Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 410 Mad
Judgement Date : 5 January, 2024
W.A.(MD).No.888 of 2016
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 05.01.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN
W.A.(MD).No.888 of 2016
and
C.M.P.(MD).No.5357 of 2016
1.The State of Tamil Nadu,
Represented by the District Collector,
Nagercoil.
2.The Tahsildar,
Kalkulam Taluk,
Kanyakumari District.
3.The District Forest Officer,
Kanyakumari District,
Nagercoil. .. Appellants/Respondents 1 to 3
Vs.
1.Swarna Sethuraman
2.Babu .. Respondents 1 and 2/Writ Petitioners
Page 1 of 5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.(MD).No.888 of 2016
3.Rashme Aras
4.Preethi Aras .. Respondents 3 and 4/ Respondents 4 and 5
PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, praying to
set aside the order dated 09.02.2009 made in W.P.(MD).No.11432 of 2005
and allow the Writ Appeal.
For Appellants : Mr.D.Sachikumar
Additional Government Pleader
For Respondent : Mr.G.Thalaimutharasu
JUDGMENT
DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J.
and C.KUMARAPPAN,J.
This Writ Appeal is filed by the State being aggrieved by the order
passed in W.P.(MD).No.11432 of 2005 dated 09.02.2009.
2. The Writ Appeal pertains to issuance of Mandamus regarding grant
of patta in favour of the respondents 1 and 2/writ petitioners. The writ
petitioners based their rights based on the decree of the Civil Court. Despite
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
obtaining decree, the authorities did not grant patta. Hence, the Writ
Petition seeking a writ of Mandamus was filed and the same was allowed by
this Court on 09.02.2009. Against which, the State has preferred the present
Writ Appeal on the ground that the decree of the Civil Court has not attained
finality as the State has preferred a Second Appeal, which is pending before
this Court.
3. When the matter came up for final disposal in an earlier occasion
before this Court, the learned Special Government Pleader submitted that
the Second Appeal in S.A.(MD).No.501 of 2015 preferred by the State
against the decree in favour of the respondents was admitted and interim
stay was granted.
4. Admittedly, the Second Appeal in S.A.(MD).No.501 of 2015 is
pending for disposal. In view of the above fact, the impugned order passed
in W.P.(MD).No.11432 of 2005 dated 09.02.2009 is liable to be set aside.
Hence, the Writ Appeal preferred by the State is allowed with liberty to the
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
respondents 1 and 2/writ petitioners to work out their remedy in accordance
with law after the disposal of the Second Appeal in S.A.(MD).No.501 of
2015. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected
miscellaneous petition stands closed.
(G.J.,J.) (C.K.,J.)
05.01.2024
NCC : Yes / No
Index : Yes / No
Internet : Yes / No
Lm
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J.
and C.KUMARAPPAN,J.
Lm
05.01.2024
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!