Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Tvl.Bharath Paper Company vs The Deputy State Tax Officer-I
2024 Latest Caselaw 21834 Mad

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 21834 Mad
Judgement Date : 21 November, 2024

Madras High Court

Tvl.Bharath Paper Company vs The Deputy State Tax Officer-I on 21 November, 2024

Author: Mohammed Shaffiq

Bench: Mohammed Shaffiq

                                                                             W.P.No.33920 of 2024

                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                             DATED : 21.11.2024

                                                   CORAM

                           THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ

                                           W.P.No.33920 of 2024
                                                   and
                                  W.M.P.Nos.36735, 36738 and 36739 of 2024

               Tvl.Bharath Paper Company
               Rep. by its proprietor R.Bharath,
               11, Anderson Street,
               George Town,
               Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 001.                              ..Petitioner

                                                    Vs.


               1.The Deputy State Tax Officer-I,
                 Loansquare Assessment Circle,
                Integrated Buildings for Commercial Taxes Department,
                Chennai North Division,
                No.32, Elephant Gate Bridge Road,
                Chennai 600 003.

               2.The Assistant Commissioner (State Tax),
                 Loansquare Assessment Circle,
                 Integrated Buildings for Commercial Taxes Department,
                 Chennai North Division,
                 No.32, Elephant Gate Bridge Road,
                 Chennai 600 003.                                        ..Respondents




               1/7
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                     W.P.No.33920 of 2024

               PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,

               praying to issue Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the first respondent in

               Form GST DRC-07 with Reference No. ZD331223118625Q dated 16.12.2023

               passed under section 73 of the TNGST Act, 2017 and quash the same as illegal,

               devoid of merits and against principles of natural justice.


                                  For Petitioner    : Mr.M.Varun Pandian

                                  For Respondents   : Mr.C.Harsha Raj,
                                                      Additional Government Pleader.

                                                       ORDER

The present writ petition is filed challenging the impugned order passed by

the first respondent dated 16.12.2023 relating to the assessment year 2017-18.

2. The petitioner is engaged in retail business of trading in paper and paper

boards, printed books, printed or illustrated postcards or illustrated postcards,

wedding cards and is a registered dealer under the Goods and Services Act, 2017.

During the relevant period, the petitioner filed its return and paid the appropriate

taxes. However, during the scrutiny of the petitioner's return, it was found that

there was excess input tax credit availed as compared to RCM. Subsequently, a

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

notice was issued to the petitioner in Form GST ASMT 10 on 31.08.2023,

followed by a Show Cause Notice dated 26.09.2023. A personal hearing was

offered on 18.11.2023. However, the petitioner had neither filed its reply nor

availed personal hearing. Hence, the impugned order came to be passed,

confirming the proposal.

3. The impugned order is challenged on the premise that neither the show

cause notices nor the impugned order of assessment have been served by tendering

to the petitioner or by registered post, instead it was uploaded in the common

portal. It was further submitted that the petitioner was unable to access the

common portal and thus was unable to participate in the adjudication proceedings.

4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that if the

petitioner is provided with an opportunity, they would be able to explain the

alleged discrepancies. The learned counsel for the petitioner would then place

reliance upon the recent judgment of this Court in the case of

M/s.K.Balakrishnan, Balu Cables vs. O/o. the Assistant Commissioner of GST

& Central Excise in W.P.(MD)No.11924 of 2024 dated 10.06.2024. It was

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

further submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to pay 25% of the

disputed tax and that they may be granted one final opportunity before the

adjudicating authority to put forth their objections to the proposal. It is further

submitted that subsequent to the passing of the impugned order, the petitioner has

remitted amounts in excess of the admitted tax and his only request is that the same

may be adjusted towards 25% of the disputed tax. It is further submitted that there

is bank attachment and the same may be lifted, to which, the learned Additional

Government Pleader appearing for the respondents does not have any serious

objection.

5. In view thereof, the impugned order is set aside and the petitioner shall

deposit 25% of the disputed tax within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of

receipt of a copy of this order. The respondent authority shall take into account the

amount remitted by the petitioner in excess of the admitted tax, while reckoning

25% of the disputed tax. On complying with the above condition, the impugned

order of assessment shall be treated as show cause notice and the petitioner shall

submit its objections within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a

copy of this order along with supporting documents/material. If any such

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

objections are filed, the same shall be considered by the respondent and orders

shall be passed in accordance with law after affording a reasonable opportunity of

hearing to the petitioner. If the above deposit is not paid or objections are not filed

within the stipulated period, i.e., two weeks and four weeks respectively from the

date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order of assessment shall

stand restored. It was submitted that pursuant to the impugned order of assessment,

recovery proceedings were initiated and bank accounts have been attached. In

view of the order passed herein, the bank attachment shall be lifted forthwith on

complying with the above condition i.e., payment of 25% of disputed taxes within

a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order

as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

21.11.2024

Speaking (or) Non Speaking Order Neutral Citation: Yes/No shk

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.

shk To

1.The Deputy State Tax Officer-I, Loansquare Assessment Circle, Integrated Buildings for Commercial Taxes Department, Chennai North Division, No.32, Elephant Gate Bridge Road, Chennai 600 003.

2.The Assistant Commissioner (State Tax), Loansquare Assessment Circle, Integrated Buildings for Commercial Taxes Department, Chennai North Division, No.32, Elephant Gate Bridge Road, Chennai 600 003.

and W.M.P.Nos.36735, 36738 and 36739 of 2024

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

21.11.2024

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter