Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 17568 Mad
Judgement Date : 4 September, 2024
T.C.A.No.160 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 04.09.2024
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN
Tax Case Appeal No.160 of 2024
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax
International Taxation, Chennai. ... Appellant
Vs.
Daechang Seat Co., Ltd
C/o M/s.Daechang India Seat Co., Pvt Ltd
No.491, Mannur Village, Sriperumbudur
Village, Kanchipuram -105. ... Respondent
-----
Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961
against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai dated
05.07.2023 in I.T(TP) A.No.101/CHNY/2018.
For Appellant : Mr.Karthik Ranganathan
----
JUDGMENT
(Delivered by C.SARAVANAN,J.)
The appellant is before this Court challenging the impugned order dated
05.07.2023 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in I.T(TP)
A.No.101/CHNY/2018. By the impugned order, the appellate Tribunal has
allowed the appeal filed by the respondent assessee. The issue raised in the
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
appeal of the assessee was as regards to the order of the Assessing Officer
passed on the directions of the Dispute Resolution Panel concluding that the
guarantee fee received by the assessee to the extent of Rs.4,22,88,362/- is liable
to tax in India.
2. The dispute arose on account of the interpretation of Clause 23 of the
Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) between India and Replublic of
Korea. The said clause reads as under:
" Items of income of a resident of a Contracting State, wherever arising,
not dealt with in the foregoing Articles of this Convention, shall be taxable
only in that State."
3. The Tribunal has answered the issue as follows:
"17. In view of the above and following Article 23 of Indo-Korea DTAA
which specifically provides that taxability of 'other income' is only in the
contracting State and in the present case, the contracting State is Korea
and not India, hence taxability under the Income Tax Act is not at all
desirable. Hence, we delete the addition and allow this appeal of
assessee on this very issue. The appeal of the assessee is allowed.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
4. We find no error in the reasoning adopted by the Tribunal. As such, no
substantial question of law arises for consideration in this appeal. The appeal is
liable to be dismissed and it is accordingly dismissed. No costs.
(R.S.K.,J.) (C.S.N.,J.)
04.09.2024
NCS : Yes/No
Index : Yes/No
KST
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
R. SURESH KUMAR, J.
AND
C.SARAVANAN, J.
KST
04.09.2024
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!