Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 19777 Mad
Judgement Date : 21 October, 2024
A.S.(MD)No.64 of 2019
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 21.10.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN
A.S.(MD)No.64 of 2019
and
C.M.P.(MD)Nos.88 & 90 of 2023
Lalith Mehta ...Appellant
vs.
1.A.R.Usha
2.A.R.Vignesh
3.A.K.Mohan
4.A.K.Chandru
5.Jwala Amarnath
6.A.A.Chitra
7.A.A.Shella
8.A.A.Nagarajan
9.A.A.Ganga
10.A.A.Radika
11.Salaja Venkatachalapathy
12.Ashalatha Jeyachandran
13.S.Sarath
14.A.K.Padmini ... Respondents
Prayer: Appeal Suit filed under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code
praying to (a) call for the records and (b) to set aside the decree and
Page 1 of 5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
A.S.(MD)No.64 of 2019
Judgment passed in O.S.No.282/2004 on the file of IV Additional
District Court at Madurai, dated 17.07.2017 as for as the findings given
as against the appellant herein.
For Appellant : No appearance
For Respondents : Mr.J.Barathan for R5 & R8
No appearance for R1 to R4, R6,
R9, R10, R14
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by P.VELMURUGAN, J.)
The sole appellant has passed away and the legal representatives
have filed C.M.P.(MD)Nos.88 and 90 of 2023 to set aside the abatement
caused due to the death of the sole appellant and to bring on record the
petitioners / proposed appellants and the proposed 15th respondent
therein as legal heirs of the deceased sole appellant.
2. When the Miscellaneous Petitions were taken up for hearing on
11.09.2024, the learned counsel who was on record for the petitioners /
proposed appellants submitted that he has handed over the bundles to the
parties. Hence, the Registry was directed to print the names of the
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
petitioners / proposed appellants and list the matter on 20.09.2024.
However, on 20.09.2024, there was no representation on their behalf.
Hence, Registry was directed to list the matter under the caption 'for
dismissal'.
3. Today, even though the matters are listed under the caption for
dismissal, there is no representation for the petitioners / proposed
appellants. Hence, the Miscellaneous Petitions are dismissed for non-
prosecution.
4. As already stated, the sole appellant passed away and the
Miscellaneous Petitions to implead the legal representatives is also
dismissed for non-prosecution. Hence, the Second Appeal is also
dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
(P.V., J.) (K.K.R.K., J.) 21.10.2024 NCC:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order mbi
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
To
1.The IV Additional District Court at Madurai.
2.The Section Officer, Vernacular Records Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
P.VELMURUGAN, J.
and K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN, J.
mbi
and C.M.P.(MD)Nos.88 & 90 of 2023
21.10.2024
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!