Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 18329 Mad
Judgement Date : 13 September, 2024
Tr.CMP No.450 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 13.09.2024
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN
TR.CMP No.450 of 2024
and CMP No.9280 of 2024
Arokkiyaraj …. Petitioner
-Vs-
1.Arokkiyaraj
2.Jerry Anand
3.Minor Joy Wilson
rep.by Guardian Mother
Arockiasundari …. Respondents
Prayer : Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition under Section 24 of C.P.C., to withdraw
the Execution Petition in E.P.No.53 of 2023 in O.S.No.10 of 2011 on the file of the
Principal District and Sessions Judge's Court, Ariyalur and transfer the same to the
Principal District and Sessions Court, Cuddalore.
For Petitioner : Mr.T.Sivagnanasambandan
For Respondent : Mr.T.Devaraj - for R1
R2 and R3 - No appearance
ORDER
This Transfer Petition is yet another attempt by an unsuccessful judgment
debtor to ensure that the proceedings in execution of the decree are not proceeded
with.
2. The petitioner is the defendant in O.S.No.10 of 2011 on the file of the
Principal District Judge at Perambalur. Subsequently, the suit stood transferred to the
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
file of the Principal District Judge at Ariyalur and the suit was decreed on 28.09.2012.
An appeal before this Court in A.S.No.194 of 2013 was also unsuccessful. It was
dismissed on 18.03.2021. Subsequently, the respondent / decree holder has
presented E.P.No.20 of 2021 for execution of the sale deed. It also transpires that the
sale deed has been executed. Subsequently he has initiated an execution petition for
delivery of possession in E.P.No.53 of 2023. The judgment debtor wants this
proceedings to be transferred out of the Court in Ariyalur to the Court of Principal
District and Sessions Judge at Cuddalore.
3. I have gone through the affidavit in the petition. There is absolutely no
reason why the proceedings should be transferred out of Ariyalur. There is no
allegation made against the judicial officer nor is any inconvenience pleaded by the
judgment debtor. The affidavit is bereft of any reasons.
4. Hence, I do not find any reasons to entertain the transfer petition. The
Tr.C.M.P. is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is
closed.
13.09.2024
Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No KST
To
The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Ariyalur.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.
KST
13.09.2024
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!