Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 121 Mad
Judgement Date : 1 April, 2025
Crl.A(MD)No.334 of 2025
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED :01.04.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
Crl.A(MD)No.334 of 2025
C.Selvakumar ... Appellant
Vs
1.State of Tamil Nadu
Represented by
The Assistant Commissioner of police,
Anna Nagar Sub Division,
Madurai District.
2.The Sub Inspector of Police,
E3, Anna Nagar Police Station,
Madurai – 20.
3.Devi
4.Rajendran ... Respondents
PRAYER: Appeal filed under Section 14(A)(2) of SC/ST (POA) Act,
to cancel the bail granted to the respondents 3 & 4/accused 1 & 2 in
Crime No.111 of 2025, by the III Additional District and Sessions
Court (PCR), Madurai in Crl.M.P.No.31 of 2025, dated 04.03.2025.
1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 07/04/2025 05:47:01 pm )
Crl.A(MD)No.334 of 2025
For Appellant : Mr.K.Jaganathan
For R1 & R2 : Mr.P.Kottaichamy
Government Advocate
JUDGMENT
This Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 14 (A)(2) of
SC/ST (POA) Act, as against the order passed by the III Additional
District and Sessions Court PCR, Madurai in Crl.MP No.31 of 2025 in
Crime No.111 of 2025, dated 04.03.2025.
2.This appellant is the defacto complainant in Crime No.111
of 2025 on the file of the Anna Nagar police station. He lodged a
complaint as against the respondents 3 & 4, before the Anna Nagar
police station that they have assaulted him and also abused him by
degrading his community, based on which, a case was registered in
Crime No.111 of 2025, for the offences under Sections 296(b),351(2)
of BNSS r/w 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) of SC/ST Act. The respondents 3 and 4
have moved an application in Cr.MP.No.31 of 2025, before the III
Additional District and Sessions Court (PCR), Madurai, for bail. The
trial Court, without issuing a notice as mandated under Section 15A(3)
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 07/04/2025 05:47:01 pm )
of SC/ST(POA) Act, has erroneously granted bail in favour of the
respondents 3 and 4 and therefore, the appellant/ Defacto complainant
has preferred this appeal that the order passed by the trial Court is
against law and the mandatory provisions under Section 15A(3) of
SC/ST(POA) Act.
3.The learned Government Advocate appearing for the
respondents 1 & 2, on instructions, submits that this appellant is an
advocate by profession and this complaint itself has been lodged as a
counter complaint to Crime No.112 of 2025. According to him, the
first respondent has conducted an investigation on both the complaints
and closed the same as ''mistake of fact''. RCS notice to that effect was
also served on the respective parties on 24.03.2025.
4.This Court considered the rival submissions made and also
perused the materials placed on record.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 07/04/2025 05:47:01 pm )
5.This appeal is filed as against the order of bail granted to
the respondents herein, by the trial Court in Crl.M.P.No.31 of 2025,
dated 04.03.2025. Considering the subsequent development that the
case itself has been closed as a mistake of fact, this Court is not
inclined to entertain this Criminal Appeal.
6.Accordingly, this Criminal Appeal is dismissed with liberty
to the appellant to challenge the referred charge sheet, if he is having
any grievance, in accordance with law.
01.04.2025
Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No vrn
To
1.The Assistant Commissioner of police, Anna Nagar Sub Division, Madurai District.
2.The Sub Inspector of Police, E3, Anna Nagar Police Station, Madurai – 20.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 07/04/2025 05:47:01 pm )
B.PUGALENDHI, J.,
vrn
Judgment made in
01.04.2025
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 07/04/2025 05:47:01 pm )
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!