Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 15642 Mad
Judgement Date : 12 August, 2024
Crl.O.P.Nos.8893, 9032, 9033, 9035, 9030 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated: 12.08.2024
Coram:
THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN
Crl.O.P.Nos.8893, 9032, 9033, 9035 & 9030 of 2024
& Crl.M.P.Nos.6370, 6401, 6402, 6403 & 6400 of 2024
Crl.O.P.No.8893 of 2024 batch
Thiru.P.Elayaraja. ... Petitioner/Complainant
/versus/
Thiru.R.Shanmugam. ... Respondent/Accused
Prayer: Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 482 of the
Criminal Procedure Code, to set aside the order dated 04.03.2024 passed by
Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court, Attur in Crl.M.P.No.2 of 2024 in
STC.No.22 of 2021 and pass orders.
For Petitioner : Mr.SP.Chockalingam
For Respondent : Mr.J.Prithivi
Page No.1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.Nos.8893, 9032, 9033, 9035, 9030 of 2024
COMMON ORDER
The petitions filed by the accused under Section 311 of Cr.P.C to
recall the witness, allowed by the trial Court on condition that the
petitioner/accused shall pay a sum of Rs.5000/- for each of the witness. Since, it
was the third recall petition and filed to drag the proceedings, the complainant has
filed the present instant Criminal Original Petitions to set aside the order passed by
the Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court, Attur, Salem District.
2. The Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that
after examination of witness as early as 03.09.2021, the accused filed recall
petition on 06.10.2021, witnesses were recalled. On completion of trial, case was
reserved for judgment on 21.04.2022 and thereafter, another application for
examining the document under Section 45 of Evidence Act was filed, the matter
was dragged for two years and then came to end. At this juncture, the 3rd petition
to recall has been filed and allowed, though it was allowed on costs, it has no
deterrent effect on the complainant because his intention is to drag on the case
endlessly.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.Nos.8893, 9032, 9033, 9035, 9030 of 2024
3. The Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in
view of the interim stay granted by this Court, the petitioners were not able to pay
the costs and they are ready to pay the costs and examine the witness on the date
of their appearance and will not seek for any further adjournment. To allege the
apprehension of the petitioners, it is suffice to direct the respondent herein to
immediately pay the costs to the defacto complainant and on receipt of the costs,
the petitioner shall be present before the trial Court on the next hearing date and
subject himself for cross examination. If the respondent fail to cross examine the
witness on the day on which the complainant present, the respondent shall lose the
right to recall the witness. The trial Court shall proceed further and complete the
trial preferably within a period of one month.
4. Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petitions are disposed
of. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
12.08.2024
Index :Yes/No.
Internet :Yes/No.
bsm
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.Nos.8893, 9032, 9033, 9035, 9030 of 2024
Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.
bsm To:-
1. The Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court, Attur.
Crl.O.P.Nos.8893, 9032, 9033, 9035, 9030 of 2024
12.08.2024
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!