Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 20929 Mad
Judgement Date : 4 November, 2024
Crl.O.P.(MD) No.18940 of 2024
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 04.11.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.18940 of 2024
and
Crl.M.P.(MD) No.11720 of 2024
Mahalakshmi ... Petitioner
-vs-
1.The State of Tamil Nadu,
The Inspector of Police,
South Gate Police Station,
Madurai City.
(Crime No.124 of 2022)
2.K.Murugesan ... Respondents
Petition filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita,
2023, seeking to call for the records relating to the impugned F.I.R. in Crime No.
124 of 2022, on the file of the first respondent Police, and quash the same as far
as the petitioner is concerned.
____________
Page 1 of 5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.(MD) No.18940 of 2024
For Petitioner : Mr.A.Jayaramachandran
For R1 : Mr.A.Thiruvadi Kumar
Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER
The petitioner/A5 filed the Criminal Original Petition seeking to quash
the F.I.R. in Crime No.124 of 2022, for the offences under Sections 143, 341 and
291 I.P.C. and Section 71A(1) of the Tamil Nadu City Police Act, 1888, on the
file of the first respondent Police.
2. The case of the prosecution is that on 31.03.2022 at about 04.00 p.m.,
the respondent Police was on patrol duty, at that time, one Fathima Kani, State
Secretary of Woman India Movement and other Organizations like, NWF along
with other political parties, had formed an unlawful assembly in the busy public
area and raised slogans in a stage against the judgment of the Karnataka High
Court, banning of wearing Hijab at the Educational Institution and caused
disturbance to the Public at large. Hence, the complaint has been lodged against
the petitioner and others.
____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD) No.18940 of 2024
3. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the
petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and no prima facie case has
been made out as against the petitioner to invoke Sections 143, 341 and 291 I.P.C.
and Section 71A(1) of the Tamil Nadu City Police Act, 1888. He further
submitted that the petitioner and others had only expressed their dissent against
the ban to wear Hijab in the Educational Institution in a democratic manner,
which did not cause any sort of nuisance or disturbance to the public at large.
4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the first
respondent submitted that after investigation, the respondent Police closed the
case as ''further action dropped'' and on 02.02.2024, the respondent Police also
filed a final report before the Judicial Magistrate Court No.V, Madurai, to that
effect. A copy of the closure report also produced before this Court.
5. Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition is closed.
Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is also closed.
NCC : Yes / No 04.11.2024
Index : Yes / No
smn2
____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.(MD) No.18940 of 2024
To:-
1.The Inspector of Police,
South Gate Police Station,
Madurai City.
2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD) No.18940 of 2024
M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.
smn2
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.18940 of 2024 and Crl.M.P.(MD) No.11720 of 2024
04.11.2024
____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!