Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M.Arunkumar vs The Director
2024 Latest Caselaw 19226 Mad

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 19226 Mad
Judgement Date : 3 October, 2024

Madras High Court

M.Arunkumar vs The Director on 3 October, 2024

Author: N.Anand Venkatesh

Bench: N.Anand Venkatesh

                                                                           W.P.No.29080 of 2024

                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                               DATED : 03.10.2024

                                                       CORAM

                          THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH

                                              W.P.No.29080 of 2024
                                                      and
                                             W.M.P.No.31734 of 2024

                     M.Arunkumar,
                     Hospital Worker,
                     Government Primary Health Centre,
                     Nandhivaram, Chengalpattu District.                        .. Petitioner

                                                         Vs.

                     1.The Director,
                       Directorate of Public Health and Preventive Medicine,
                       Teynampet, Chennai – 600 006.

                     2.The Joint Director (Administration),
                       Directorate of Public Health and Preventive Medicine,
                       Teynampet, Chennai – 600 006.

                     3.The Deputy Director of Health Services,
                       Saidapet,
                       Chennai – 600 015.                                .. Respondents

                     Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
                     praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records
                     of the 1st respondent dated 07.01.2022 passed in R.No.96226/E4/S3/2021
                     and quash the same and consequently direct the 1 st respondent to appoint
                     the petitioner in the post of Junior Assistant with retrospective effect from
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                     1/6
                                                                                W.P.No.29080 of 2024

                     the date of appointment along with all backwages, continuity of service
                     and other benefit.


                                        For petitioner     :     Mr.V.S.Senthil Kumar

                                        For Respondents :        Mr.M.Bindran
                                                                 Additional Government Pleader

                                                           ORDER

This writ petition has been filed challenging the proceedings of the

1st respondent dated 07.01.2022 and for a consequential direction to the

1st respondent to appoint the petitioner in the post of Junior Assistant with

retrospective effect from the date of his appointment along with all

attendant benefits.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned

Additional Government Pleader for the respondents.

3.The father of the petitioner was employed as Night Watchman in

the respondent department. He died in harness on 02.09.2003 while he

was in service at Government Primary Health Centre, Sadras,

Thirukazhukundram Block. The petitioner submitted an application

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

seeking for compassionate appointment and the 3rd respondent through

proceedings dated 18.11.2011, appointed the petitioner as Hospital

Worker in the Nandhivaram Primary Health Centre with effect from

25.11.2011.

4.The grievance of the petitioner is that he had completed relevant

qualification and he was eligible to be appointed as Junior Assistant.

However, the petitioner has been given the lower most cadre. Hence, he

made a representation. The same was rejected by the 1st respondent

through proceedings dated 07.01.2022. Aggrieved by the same, the

present writ petition has been filed.

5.In the considered view of this Court, the order passed by the 1st

respondent does not suffer from any illegality. When the petitioner

accepted the appointment on compassionate ground, the petitioner was

aware of the fact that he was appointed as Hospital Worker. Having

entered appointment, at a later point of time, the petitioner is now turning

around and seeking for a higher post from the date of his appointment.

The same has been rightly rejected by the 1st respondent. For proper

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

appreciation, paragraph No.8 of the order dated 07.01.2022 is extracted

hereunder:

“8) In view of the facts and circumstances stated above in this case and also as per the Division Bench Judgment order dated : 13.02.2012 made in W.A.No.165 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 mentioned above, Thiru.M.Arunkumar S/o.(late) Thiru.K.Murugaiyan is informed that in this case with all eyes open he had accepted the appointment given to him due to his indigent circumstances of the family and now requesting for appointment to the post of Junior Assistant with effect from the date of his appointment in the lower post on compassionate ground is against the principle of natural justice. He is further informed that by virtue of giving such request, he was able to secure the appointment on compassionate ground earlier than the persons who opted to wait for their turn to be considered for appointment on compassionate ground. As such, Thiru.M.Arunkumar S/o(late) Thiru.K.Murugaiyan is informed that he is not eligible for appointment to the post of Junior Assistant with effect from the date of his appointment in the lower post on compassionate ground as requested in his representation dated: 10.06.2016. However, he is further informed that he will get his chances of promotion to the post of Junior Assistant by the method of recruitment by transfer only as per the order of his seniority in lower post after the completion of seven years in the present post as per the Government orders in force.” https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

6.The 1st respondent has properly dealt with the representation

made by the petitioner and the petitioner has been informed that his claim

for Junior Assistant will be considered only according to his seniority.

7.In the light of the above discussion, this Court does not find any

merits in this Writ Petition. Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands

dismissed. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

No costs.




                                                                                     03.10.2024
                                                                                         (2/2)

                     krk
                     Index                    : Yes / No
                     Internet                 : Yes / No
                     Neutral Citation         : Yes / No

                     To

                     1.The Director,

Directorate of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Teynampet, Chennai – 600 006.

2.The Joint Director (Administration), Directorate of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Teynampet, Chennai – 600 006.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

3.The Deputy Director of Health Services, Saidapet, Chennai – 600 015.

N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.

krk

03.10.2024 (2/2) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter