Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

K.Sibi vs K.Chinnathambi
2024 Latest Caselaw 18112 Mad

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 18112 Mad
Judgement Date : 11 September, 2024

Madras High Court

K.Sibi vs K.Chinnathambi on 11 September, 2024

                                                                                   C.R.P.(PD).No.3632 of 2024


                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                      DATED : 11.09.2024

                                                          CORAM :

                              THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN

                                                C.R.P.(PD).No.3632 of 2024

                    K.Sibi                                                 .. Petitioner
                                                           Versus
                    1. K.Chinnathambi
                    2. C.Kirubanandhan
                    3. K.K.Rithanya
                    4. C.Akilandam
                    5. K.Kanagadevi                                 .. Respondents

                    Prayer : Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution
                    of India to direct the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge,
                    Namakkal to number the plaint in O.S.C.F.R.No.1571 of 2024, dated
                    26.07.2024 and proceed in accordance with law.

                                     For Petitioner      : Mr.R.T.Vishnu

                                                           ORDER

This Civil Revision Petition is at the instance of the plaintiff in

O.S.C.F.R.No.1571 of 2024. The plaint seeks for the following reliefs:-

m) jhth brhj;Jf;fis MW rk ghfkhfg;

gphpj;J. thjpf;F xU ghfj;ij gpujpthjpfs;

bfhLf;f ntz;Lbkd;W Kjy;epiy jPg;g;ghizia gpwg;gpj;Jk;.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

M) gpujpthjpfs; jtWk;gl;rj;jpy; thjp Mizah; epakd kD K:yk; ,Wjpepiy jPg;g;giz bgw;Wf; bfhs;Sk; tifapy; thjp chpikia jf;f itj;J cj;jputspj;Jk;.

,) jhth brhj;Jf;fisg; bghWj;J 05.07.2006k; Mz;L Mtz vz;.1660/2006k; Mz;L Vw;gl;l ghfg; ghfg; gphptpidg; gj;jpuk; uj;J bra;jJ bry;yhJ vd;W tpsk;gi[ f ghpfhuk; tH';fpa[k;.

<) jhth brhj;Jf;fis ,Wjpepiy jPhg;giz Vw;gLk; tiu gpujpthjp ve;j tpy;y';f tptfhu';fs; cl;gLj;jf; TlhJ vd;W epue;ju cWj;Jf;fl;lis ghpfhuk; tH';fpa[[k;.

c) jhth bryt[j; bjhifia gpujpthjpfs;

thjpf;F brYj;Jk;go cj;jputspj;Jk;. kw;Wk;

cs) ,d;Dk; rK:fk; nfhh;l;lhh; mth;fs; ,e;j tHf;F NH;epiyfSf;F crpjk; vd;W fUjf;Toa ,ju ghpfhu';fisa[k; thjpf;F Mjuthft[k;. gpujpthjpfSf;F vjpuhf[k; tH';f ePjp brYj;j ntz;Lkha; thjp gpuhh;j;jpf;fpwhh;/

2. The suit was originally presented before the learned District Munsif

at Tiruchengode. The learned District Munsif took a view that since one of

the prayers seeks for setting aside the partition deed, the proper remedy for

the parties is to seek for cancellation and present the suit before the District

Court, Namakkal. Accordingly, the petitioner/plaintiff paid the enhanced https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Court fees, corrected the plaint to that of Section 40 of the Tamil Nadu

Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1965 and presented the suit before the

District Court, Namakkal.

3. The District Court, referring to the judgment of this Court in

Tamilzhselvi and Ors. Vs. Kaliyavardhan, C.R.P(PD).No.3636 of 2017,

dated 20.04.2024, directed that the valuation of the suit is to be under

Section 25 of the Act and returned the plaint.

4. Here is an unfortunate case where the petitioner/plaintiff valued the

suit in terms of Section 25(d) of the Act and presented before the proper

Court. On account of the return, he was constrained to approach the District

Court. Today, between the two Courts, the plaint is being shuttled across.

In clear and categorical terms, the Hon'ble Mr.Justice G.K.Ilanthiraiyan held

in C.R.P.(PD).No.3636 of 2017 that seeking for setting aside a partition will

not come within the scope of Section 40 of the Act. Therefore, the return

made by the learned District Munsif itself is contrary to the view taken by

this Court.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

5. In order to give a solution to the present imbroglio, there shall be a

direction to the learned District Munsif, Tiruchengode to receive

O.S.C.F.R.No.1571 of 2024 with the prayer as couched for setting aside the

same instead of cancellation and he shall, on presentation of the plaint

within 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, number the

plaint, if it is otherwise in order and issue summons to the defendants.

6. This Civil Revision Petition is ordered accordingly. No costs.





                                                                                            11.09.2024
                    Index       : yes/no
                    Speaking order/Non-speaking order
                    Neutral Citation : yes/no
                    grs

Note:- Registry is directed to return the original plaint to the learned Counsel for the petitioner, after obtaining the usual endorsement.

To

1. The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Namakkal.

2. The District Munsif, Tiruchengode.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.

grs

11.09.2024

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter