Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 21592 Mad
Judgement Date : 13 November, 2024
C.R.P.[NPD].No.4548 of 2024
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Date : 13.11.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR
C.R.P.[NPD].No.4548 of 2024
P.G.Murugesan . . . Petitioner
Versus
Dhakshyani @ Vishalakshi . . . Respondent
PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India to set
aside the Order dated 08.03.2024 made in ARD No.2 of 2023 in O.S.No.2 of
2009 on the file of the Additional District Judge, Dharmapuri.
For petitioner : Mr.J.Nandagopal
ORDER
Challenging the Order of dismissal of the application filed to return
the documents Ex.B.10 to Ex.B.15 said to have been exhibited in O.S.No.2
of 2009, the Civil Revision Petition has been filed.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
2. The suit in O.S.No.2 of 2009 has been filed by the plaintiff for
partition claiming 1/4th share in the suit property. In the above suit, the
present revision petitioner has been arrayed as fourth defendant. The
revision petitioner filed a suit in O.S.No.116 of 2010 for the relief of
declaration and permanent injunction. Since the parties in both the suits and
the suit properties are one and the same, both the suits were disposed of by
way of a common judgment dated 29.02.2012, wherein the original suit filed
in O.S.No.2 of 2009 has been dismissed whereas the suit filed by the
revision petitioner in O.S.No.116 of 2010 has been decreed in his favour. As
against which four appeals in A.S.Nos.1010 of 2012, 1019 of 2012, 1054 of
2012 and 1068 of 2012 have been filed and it appears that the appeal in
A.S.No.1068 of 2012 has been dismissed for default and the other appeals
are pending before this Court. At this stage, the revision petitioner has filed
an application before the trial Court for return of Ex.B.10 to Ex.B.15 filed in
O.S.No.2 of 2009. The trial Court taking note of the fact that the appeals are
pending and the documents are required in the appeal, dismissed the said
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
application. Challenging the same, the present revision petition has been
filed.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.
4. As the appeals are pending before this Court, the trial Court
cannot return the documents. If at all the petitioner wants to get back the
documents, it is for the revision petitioner to approach the appellate Court
and file an application in this regard. Hence, I do not find any merits in this
revision petition.
5. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs.
13.11.2024
Index : Yes / No Internet: Yes Speaking/non speaking order vrc
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
N. SATHISH KUMAR, J.
vrc
13.11.2024
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!