Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 18882 Mad
Judgement Date : 25 September, 2024
S.A.No.1455 of 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 25.09.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR
S.A.No.1455 of 2011
and
M.P.No.1 of 2011
1.Elayappan
2.Saminathan ...Plaintiff / Respondents /
Appellants
-Vs-
1.Pavayi
2.Prabhu
3.Perumayi
4.Muthu
5.Dhanam ...Defendants / Appellants /
Respondents
6.Nelliappan
7.Kandassamy
8.Sathiamoorthy
9.Pushpa ...Defendants 3,5,10 & 11 /
Respondents 3 to 6 /
Respondents
Prayer:- Second Appeal preferred under 100 of CPC against the judgment
and decree dated 29.06.2011 made in A.S.No.66 of 2010 on the file of the
Additional District Court, Fast Track Court No.I, Salem, reversing the
judgment and decree dated 22.01.2010 made in O.S.No.80 of 2004 on the
file of the Sub Court, Attur.
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
S.A.No.1455 of 2011
For Appellants : No appearance
For R1, R2 & R4 : Mr.P.Jagadeesan
For R5 : Dismissed vide Court order dated
16.12.2022
For R6 : Died vide Memo filed SR.No.3187
dated 22.04.2013
For R3, R7 to R9 : No appearance
JUDGMENT
This Court, by order dated 10.09.2024, passed the following order:
“On 26.07.2024, the learned counsel for the appellants reported before this Court that he had received no instructions from his clients and subsequently, he also made an endorsement in the case bundle. Further, he also requested this Court to withdraw his appearance and the appellants names to be printed in the cause list.
2. Although the registry has printed the appellants' names, no one has entered appearance on their behalf, either in person or through counsel.
3. It is seen from the docket orders that from the year 2011 itself, the case has been adjourned without being argued by the appellants and also without any valid reasons. It reveals that the appellants are not ready to lead the case.
4. As a final opportunity, considering the interest of justice, the matter is listed after two weeks under the caption
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
“for dismissal””
2. Even though the appeal is listed under the caption “For Dismissal”
today [30.08.2024], there is no representation for the appellants. Hence, this
Court is left with no other option except to dismiss the appeal for non-
prosecution.
In the result, the Second Appeal stands dismissed for Non-
Prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is
closed.
25.09.2024 cda Index : Yes/No Speaking/Non Speaking order
To
1.The Additional District Court, Fast Track Court No.I, Salem.
2.The Sub Court, Attur.
3.The Section Officer, VR Records, High Court, Chennai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
N.SENTHILKUMAR, J.
cda
25.09.2024
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!