Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

United India Insurance Company Limited vs S. Shaheen
2024 Latest Caselaw 17626 Mad

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 17626 Mad
Judgement Date : 5 September, 2024

Madras High Court

United India Insurance Company Limited vs S. Shaheen on 5 September, 2024

Author: R.Hemalatha

Bench: R. Hemalatha

                                                                                CMA.No.2981 of 2022


                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                 DATED: 05.09.2024

                                                      CORAM:

                                  THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA

                                             C.M.A.No.2981 of 2022 and
                                              C.M.P.No.23812 of 2022

                     United India Insurance Company Limited,
                     Silingi Building, No.134, Greams Road,
                     Chennai 600 006.                                               ... Appellant

                                                           vs.
                     1. S. Shaheen
                     2. S. Sakina Banu -Minor
                     3. S. Syed Iman- Minor
                        (Respondents 2 & 3 minors are represented by their mother and natural
                         guardian the 1st respondent herein)
                     4. D. Prabakaran                                         ... Respondents

                     PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the
                     Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the Award dated 11.10.2022 in
                     M.C.O.P.4666/2019 on the file of the Chief Judge, Court of Small Causes,
                     Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chennai.

                                           For Appellant    : Mr.D. Bhaskaran
                                           For R1 to R3     : Mr. R. Dinesh Kumar
                                           R2               : No appearance.




                     1/10
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                 CMA.No.2981 of 2022




                                                   JUDGMENT

The appellant, the United India Insurance Company Limited

filed the present appeal questioning the quantum of compensation

awarded by the Tribunal in M.C.O.P.4666/2019 on the file of the Chief

Judge, Court of Small Causes, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chennai.

2. The respondents 1 to 3 /claimants filed a claim petition in

M.C.O.P.4666/2019 under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act and

Rule 3 of MACT Rules, before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal,

Chennai, seeking compensation of Rs.1,50,00,000/- for the death of one

S. Syed Ghouse (husband of the first claimant and father of the claimants

2 and 3) in a road accident that occurred on 18.06.2019.

3. The case of the claimants is that on 18.06.2019 Syed Ghouse

(since deceased) was riding his two wheeler bearing Registration Number

TN-05-BD-7718 near Sharma Nagar, Chennai and at about 10.40 hours,

a lorry bearing Registration number TN69-B-9634 belonging to one

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Prabakaran, the fourth respondent herein, hit him as a result of which

Syed Ghouse sustained injuries all over his body. He was immediately

rushed to Hospital. However, he succumbed to injuries on the way to

hospital.

4. According to the claimant, the accident took place due to the

rash and negligent driving of the driver of the lorry bearing Registration

number TN69-B-9634 and that since the said lorry was insured with the

present appellant, the United India Insurance Company Limited, the

owner and the insurer are jointly and severally liable to pay compensation

to them.

5. In the Tribunal, the fourth respondent, the owner of the

motorcycle remained absent and was set exparte. The appellant/Insurance

Company resisted the claim petition on all the grounds available to the

insurer under Section 170 of the Motor vehicles Act.

6. The Tribunal, after analysing the evidence on record,

fastened negligence on the part of the driver of the lorry and directed the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

appellant Insurance Company to pay compensation of Rs.34,55,000/- to

the claimants together with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum from the

date of petition till the date of realisation vide its orders dated

11.10.2022. The Tribunal also held that the liability of the Insurance

Company and the owner of the lorry are joint and several.

7. Aggrieved over the quantum of compensation awarded by the

Tribunal, the present appeal is filed by the appellant / United India

Insurance Company Limited.

8. Heard Mr.D. Bhaskaran, learned counsel for the appellant

and Mr. R. Dinesh Kumar, learned counsel for the respondents 1 to

3/claimants.

9. Mr.D. Bhaskaran, learned counsel for the appellant Insurance

Company contended that the claimants did not adduce any evidence to

show that the deceased was a proprietor of M/s. Sony Garments.

However, the Tribunal had fixed the notional monthly income of the

deceased as Rs.25,000/-. He therefore prayed for scaling down the Award

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

amount passed by the Tribunal.

10. Per contra, Mr. R. Dinesh Kumar, learned counsel for the

respondents 1 to 3/claimants relied on the Registration certificate of

M/s.Sony Garments (Ex.P7) and contended that the deceased was actually

running a garment shop earning a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- per month.

However, the Tribunal had fixed the notional monthly income of the

deceased only as Rs.25,000/-, which, according to him, is very much on

the lower side. He therefore prayed for enhancement of compensation.

11. The claimants though had contended that the deceased was

earning a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- per month, no documentary evidence was

adduced by them. In the circumstances, based on the Registration

Certificate of M/s.Sony Garments, it cannot be concluded that the

deceased was earning a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- per month. The accident

took place in the year 2016 and the deceased was aged 44 years.

Considering the same,the notional monthly income of the deceased is

fixed as Rs.14,000/-. As per the decision of the Supreme Court of India in

National Insurance Co. vs Pranay sethi and others reported in 2017 (2)

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

TNMAC 601, 25% is added towards future prospects of the deceased.

Since the deceased has three dependents, 1/3 should be deducted towards

his personal expenses. The deceased was aged 44 years on the date of the

accident and the proper multiplier to be adopted in the instant case is 14

as per the decision rendered in Sarla Verma and others vs. Delhi

Transport Corporation and another reported in (2009) 6 SCC 121.

Calculation

Notional Income = Rs.14,000/-

25% Future Prospects = Rs.17,500/-

After 1/3 deduction = Rs.11,666/-

Loss of dependency

= Rs.11,666/- x 12 x 14

= Rs.19,59,888/-

In addition to that the claimants are entitled to Rs.1,20,000/- (40,000 x 3),

Rs.15,000/- and Rs.15,000/- for Loss of Consortium, Loss of Estate and

Funeral Expenses respectively as per the decision in National Insurance

Co. vs Pranay sethi and others (cited supra).

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

11.1. The enhanced amount under the different heads are

detailed hereunder:

                                       S.No.                Head              Amount granted
                                                                             by this court (Rs.)
                                  1.            Loss of dependency                  19,59,888/-
                                  2.            Loss of consortium                   1,20,000/-
                                                (Rs.40,000/- x 3)
                                  3.            Funeral expenses                        15,000/-
                                  4.            Loss of Estate                          15,000/-
                                                Total                               21,09,888/-



This amount shall carry interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum from the

date of claim petition till the date of deposit.

12. In the result,

i. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is allowed. No costs.

Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

ii. The quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal is scaled

down to Rs.21,09,888/- from Rs.34,55,000/-.

iii. The appellant/Insurance company is directed to deposit a sum of

Rs.21,09,888/-with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum from the

date of claim petition till the date of deposit, within a period of

four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, to the

credit of M.A.C.T.O.P. 4666/2019 on the file of the Chief Judge,

Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chennai. The appellant is at

liberty to withdraw the excess amount, deposited by them, over

and above the compensation awarded by this court.

iv. The modified compensation amount of Rs.21,09,888/-, is

apportioned to the claimants as stated below:

S. Shaheen (first claimant) Rs.7,09,888/-

                                                                       with costs and interest
                                      Minor. S. Sakina          Banu              Rs.7,00,000/-
                                      (second claimant)
                                      Minor S. Syed Iman (third                   Rs.7,00,000/-
                                      claimant)



v. On such deposit being made, the first appellant is at liberty to

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

withdraw her share as per the apportionment made by this Court,

with costs and interest, after filing a proper petition for withdrawal.

Since the appellants 2 and 3 are minors, their share, shall be

deposited in a fixed deposit in any one of the Nationalised banks

until they attain majority.

05.09.2024 Index : Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation : Yes / No bga

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

R.HEMALATHA, J.

bga

To

1. Chief Judge, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chennai

2.The Section Officer, VR Section, Madras High Court, Chennai.

C.M.A.No.2981 of 2022 and

05.09.2024

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter