Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 17660 Mad
Judgement Date : 5 September, 2024
W.P(MD)No.23643 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 05.09.2024
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
W.P.(MD)No.23643 of 2023
and
W.M.P(MD)No.19812 of 2023
S.Murugan ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The General Manager,
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation
(Tirunelveli) Limited,
Thoothukudi Region,
Thoothukudi.
2.The Branch Manager,
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation
(Tirunelveli) Limited,
Thoothukudi Region,
Thoothukudi Moffusil Branch,
Thoothukudi.
3.The Branch Manager,
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation
(Tirunelveli) Limited,
Thoothukudi Region,
Sathankulam Branch,
Sathankulam,
Thoothukudi District. ... Respondents
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/4
W.P(MD)No.23643 of 2023
PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,
to issue a writ of Certiorari, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned
order of transfer in A.Aa.No.10360/Nia5/ThaAPoKa./Thili/2022, dated
20.09.2023 passed by the 1st Respondent and quash the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Guhan
For Respondents : Mr.K.Ramaiah
Standing Counsel
*****
ORDER
The instant writ petition has been filed by a Driver of the respondent
transport corporation, challenging his order of transfer from Thoothukudi
Moffusil Branch to Sathankulam branch, primarily on the ground that when a
charge memo has been issued to the writ petitioner on 15.09.2023, the present
impugned order has been passed on 20.09.2023, and therefore, it is a punitive
transfer.
2.The judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Registrar General
Vs. R.Pevachi reported in 2011 (12) SCC 137, in paragraph No.36, has held
that whenever complaints are received as against a concerned employee and
departmental proceedings are initiated, and the transfer is effected by the
management, the said transfer can never be considered to be punitive in nature.
The judgment of the Hon'ble Division Bench of our High Court of Secretary to
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Government v. Dr.S.Raja Rajan reported in 2015 (3) MLJ 769 in paragraph
No.6, has categorically held that on account of inefficiency of a Government
servant, the Government is competent to transfer and the same cannot be
considered to be punitive in nature. In the present case, merely because a charge
memo has been issued to the writ petitioner, unless the same is reflected in the
order of transfer, the same cannot be considered to be punitive in nature.
3.In the view of the above submissions, there are no merits in the writ
petition. Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed. No costs.
Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.
05.09.2024 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No RJR
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.
RJR
and
05.09.2024
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!