Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

S.Madasamy vs The State Of Tamil Nadu
2024 Latest Caselaw 15348 Mad

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 15348 Mad
Judgement Date : 8 August, 2024

Madras High Court

S.Madasamy vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 8 August, 2024

Author: R.Subramanian

Bench: R.Subramanian

                                                                         W.P.(MD) No.9055 of 2008



                            BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                               DATED : 08.08.2024

                                                     CORAM:

                                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
                                                     and
                                  THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI

                                             W.P.(MD) No.9055 of 2008

                1.S.Madasamy
                2.V.Pandiammal
                3.Poongodi
                4.S.Pandi                                           ... Petitioners

                                                       -vs-


                1.The State of Tamil Nadu,
                  Represented by its Secretary,
                  Department of Revenue,
                  (Land Development),
                  Fort. St. George, Chennai - 9.

                2.The Special Commissioner and
                   Commissioner of Land Administration,
                  Government of Tamil Nadu,
                  Chepauk, Chennai -5.

                3.The District Collector,
                  Thoothukudi District,
                  Thoothukudi- 8.

                4.The Revenue Divisional Officer,
                  Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi District.

                5.The Tahsildar,
                  Ottapidaram Taluk,
                  Thoothukudi District.




                ____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                Page 1 of 7
                                                                             W.P.(MD) No.9055 of 2008


                6.The Block Development Officer,
                  Ottapidaram Taluk,
                  Thoothukudi District.

                7.The Executive Engineer (WRD),
                  Public Works Department,
                  Korampallam River Basin Region,
                  Sivankoil Street,
                  Thoothukudi – 2.

                8.Ind Bharat Power Gen Company Ltd.,
                  Represented by its Managing Director,
                  Project Site – Keezhavelayuthapuram Village,
                  Pudurpandiyapuram Panchayat,
                  Melarasadi Post, Thoothukudi- 2.

                9.Deepak Maini,
                  Interim Resolution Professional,
                  Ind Bharat Power Gen Company Ltd.,
                  Residing at:C/100, Sec-2, Noida,
                  Uttarpradesh – 201 301.                        ... Respondents
                  (R9 is impleaded vide Court order
                   dated 20.02.2024 in W.M.P.(MD)No.3237 of 2024
                   in W.P.(MD)No.9055 of 2009 by DKKJ & RVJ)

                PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to
                issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent nos. 1 to 7 to remove
                the encroachments made by the respondent no.8 in the Odai Poramboke in
                'Mootha Odai' and cart track to an extent of 0.81.0 hectares, in Survey No.
                32/7, 34/3 and 38/1, Pudur Pandiapuram Village, Ottapidaram Taluk,
                Thoothukudi District to an extent of 0.22.0 Ares.


                                  For Petitioner           : Mr.M.P.Senthil
                                  For Respondents 1 to 7   : Mr.S.P.Maharajan
                                                             Special Government Pleader
                                  For 8th Respondent       : No Appearance




                ____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                Page 2 of 7
                                                                               W.P.(MD) No.9055 of 2008




                                                        ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.]

The prayer in the Writ Petition reads follows:-

“To issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to

7 to remove the encroachments made by the 8th respondent in the

Odai Poramboke in 'Mootha Odai' and cart track to an extent of

0.81.0 hectares, in Survey Nos.32/7, 34/3 and 38/1, Pudur

Pandiapuram Village, Ottapidaram Taluk, Thoothukudi District to

an extent of 0.22.0 Ares”

2.The fact that the company namely, the 8th respondent in the Writ

Petition, has encroached upon 0.93.5 hectares of Government land is not in

dispute. The fact that the said company is in the process of liquidation is

also not in dispute and the proceedings are pending before National

Company Law Tribunal, Hyderabad and an Interim Resolution Professional

has also been appointed. In a similar Writ Petition filed by another person,

the Division Bench of this Court had passed an order, directing the removal

of encroachments and the copy of the order has also been marked to the

Presiding Officer of the National Company Law Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench

and Mr.Deepak Maini, the Interim Resolution Profession appointed by

____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

National Company Law Tribunal. There has been no response whatsoever.

The Tahsildar, Ottanpidaram, in his instructions to the learned Government

Pleader has said that since the NCLT has passed an order prohibiting

institution of a suit or continuation of a pending suit or proceedings against

the Corporate debtor including execution of any judgment and decree or

order in any Court of law, Tribunal, Arbitration panel or other authority.

There is also a prohibition from Transferring, encumbering, alienating or

disposing of by the Corporate debtor any of its assert or any legal right

or beneficial interest therein any action to foreclose, recover or enforce

any security interest created by the Corporate debtor in respect of

which property including any action taken under the securitization and

reconstruction of financial assets and Enforcement of Security Interest

Act, 2002, the recovery of any property by the owner or lessor, where

such property is occupied by or in possession of the Corporate debtor.

The Tahsildar sees this order as a prohibition against initiation of

proceedings under the Land Encroachment Act, 1905.

3.We are unable to sustain the contention of the fifth respondent

namely, Tahsildar, Ottapidaram. The prohibitory order issued by NCLT

would apply only if the company that is being wounded up is in legal

possession of the property. An illegal possession of the property by way of

encroachment cannot be or shall not be protected by NCLT or any Court for

____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

that matter in proceedings for liquidation of the encroacher. Therefore, there

will be a direction to the respondents to initiate appropriate proceedings

under the Land Encroachment Act, 1905, against the company represented

by the Interim Resolution Professional, Mr.Deepak Maini, C/100, Sector -2,

Noida, Uttarpradesh – 201 301, Email.id:[email protected]. The

needful to be done within the period of four weeks from the date of receipt of

copy of this order and the compliance to be reported this Court by

17.09.2024. Post on 17.09.2024 'for reporting compliance'.

4.Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

                                                              [R.S.M., J.]             [L.V.G., J.]
                                                                       08.08.2024
                NCC      : No
                Index : No
                Internet : Yes
                Mrn/Sml




                ____________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

To

1.The Secretary, State of Tamil Nadu, Department of Revenue, (Land Development), Fort. St. George, Chennai - 9.

2.The Special Commissioner and Commissioner of Land Administration, Government of Tamil Nadu, Chepauk, Chennai -5.

3.The District Collector, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi- 8.

4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi District.

5.The Tahsildar, Ottapidaram Taluk, Thoothukudi District.

6.The Block Development Officer, Ottapidaram Taluk, Thoothukudi District.

7.The Executive Engineer (WRD), Public Works Department, Korampallam River Basin Region, Sivankoil Street, Thoothukudi – 2.

____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.

and L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.

Mrn/Sml

08.08.2024

____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter