Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Project Director vs Y.Firthous Parveen ... 1St
2025 Latest Caselaw 5902 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5902 Mad
Judgement Date : 9 April, 2025

Madras High Court

The Project Director vs Y.Firthous Parveen ... 1St on 9 April, 2025

Author: G.R.Swaminathan
Bench: G.R.Swaminathan
                                                                     C.M.A(MD)No.1084 of 2021 etc batch

                         BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                               DATED: 09.04.2025

                                                         CORAM

                            THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
                                               and
                             THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN

                          C.M.A(MD)Nos.1084 & 1085 of 2021, 341 of 2025, 97 of 2021,
                             273 to 278 of 2025, 942 of 2023, 328 of 2024, 432 of 2024,
                            453 to 455 of 2024, 457 of 2024, 1038 of 2023, 1039 of 2023,
                       1070 of 2023, 1072 of 2023, 1084 of 2023, 1102 of 2023, 1117 of 2023
                                                        and
                               Arb Appeal(MD)Nos.2 to 9 of 2025, 11 to 34 of 2025,
                                             42 & 43 of 2025, 5 of 2024
                                                        and
                       C.M.P(MD)Nos.4345 & 4342 of 2022 & 10257, 10259, 868 of 2021 &
                      1094, 1097, 1100, 1104, 1106, 1196, 1499, 1329, 1759, 1761, 1764, 1767,
                      2056, 2148, 2150, 2151, 2153, 2155, 2157, 5998, 5441, 5702, 1755, 2159,
                      2377, 2379, 2380, 2403, 2404, 2405, 4841, 4842, 4844, 2409, 2411, 2413,
                                       2450, 2451, 4838, 4839, 4840 of 2025,
                                6137, 18487, 4497, 5662, 6092, 6094, 6097 of 2024,
                         15225, 13206, 14671, 14152, 14151, 14718, 14894, 15022 of 2023


                C.M.A(MD)No.1084 of 2021:


                The Project Director,
                National Highways Authority of India,
                NH 49 & 210 National Highways,
                Subramaniapuram 3rd Street,
                I & II Floor,
                Karaikudi.                                                             ... Appellant /
                                                                                           2nd Respondent



                1/6



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis              ( Uploaded on: 30/04/2025 04:35:14 pm )
                                                                          C.M.A(MD)No.1084 of 2021 etc batch

                                                                 Vs.


                1.Y.Firthous Parveen                                                           ... 1st Respondent /
                                                                                                   Appellant

                2.Spl.District Revenue Officer (LAO),
                  NH 49 & 210 National Highways,
                  Collector's Office,
                  Ramnad.                                                                    ... 2nd Respondent /
                                                                                       LAO Competent Authority

                Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 37(1) & (2) of
                Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to set aside the order made in
                Arbitration O.P.No.91 of 2019 on the file of the Principal District Court,
                Madurai dated 09.07.2021 and allow the appeal.


                                           For Appellant             : Mr.Sachin Ragul
                                                                       for Mr.C.Arul Vadivel Alias Sekar

                                           For Respondents           : Mr.M.P.Senthil for R.1

                                                                       Mr.K.Balasubramani
                                                                       Special Government Pleader for R.2


                                                  COMMON JUDGMENT


Heard both sides.

2.The lands belonging to the respondents herein were acquired under

the provisions of the National Highways Act, 1956. The competent authority

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 30/04/2025 04:35:14 pm ) C.M.A(MD)No.1084 of 2021 etc batch

determined the amount payable as compensation. Since the said amount so

determined by the competent authority was not acceptable by the land owners,

they filed an application under Section 3G(5) of the Act before the District

Collector. The District Collector passed arbitral award quantifying the

compensation payable to the land owners. Not satisfied with the same, the

persons whose lands were acquired, filed petitions under Section 34 of the

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. By the orders impugned in these

appeals, the learned District Judges chose to enhance the compensation amount.

Questioning the same, these arbitration appeals have been filed under Section

37 of the Act by the NHAI.

3.The only question that calls for determination is whether the

District Judges could have enhanced the compensation amount and by thus

modifying the arbitral awards while exercising their jurisdiction under Section

34 of the Act. We are conscious that the issue is presently pending reference

before the Hon'ble Constitution Bench of Supreme Court of India in Gayathri

Balasamy Vs M/s.ISG Novasoft Technologies Limited case. Orders have been

reserved. But the position that prevailed on the date when the impugned orders

under Section 34 was passed was that modification cannot be made.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 30/04/2025 04:35:14 pm ) C.M.A(MD)No.1084 of 2021 etc batch

4.We, therefore, hold that the impugned orders are clearly bad in law.

We are therefore inclined to set aside the same and we accordingly set aside the

same.

5.The learned Deputy Solicitor General of India, on instructions from

NHAI, submitted that this Court may adopt the very same approach adopted in

C.M.A.No.2763 of 2023 dated 15.12.2023 by the Hon'ble Division Bench of

this Court. He has no objection for setting aside the arbitral awards impugned

in the petitions filed under Section 34 of the Act. Accordingly, the awards

passed by the District Collector are also set aside. The matter is remitted to the

file of the arbitrator (jurisdictional District Collectors). The arbitrator shall

conclude the proceedings within four months from the date of receipt of a copy

of this order. The erstwhile land owners are entitled to plead that the arbitrator

shall apply the principle of parity. NHAI is also entitled to place materials in

support of their contention that the compensation amount does not deserve to

be enhanced as claimed by the erstwhile land owners. In the event of the

Hon'ble Supreme Court while answering the reference in Gayathri Balasamy

holding that the District Courts are entitled to modify the awards in exercise of

jurisdiction under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the

respondents herein are given liberty to reopen these proceedings. Even if one

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 30/04/2025 04:35:14 pm ) C.M.A(MD)No.1084 of 2021 etc batch

application is filed, we make it clear that Civil Miscellaneous Appeals and

Arbitration Appeals will stand reopened and the matter will be heard on merits.

5.These Civil Miscellaneous Appeals and Arbitration Appeals are

accordingly allowed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently,

connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

                                                                             [G.R.S., J.]    [M.J.R., J.]
                                                                                      09.04.2025
                NCC      : Yes / No
                Internet : Yes / No
                Index    : Yes / No
                MGA

                To

                1.The Principal District Court,
                  Madurai.

                2.Spl.District Revenue Officer (LAO),
                  NH 49 & 210 National Highways,
                  Collector's Office,
                  Ramnad.

3.The Special District Revenue Officer / Competent Authority for Land Acquisition, National Highway – 45E&220, Collectorate Buildings, Theni.

4.The Principal District Judge and Sessions Judge, Theni.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 30/04/2025 04:35:14 pm ) C.M.A(MD)No.1084 of 2021 etc batch

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J and M.JOTHIRAMAN, J.

MGA

5.The Special District Revenue Officer, Competent Authority for Land Acquisition, (National Highways – 45E & 220) having his office at P.C.Patti, Theni.

C.M.A(MD)Nos.1084 & 1085 of 2021, 341 of 2025, 97 of 2021, 273 to 278 of 2025, 942 of 2023, 328 of 2024, 432 of 2024, 453 to 455 of 2024, 457 of 2024, 1038 of 2023, 1039 of 2023, 1070 of 2023, 1072 of 2023, 1084 of 2023, 1102 of 2023, 1117 of 2023 and Arb Appeal(MD)Nos.2 to 9 of 2025, 11 to 34 of 2025, 42 & 43 of 2025, 5 of 2024

09.04.2025

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 30/04/2025 04:35:14 pm )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter