Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Harikrishnan vs The State Of Tamil Nadu
2024 Latest Caselaw 8175 Mad

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 8175 Mad
Judgement Date : 3 June, 2024

Madras High Court

Harikrishnan vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 3 June, 2024

Author: R.Vijayakumar

Bench: R.Vijayakumar

                                                                        C.R.P(MD)No.729 of 2018



                           BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                DATED: 03.06.2024

                                                    CORAM

                                  THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR

                                           C.R.P(MD)No.729 of 2018
                                                    and
                                          C.M.P(MD)No.3172 of 2018

                     Harikrishnan                              ... Petitioner/Petitioner
                                                                      Plaintiff

                                                       Vs.

                     1.The State of Tamil Nadu,
                       Represented by its
                       District Collector,
                       Madurai.

                     2.The Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and
                           Charitable Endowments Department,
                       Represented by its Commissioner,
                       Chennai.

                     3.The Executive Officer,
                       Vinayakar Kovil,
                       Elumalai,
                       Peraiyur Taluk,
                       Madurai District.                       ... Respondents 1 to 3/
                                                                   Respondents 1 to 3/
                                                                   Defendants 1 to 3


                     1/7



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                           C.R.P(MD)No.729 of 2018

                     4.Pappathi

                     5.Vaasimalai

                     6.Nagaraj

                     7.Pitchairaja

                     8.Easwaran

                     9.Kannan

                     10.Nagendiran

                     11.Rameshbabu

                     12.Nagaiah Samy

                     13.Subburaj

                     14.Pathrakali

                     15.Ganesan                                    ... Respondents 4 to 15/
                                                               Proposed Respondents 4 to 15/
                                                                 Proposed defendants 4 to 15

                     PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the
                     Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order passed by
                     the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate at Peraiyur, dated
                     26.02.2018 in I.A.No.100 of 2016 in O.S.No.530 of 2014.




                     2/7



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                 C.R.P(MD)No.729 of 2018




                                         For Petitioner     : M/s.A.Niveditha
                                                              for Mr.S.Madhavan

                                         For R-1            : Mr.C.Satheesh
                                                              Government Advocate

                                         For R-2            : Mr.P.Subbaraj
                                                              Special Government Pleader

                                         For R-3            : Mr.S.Manohar

                                         For R-5 & R-14     : No appearance

                                         R-4, R-6 to R-10
                                              & R-15      : Died


                                                          ORDER

The present revision petition has been filed by the plaintiff in

O.S.No.530 of 2014 challenging an order wherein, the Trial Court has

rejected an application to implead the vendors of the plaintiff.

2. The petitioner herein as plaintiff has filed the above said suit

before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court at Peraiyur for

the relief of declaration of title and permanent injunction.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

3. Originally the State of Tamil Nadu, Tamil Nadu Hindu

Religious and Charitable Endowments Department and Executive Officer

of Vinayagar Koil, Elumalai were impleaded as defendants 1 to 3 in the

suit. They have filed a written statement contending that the vendors of

the plaintiff do not have any title to alienate the same in favour of the

plaintiff. Within five months from the date of filing of the said petition,

the plaintiffs have filed I.A.No.100 of 2016 for impleading his vendors.

The said application has been dismissed by the Trial Court on the ground

that, the plaintiff is not seeking any prayer as against his vendors and

therefore, his vendors could be examined as witnesses on the side of the

plaintiff to prove the title. This order is under challenge in the present

revision petition.

4. The learned Counsel appearing for the revision petitioner has

relied upon an order of this Court, dated 16.10.2023 in C.R.P(MD)No.

2013 of 2017. The said revision petition was filed by another person as

against the same Temple, who is owning the adjacent property. In the

said suit also, an attempt was made to impead the vendors of the plaintiff

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

and the same was rejected. This Court in the above said order had relied

upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India reported in

1992 (2) SSC 524 [Ramesh Hiranand Kundanmal Vs. Municipal

Corporation of Greater Bombay and Others] and the judgment of this

Court in 2013 (2) MWN (Civil) 510 [Alladi Staram Vs. P.L.Finance

and Investment and Limited and Others] and has proceeded to allow the

revision petition, permitting the plaintiff therein to implead his vendors.

Since the present plaintiff is also similarly placed person, this Court is

inclined to allow the present revision petition.

5. The order of the Trial Court in I.A.No.100 of 2016 is hereby set

aside and the said application stands allowed. Hence, this Civil Revision

Petition stands allowed. There shall be no order as to costs.

Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition stands closed.




                                                                                     03.06.2024

                     NCC      : Yes / No
                     Index    : Yes / No
                     Internet : Yes
                     BTR





https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

To

1.The District Collector, The State of Tamil Nadu, Madurai.

2.The Commissioner, The Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Chennai.

3.The Executive Officer, Vinayakar Kovil, Elumalai, Peraiyur Taluk, Madurai District.

4.The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Peraiyur.

5.The Section Officer, Vernacular Record Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.

BTR

Order made in

03.06.2024

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter