Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 18535 Mad
Judgement Date : 19 September, 2024
W.P No.26947 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 19.09.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR
W.P No.26947 of 2024
D.Arulmani ...Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Deputy Inspector General of Registration
Office of the Deputy Inspector General of Registration
Penpettai, Nandhanam, Chennai 600 035.
2.The District Registrar of Administration (I/C)
Kancheepuram, Kancheepuram District.
3.P.G.Rajan
4.R.Sargunam
5.R.Parimalam
6.R.Karthikeyan ...Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for
issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to dispose the
appeal filed by the petitioner on 10.03.2023, within a stipulated time as this
Court may fixes.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/5
W.P No.26947 of 2024
For Petitioner : Ms.R.Hemalatha
For Respondents : Mr.M.Shah Jahan for R1 & R2
Special Government Pleader
ORDER
The petitioner herein seeks a direction to the first respondent to
dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner dated 10.03.2023, within a time
frame fixed by this Court.
2. The petitioner herein filed an application before the second
respondent seeking cancellation of bogus documents pertains to S.No.389/2 in
Sevilimedu Village, Kancheepuram District. The application filed by the
petitioner was rejected by the District Registrar on the ground that he was not
empowered to go into the question of title and required the petitioner to go
before the Civil Court. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner preferred an
appeal before the first respondent and there is no progress in the appeal.
Therefore, the petitioner is before this court.
3. Section 77-A of the Registration Act, which enabled the
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Registering Authority to cancel the registered document, has been struck down
by the judgment in M.Kathirvel Vs The Inspector General of Registration in
W.P.Nos.10291 of 2022 and batch. In view of the same, the respondents 1 & 2
are having no power to cancel the registered document.
4. In such circumstances, the request of the petitioner made
before the second respondent was rightly rejected by the second respondent
and the first respondent has no power to pass an order of cancellation of
registered document. In such circumstances, this Court is not inclined to give
any direction to the first respondent. It is for the petitioner to workout his
remedy before the Civil Court. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No
costs.
19.09.2024
Index : Yes/No
Internet : Yes/No
Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order
dna
To
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1.The Deputy Inspector General of Registration Office of the Deputy Inspector General of Registration Penpettai, Nandhanam, Chennai 600 035.
2.The District Registrar of Administration (I/C) Kancheepuram, Kancheepuram District.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
S.SOUNTHAR, J.
dna
19.09.2024
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!