Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 15128 Mad
Judgement Date : 5 August, 2024
C.M.P.(MD) No.2099 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 05.08.2024
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN
C.M.P.(MD) No.2099 of 2023
in
C.M.A. (MD) SR. No.34655 of 2016
The Manager,
M/s.Reliance General Insurance
Company Limited,
PLA Kanagu Towers, 3rd Floor,
Thillai Nagar 11th Cross Street,
Trichy. ... Petitioner / Appellant
Vs.
1.P.Prabakaran
S/o.Pitchiaya
2.G.Kalayani
W/o.Gopaldass
3.Kavitha
W/o.Krishnamoorthy ... Respondents/Respondents
Prayer in C.M.P.(MD) No.2099 of 2023: Civil Miscellaneous Petition
filed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 praying to
condone the delay of 196 days in filing the appeal as against the fair and
executable order passed in M.C.O.P.No.359 of 2009 on the file of the
Motor Accident Claims Tribunal [Special Subordinate Court], Tanjore,
dated 26.10.2015.
_____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Page No. 1 of 4
C.M.P.(MD) No.2099 of 2023
Prayer in C.M.A.(MD) SR.No.34655 of 2016:- Civil Miscellaneous
Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 praying
to set aside the Judgment and Decree passed by the Motor Accident
Claims Tribunal [Special Subordinate Court], Tanjore, dated 26.10.2015
in M.C.O.P.No.359 of 2009.
For Petitioner/Appellant : Mr.V.Sakthivel
For Respondents/Respondents : No appearance
ORDER
This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to condone the
delay of 196 days in filing the Appeal against the Judgment and Decree
dated 26.10.2015 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal [Special
Subordinate Court], Tanjore, in M.C.O.P.No.359 of 2009, awarding a
compensation of Rs.47,700/- to the first respondent herein.
2. In spite of several opportunities, the petitioner/appellant has not
taken any steps to implead the legal heirs of the deceased second
respondent, who was the owner of the vehicle. The petitioner/appellant
has mainly challenged the finding on liability. Hence, the second
respondent is a necessary party. Further, the petitioner/appellant Insurance
_____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Company has not made out any ground for challenging the meagre
compensation of Rs.47,700/-.
3. Since no steps were taken by the petitioner/appellant to implead
the legal heirs of the deceased second respondent, this Civil
Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed. Consequently, the Civil
Miscellaneous Appeal stands rejected at the S.R. stage itself. No costs.
05.08.2024 Index: Yes/ No Neutral Citation: Yes / No Speaking Order / Non-Speaking Order
JEN
Copy To:
The Special Subordinate Judge, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Tanjore.
_____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
SUNDER MOHAN, J.
JEN
in C.M.A. (MD) SR. No.34655 of 2016
05.08.2024
_____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!