Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

P.Prabakaran vs P.Udayakumar
2024 Latest Caselaw 20493 Mad

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 20493 Mad
Judgement Date : 29 October, 2024

Madras High Court

P.Prabakaran vs P.Udayakumar on 29 October, 2024

Author: M.Nirmal Kumar

Bench: M.Nirmal Kumar

                                                                                   Crl.R.C.No.519 of 2024


                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                    DATED : 29.10.2024

                                                            CORAM

                                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR

                                                   Crl.R.C.No.519 of 2024
                                                and Crl.M.P.No.15267 of 2024

                     P.Prabakaran                                              ... Petitioner

                                                             Vs.

                     P.Udayakumar                                              ... Respondent


                     PRAYER: Criminal Revision Petition filed under Section 397 r/w. 401 of
                     Cr.P.C. to set aside the judgment dated 08.12.2021 passed by the Sessions
                     Judge, Special Court for SC/ST (POA) Act, Namakkal, Namakkal District in
                     C.A.No.15 of 2021 confirming the conviction and sentence imposed by the
                     Judicial Magistrate No.I, Namakkal in C.C.No.94 of 2018 by judgment
                     dated 10.12.2020.
                                       For Petitioner   :     Mr.B.Vasudevan
                                       For Respondent   :     M/s.S.Mounika

                                                            ORDER

The petitioner was convicted by judgment, dated 10.12.2020 in

C.C.No.94 of 2018, by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Namakkal, for

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced

to undergo two years Simple Imprisonment and to pay a compensation of

Rs.60,00,000/- to the respondent within one month, in default, to undergo

one month simple imprisonment. Aggrieved over the judgment of the trial

Court, an appeal was preferred by the petitioner before the learned Sessions

Judge, Special Court for SC/ST (POA) Act, Namakkal, Namakkal

District/lower appellate Court in C.A.No.15 of 2021. The learned Sessions

Judge by judgment dated 08.12.2021 dismissed the appeal, confirming the

judgment of the trial Court, against which the present revision.

2.The gist of the case is that the petitioner borrowed Rs.54,00,000/-

from the respondent for construction of his Brahma College. Thereafter, the

petitioner did not repaid the amount. Hence, in the presence of Village

elders, a compromise was entered upon between the petitioner and the

respondent, in which, the petitioner agreed to pay Rs.60,00,000/- to the

respondent for the amount borrowed along with interest on or before

31.08.2017. The petitioner also issued three cheques for Rs.60,00,000/- to

the respondent. When the cheques were presented for encashment, the same

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

was returned for the reason 'Funds Insufficient'. After following the

statutory conditions, complaint was filed by the respondent.

3.During trial, the respondent examined himself as P.W.1 and marked

Ex.P1 to Ex.P11. On the side of the petitioner, no witness examined and no

documents marked. The trial Court on conclusion of trial found the

petitioner guilty and convicted him as stated above.

4.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that now the issue

between the petitioner and the respondent got resolved. Hence, prayed for

allowing the appeal and discharging the petitioner from the above case.

5.Today, the petitioner and the respondent appeared before this Court.

Both the parties confirmed that the issue between the petitioner and the

respondent amicably resolved and filed individual affidavit to that effect.

6.The petitioner filed compounding petition along with affidavit before

this Court in Crl.M.P.No.15267 of 2024 in Crl.R.C.No.519 of 2024

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

invoking Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 to compound

the offence and the same is ordered.

7.In the result, the case between the petitioner and the respondent is

compounded. Hence, the judgment, dated 10.12.2020 in C.C.No.94 of

2018, passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Namakkal and the

judgment dated 08.12.2021 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Special

Court for SC/ST (POA) Act, Namakkal, Namakkal District in C.A.No.15 of

2021 are set aside and the revision is allowed accordingly. The petitioner is

discharged from all charges levelled against him.

29.10.2024 Index:Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order Neutral Citation: Yes/No cse

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

To

1.The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Namakkal

2.The Sessions Judge, Special Court for SC/ST (POA) Act, Namakkal, Namakkal District

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.

cse

29.10.2024

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter