Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 15533 Mad
Judgement Date : 9 August, 2024
W.P(MD).No.11501 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 09.08.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
W.P(MD).No.11501 of 2021
and W.M.P(MD).No.9033 of 2021
A.Chinna Rani Jesintha ... Petitioner
Vs.,
1.The District Registrar,
Thoothukudi District.
2.Jean Prabhu ... Respondents
PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a
Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the impugned notice in Na.Ka.No.
2830/B4/2021 dated 28.06.2021 on the file of the first respondent and quash the
same.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Vinoharan
For Respondents : Mr.P.Subbaraj (for R1)
Special Government Pleader
Mr.N.Karthikkannan (for R2)
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P(MD).No.11501 of 2021
ORDER
Challenging the impugned notice issued by the first respondent in
Na.Ka.No.2830/B4/2021, dated 28.06.2021, this writ petition has been filed.
2. The case of the petitioner is that originally the subject property
belongs to his father and during his lifetime, he divided the property into three
portions bearing Door Nos.88A, 88B and 88C and by a settlement deed dated
21.12.1964, he settled Door No.88A in favour of the petitioner. Thereafter, the
petitioner intended to sell his property and sold it in favour of one Kumar @
Appukuttan, on 07.05.2003. On the complaint given by the second respondent,
who is none other than the son of petitioner's sister, dated 21.06.2021, for
cancelling the sale deed executed by the petitioner on the ground that the
petitioner has no right to sell the property, the first respondent issued the
impugned notice. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner is before this Court.
3. Heard both sides.
4. As the power to cancel the sale deed is not vested with the first
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
respondent, which has been settled in catena of judgments and one such judgment
in the case of Satya Pal Anand v. State of M.P., reported in (2016) 10 SCC 767
has held that some irregularity in the procedure committed during the registration
process would not lead to a fraudulent execution and registration of the document,
but a case of mere irregularity. In either case, the party aggrieved by such
registration of document is free to challenge its validity before the Civil Court, the
impugned notice issued by the first respondent in Na.Ka.No.2830/B4/2021, dated
28.06.2021 is hereby quashed and the Writ Petition is allowed. No costs.
Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
09.08.2024
(1/2)
NCC : Yes/No
Index : Yes/No
Rmk
To
The District Registrar,
Thoothukudi District.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.
Rmk
09.08.2024
(1/2)
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!