/05/2025 11:50:53 am )
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!