Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 15752 Mad
Judgement Date : 13 August, 2024
Crl.R.C.No.708 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 13.08.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR
Crl.R.C.No.708 of 2022
N.Veeramanikandaraja ... Petitioner
Vs.
The State Rep. by
The Inspector of Police,
R-2, Perur Police Station,
Coimbatore.
(Crime No.17 of 2015) ... Respondent
Prayer: Criminal Revision Petition filed under Sections 397 and 401 of
Cr.P.C., praying to call for the entire records relating to the judgment in
Crl.A.No.132 of 2019 dated 14.02.2022 passed by the learned III Additional
District and Sessions Court, Coimbatore, confirming the judgment in
C.C.No.49 of 2015 dated 06.03.2019 passed by the learned Judicial
Magistrate No.I, Coimbatore and set aside the same.
For Petitioner : No appearance
For Respondent : Mr.A.Damodaran
Additional Public Prosecutor
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.R.C.No.708 of 2022
ORDER
The petitioner was convicted by the trial Court by judgment dated
06.03.2019 in C.C.No.49 of 2015 and sentenced to undergo six months
rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- for offence under
Section 279 of I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo two years rigorous
imprisonment and to pay fine of Rs.5,000/- for offence under Section 304(A)
of I.P.C. Aggrieved against the said order, he preferred an appeal in
Crl.A.No.132 of 2019 before the learned III Additional District and Sessions
Judge, Coimbatore. The learned Sessions Judge, by judgment dated
14.02.2022, dismissed the appeal confirming the conviction and sentence of
the trial Court, against which, the present revision has been filed.
2.When the case was listed on 07.08.2024, there was no representation
on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, in order to give one more opportunity to
the petitioner to argue the case, the matter was directed to be listed under the
caption 'For Dismissal' on 13.08.2024. Accordingly, this case was listed
today under the caption 'For dismissal'.
3.Even today (i.e. on 13.08.2024), there is no representation for the
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
petitioner either in person or through his counsel.
4.Hence, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed for
non-prosecution.
5.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor is informed that no
protection order has been given to the petitioner. Hence, the respondent
police is directed to secure the petitioner/accused for the accused to undergo
conviction.
13.08.2024
Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non Speaking Order Neutral Citation: Yes/No rsi
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.
rsi
To
1.The Inspector of Police, R-2, Perur Police Station, Coimbatore.
2.The III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore.
3.The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Coimbatore.
4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
13.08.2024
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!