Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

G.Vijayakumar vs K.Murugesan
2024 Latest Caselaw 18292 Mad

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 18292 Mad
Judgement Date : 13 September, 2024

Madras High Court

G.Vijayakumar vs K.Murugesan on 13 September, 2024

Author: M.Nirmal Kumar

Bench: M. Nirmal Kumar

                                                                             Crl.R.C.No.1536 of 2024


                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                 DATED : 13.09.2024

                                                    CORAM:

                                  THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR

                                              Crl.R.C.No.1536 of 2024
                                                        and
                                              Crl.M.P.No.12820 of 2024

                  G.Vijayakumar                                              ... Petitioner

                                                          Vs.

                  K.Murugesan                                                ... Respondent



                  PRAYER: Criminal Revision filed under Sections 438 and 442 of Bharatiya
                  Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, to set aside the order dated 25.11.2022 passed by
                  the learned III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Gobichettipalayam in
                  Crl.A.No.19 of 2022 by confirming the judgment passed by the learned
                  Judicial Magistrate No.II, Gobichettipalayam in C.C.No.174 of 2017 dated
                  03.12.2021.

                                         For Petitioner   : Mr.N.Chinnaraj

                                         For Respondent : Mr.D.Prabhu Mukunth Arun kumar




                 1/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                       Crl.R.C.No.1536 of 2024


                                                             ORDER

This Criminal Revision Petition has been filed to set aside the order

dated 25.11.2022 passed by the learned III Additional District and Sessions

Judge, Gobichettipalayam in Crl.A.No.19 of 2022 by confirming the

judgment passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Gobichettipalayam

in C.C.No.174 of 2017 dated 03.12.2021.

2.This Court, on 05.09.2024, passed the following order:

This petition is filed to condone the delay of 495 days in

filing the above revision.

2.This Court, on 22.08.2024, had passed the following

order:

“The petitioner/accused in C.C. No. 174 of 2017

on the file of Judicial Magistrate No.II, Gobichettipalayam,

was convicted for the offences under Sections 138 and 142 of

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 by judgment dated

03.12.2021 and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment

for one month and the petitioner was also directed to pay

cheque amount of Rs.34,000/- to the defacto complainant.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner preferred an appeal

before the III Additional District and Sessions Court,

Gobichettipalayam, in Criminal Appeal No. 19 of 2022 and

the said appeal came to be dismissed by judgment dated

25.11.2022 thereby confirming the conviction and sentence

imposed by the Trial Court. Challenging the same, the above

criminal revision case has been filed with a delay of 495

days.

2.Learned counsel for the respondent/complainant

has filed a counter objecting to condoning the delay stating

that the cheque had been issued in the year 2017 and the

petitioner had dragged on the case successfully before the

Trial Court for more than four years and thereafter, on

conviction, preferred an appeal, which also came to be

dismissed and thus, seven years have gone by from the date

of issuance of the cheque. After having delayed the

proceedings before the Trial Court as well as before the

Lower Appellate Court on one pretext or the other, now this

revision petition has also been filed with a delay of 495 days

without the petitioner surrendering before the Trial Court.

The respondent had taken steps to secure the petitioner and

only thereafter, the present revision has been filed is the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

contention of the learned counsel for the respondent.

According to the learned counsel, though ill-health of the

petitioner has been cited as a reason for the delay in filing

the revision, no medical certificate has been produced to

substantiate the same. Therefore, the learned counsel

strongly opposed the delay being condoned.

3.This Court is also unable to accept the reason

assigned for condoning the delay. Further, the cheque is of

the year 2017 for a sum of Rs.34,000/- and the Trial Court as

well as the Lower Appellate Court have also confirmed the

conviction of the petitioner. That being so, when this Court

expressed its view that it is not inclined to entertain the

petition, at that stage, the learned counsel for the petitioner

sought time to get instructions and to revert.

4.Hence, at the request of the learned counsel for

the petitioner, post on 05.09.2024. However, it is made

clear that on the next hearing date, i.e., on 05.09.2024, if the

petitioner does not come ready with the cheque amount, the

above miscellaneous petition will not be entertained.”

3.In continuation and conjunction to the earlier order

passed by this Court on 22.08.2024, Mr.K.Prasath, learned

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that he is unable

to contact the instructing counsel from the Lower Court, hence,

seeks a week's time.

4.The learned counsel for respondent submitted that he is

ready to dispose of the revision on merits. Learned counsel for

the petitioner confirmed the same.

5.In view of the consent given by both counsels, the delay

stands condoned and the petition is ordered.

6.Registry is directed to number the Criminal Revision

Case, if it is otherwise in order and post the same 'For

Admission' on 10.09.2024.”

3.In continuation and conjunction to the earlier order passed on

05.09.2024, today, the learned counsel for petitioner/accused submitted that

petitioner is not inclined to settle the cheque amount of Rs.34,000/- despite

facing conviction by the trial Court and confirmed by the Lower Appellate

Court.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

4.The learned counsel for respondent submitted that petitioner by

filing this petition, avoiding to undergo conviction sentence of one year.

Hence, sought for a direction to the trial Court to issue conviction warrant.

5.In view of the above, this Court is not inclined to entertain this

petition, hence, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed. The trial Court

(Judicial Magistrate No.II, Gobichettypalayam) is directed to take steps for

issuing conviction warrant, secure the petitioner/accused to undergo the

period of his conviction. Consequently, connected Criminal Miscellaneous

Petition is closed.

13.09.2024

Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non Speaking Order Neutral Citation: Yes/No rsi

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

To

1.The III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Gobichettipalayam.

2.The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Gobichettipalayam.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.

rsi

and

13.09.2024

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter