Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vellaiyammal vs The State Of Tamil Nadu
2024 Latest Caselaw 17629 Mad

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 17629 Mad
Judgement Date : 5 September, 2024

Madras High Court

Vellaiyammal vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 5 September, 2024

Author: S.M.Subramaniam

Bench: S.M.Subramaniam, V.Sivagnanam

                                                                                          HCP.No.1998 of 2024

                                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                       DATED : 05.09.2024

                                                             CORAM :

                              THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
                                                 AND
                                THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM

                                                      H.C.P.No.1998 of 2024

                     Vellaiyammal                                                     ... Petitioner/Mother
                                                                                             of the Detenue
                                                                  Vs.

                     1.           The State of Tamil Nadu,
                                  Rep.by its Secretary to Government,
                                  Home, Prohibition and Excise (XVI) Department,
                                  Fort St.George, Secretariat,
                                  Chennai - 600 009.

                     2.           The District Collector and District Magistrate of
                                  Vellore District, Vellore.

                     3.           The Superintendent of Police,
                                  Vellore District, Vellore.

                     4.           The Superintendent of Prison,
                                  Central Prison, Vellore,
                                  Vellore District.

                     5.           The Inspector of Police,
                                  Virinchipuram Police Station,
                                  Vellore District.                                     ... Respondents


                     Page 1 of 8


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                         HCP.No.1998 of 2024




                     PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to
                     issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, to call for the records in connection with the
                     order of detention passed by the second respondent dated 22.07.2024 in
                     C3.D.O.No.55/2024 against the petitioner's husband by name Thiru.Karthi,
                     S/o. Selvaraj, aged about 21 years, now confined at Central Prison, Vellore,
                     Vellore District and set aside the same and direct the respondents to produce
                     the above said detenue before this Court and set him at liberty.


                                        For Petitioner            : Mr.E.Kannadasan


                                        For Respondents           : Mr. E. Raj Thilak
                                                                    Additional Public Prosecutor


                                                             ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.)

The preventive detention order passed by the second respondent

dated 22.07.2024 is sought to be quashed in the present habeas corpus

petition.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as the learned

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents.

3. Though several points have been raised by the learned counsel for

the petitioner, it is stated that the detention order is liable to be quashed on

the ground that the detenu was furnished with illegible copies in volume-II

of the booklet. Hence, it is submitted that the detenu was deprived of

making effective representation.

4. On a perusal of the Booklet, it is seen that Page Nos.13 to 15 in

Volume-II of the booklet furnished to the detenue, are illegible. This

furnishing of illegible copies of the vital document would deprive the

detenu of making effective representation to the authorities against the order

of detention.

5. In this context, it is useful to refer to the judgment of the Hon'ble

Supreme Court in 'Powanammal Vs. State of Tamil Nadu' reported in

'(1999) 2 SCC 413'. The Hon'ble Supreme Court, after discussing the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

safeguards embodied in Article 22[5] of the Constitution, observed that the

detenu should be afforded an opportunity of making representation

effectively against the Detention Order and that, the failure to supply every

material in the language which can be understood by the detenu, is

imperative. In the said context, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held in

Paragraphs 9 and 16 {as in SCC journal} as follows:

“9.However, this Court has maintained a distinction between a document which has been relied upon by the detaining authority in the grounds of detention and a document which finds a mere reference in the grounds of detention. Whereas the non-supply of a copy of the document relied upon in the grounds of detention has been held to be fatal to continued detention, the detenu need not show that any prejudice is caused to him. This is because the non-supply of such a document would amount to denial of the right of being communicated the grounds and of being afforded the opportunity of making an effective representation against the order. But it would not be so where the document merely finds a reference in the order of detention or among the grounds thereof. In such a case, the detenu's complaint of non-supply of document has

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

to be supported by prejudice caused to him in making an effective representation. What applies to a document would equally apply to furnishing a translated copy of the document in the language known to and understood by the detenu, should the document be in a different language.

..... 16.For the above reasons, in our view, the non-supply of the Tamil version of the English document, on the facts and in the circumstances, renders her continued detention illegal. We, therefore, direct that the detenue be set free forthwith unless she is required to be detained in any other case. The appeal is accordingly allowed.”

6. In view of the ratio laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and in

view of the aforesaid facts, this Court is of the view that the detention order

is liable to be quashed.

7. Hence, for the aforesaid reasons, the detention order passed by the

second respondent in proceedings C3/D.O.No.55/2024 dated 22.07.2024 is

hereby set aside and the Habeas Corpus Petition is allowed. The detenu

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

viz., Karthi, S/o.Selvaraj, aged 21 years confined at Central prison, Vellore

is directed to be set at liberty forthwith, unless he is required in connection

with any other case.

                                                                   [S.M.S., J.]        [V.S.G., J.]
                                                                             05.09.2024
                     Index              :      Yes/No
                     Speaking Order     :      Yes/No
                     Neutral Citation   :      Yes/No
                     veda







https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

To

1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by its Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise (XVI) Department, Fort St.George, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.

2. The Joint Secretary to Government, Public (Law and Order) Department, Fort St.George, Chennai - 9.

3. The District Collector and District Magistrate of Vellore District, Vellore.

4. The Superintendent of Police, Vellore District, Vellore.

5. The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison, Vellore, Vellore District.

6. The Inspector of Police, Virinchipuram Police Station, Vellore District.

7. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai - 104.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

AND V.SIVAGNANAM, J.

veda

05.09.2024

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter