Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 15455 Mad
Judgement Date : 8 August, 2024
C.R.P.(PD).No.3152 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 08.08.2024
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN
C.R.P.(PD).No.3152 of 2024
and C.M.P.Nos.16856 & 16857 of 2024
Balasubramaniyan ... Petitioner/1st Respondent
-Versus-
1.G.Radhika ... 1st Respondent/Petitioner
2.Poongothai
3.Prakash
4.Priya ... Respondents 2 to 4 /Respondents 2 to 4
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of
India, to quash the complaint against the petitioner pending before the District
Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Pochampalli in D.V.C.No.1 of 2024.
For the Petitioner : Mr.S.N.Arunkumar
ORDER
This Civil Revision Petition has been filed challenging the D.V.C.No.1
of 2024 pending on the file of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate at
Pochampalli.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1 of 4
2. The Civil Revision Petitioner is the husband. There is no dispute that
the petitioner and the 1st respondent entered into matrimony on 23.03.2011.
Thereafter because of disputes and differences, the parties have separated and
they have approached several forums, including police, stating that the husband
has retained 50 sovereigns of gold jewels belonging to the wife and claiming
monetary compensation of Rs.20,000/- per month and compensation of Rs.5
Lakhs under Sections 19,20 and 22 of the Protection of Women from Domestic
Violence Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act').
3.The wife has moved the the complaint in D.V.C.No.1 of 2024 before
the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Pochampalli. The husband
has moved this revision stating that the allegations are general in nature and
they do not make out a case under the Act.
4. My reading of the complaint shows that through paragraph Nos. 7 and
8 specific allegations are made against the husband.
5. The Supreme Court of India in Inderjit Singh Grewal Vs. State of
Punjab and Ors., (2012 Crl L. J 309) speaking through Justice P.Sathasivam
(as he then was) has held that if the reading of the complaint makes out a prima
facie case against the Civil Revision Petitioner, then the Court should not
normally interfere with the same. Following the Judgment, I am of the view
that the Civil Revision Petition does not deserve admission. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2 of 4
6. At this stage, Mr.S.N.Arunkumar states that the dispute itself is very
limited in nature. He would point out that the relationship between the
petitioner and the 1st respondent was a romantic relationship before the
marriage. He would state that there is every possibility of settlement of the
matter, in case, it is referred to mediation.
7. In the light of the above submission of the learned counsel for the
petitioner, the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli is
requested to find out whether the matter is capable of being referred to
mediation centre, for settlement. If he comes to a conclusion, he shall refer the
matter to the District Mediation Centre at Krishnagiri.
8. With the above direction, this Civil Revision Petition stands
dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are
closed.
08.08.2024
Jer
Index : Yes / No
Internet : Yes / No
Neutral Citation : Yes / No
Speaking / Non Speaking Order
To
The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Pochampalli.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3 of 4
V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J., Jer
08.08.2024
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4 of 4
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!