Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

P.Sabarigiri vs The Inspector General Of Registration
2024 Latest Caselaw 17672 Mad

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 17672 Mad
Judgement Date : 5 September, 2024

Madras High Court

P.Sabarigiri vs The Inspector General Of Registration on 5 September, 2024

                                                                      W.P.No.25471 of 2024

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                               DATED : 05.09.2024

                                                     CORAM

                                   THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR

                                               W.P No.25471 of 2024


                 P.SabariGiri                                             ...Petitioner


                                                       Vs.


                 1. The Inspector General of Registration,
                    100, Santhome HighRoad, AnnamalaiPuram,
                    Chennai 600 028.

                 2. The District Registrar,
                    The District Registrar Office,
                    Gopalapuram,
                    Coimbatore 18.

                 3. The Sub – Registrar,
                    The Sub – Registration Office,
                    Anaimalai – 642 104.

                 4. M.Sivabackiam
                 5. Govindammal
                 6. Rubadevi
                 7. Santhoshkumar
                 8. Indirani @ Indira Gandhi                             ...Respondents




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                 1/5
                                                                                W.P.No.25471 of 2024

                 Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for

                 issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd respondent to register the

                 sale deed dated 23.05.2024 as pending document No.46 of 2024 as regular

                 document in Book 1 and release the document to petitioner by considering the

                 petitioner's representation dated 01.08.2024 within time frame manner.



                                        For Petitioner     : Ms.M.Vanitha
                                                             for Mr.J.Pradeep

                                        For Respondents : Mr.M.ShahJahan for R1 to R3
                                                          Special Government Pleader


                                                         ORDER

The petitioner herein seeks a direction to the third respondent to

register the sale deed dated 23.05.2024 presented for registration by

considering his representation dated 01.08.2024.

2. The petitioner herein entered into a sale transaction with the

respondents 5 & 6 for purchase of the undivided 1/2 share in the property

situated in S.F.No.234/2B at Angalakuruchi Village, Anaimalai Taluk and the

sale deed executed by the respondents 5 & 6 was presented for registration

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

before the third respondent. The right of the respondents 5 & 6 have been

declared in preliminary decree for partition passed in OS.No.164 of 2015 on

the file of the I Additional District Court, Coimbatore. When the sale deed

in favour of the petitioner was presented for registration before the third

respondent, the said document has been kept pending merely on the ground

that an appeal against the judgment and decree passed in OS.No.164 of 2015 is

pending. Therefore, the petitioner has come before this Court.

3. Mr.M.Shahjahan, learned Special Government Pleader, who

takes notice for the respondents 1 to 3 would submit that the representation of

the petitioner will be considered, on its own merits, within a time frame fixed

by this Court.

4. It is settled law mere pendency of the appeal against the

preliminary decree is not a ground to refuse the registration unless there is a

prohibitory order passed by the Court restraining the vendors of the petitioner

from alienating their share in the suit property. Any alienation by the vendors

of the petitioner, is subject to the result of the proceedings pending before the

Appellate Court. Therefore, the third respondent is directed to consider the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

representation of the petitioner dated 01.08.2024 and take a final decision on

the registration of the document within a period of two weeks from the date of

receipt of copy of this order.

5. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No

costs.




                                                                                        05.09.2024

                 Index      : Yes/No
                 Internet   : Yes/No
                 Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order
                 dna

                 To

1. The Inspector General of Registration, 100, Santhome HighRoad, Annamalai Puram, Chennai 600 028.

2. The District Registrar, The District Registrar Office, Gopalapuram, Coimbatore 18.

3. The Sub – Registrar, The Sub – Registration Office, Anaimalai – 642 104.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

S.SOUNTHAR, J.

dna

05.09.2024

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter