Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Collector Of Thiurvallur vs S.Susila ...First
2024 Latest Caselaw 15106 Mad

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 15106 Mad
Judgement Date : 5 August, 2024

Madras High Court

The Collector Of Thiurvallur vs S.Susila ...First on 5 August, 2024

Author: D.Krishnakumar

Bench: D. Krishnakumar

                                                                     WA Nos.2358 and 2359 of 2024

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                 DATED: 05.08.2024

                                                      CORAM:

                        THE HON'BLE MR.D. KRISHNAKUMAR, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
                                                          AND

                                    THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI

                                          WA Nos.2358 and 2359 of 2024

                     1.The Collector of Thiurvallur
                       Thiruvallur.

                     2.The Tahsildar of Thiruvottiyur
                       Thiruvottiyur, Chennai -600 019.

                     3.The Government of Tamil Nadu
                       Represented by Additional Secretary,
                       Public Department, Secretariat, George Fort,
                       Chennai.                                     Appellants in
                                                                    WA No.2358 of 2024

                     1.The State of Tamil Nadu
                     Represented by its Secretary,
                     Public (Political Pension.I) Department,
                     Fort St.George,
                     Chennai -600 009                           ... Appellant in
                                                                  WA No.2359 of 2024




                     1/9


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                    WA Nos.2358 and 2359 of 2024

                           versus
                     1.S.Susila                              ...First respondent
                                                              in WA No.2358 of 2024

                     Mr.C.Thompson                         ...Deceased respondent
                                                              in WA No.2359 of 2024

                     2.Union of India
                       Represented by its Special Secretary to Government,
                       Ministry of Home Affairs,
                       Freedom Fighters Divisions,
                       First Floor Lok Nayak Bhavan,
                       New Delhi                 `            ...Second respondent in
                                                               WA Nos.2358 of 2024 and
                                                                First respondent
                                                                in WA No 2359 of 2024
                     3. T.Glory Vasanthakumari
                     4.T.Mercy Sarojabhai
                     5.T.Glory Epsybai
                     6.T.Bhaktha Valsalaraj
                     7.T.Baktha Manohara Dhas               respondents 2 to 6 in
                                                             WA No,2359 of 2024

                     respondents 2 to 6 substituted in
                     CMP No.16723 of 2024
                     in WA No.2359 of 2024
                     by ACJ and PBBJ

                     PRAYER: Writ Appeals filed against the order of the learned Single Judge
                     in WP Nos. 34069 of 2019 and 26613 of 2019 dated 22.04.2022.
                           For the Appellants      :Mr.S.Kumaresan
                                                   Additional Advocate General
                                                   Assisted by Mr.Harish,
                                                   Government Advocate (in both)


                     2/9


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                            WA Nos.2358 and 2359 of 2024

                              For the Respondents         :Mr.V.NandhaGopal
                                                            for private respondents (both)


                                                   COMMON JUDGMENT

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J.)

These Writ Appeals are filed against the common order of the learned

Single Judge in WP Nos. 34069 of 2019 and 26613 of 2019, dated

22.04.2022.

2. By consent of parties, these Writ Appeals are taken up for final

disposal.

3. The first respondent in WA No.2358 of 2024 has filed the writ

petition challenging the proceedings of the second respondent dated

07.05.2019 and quash the same and to direct the appellants to issue

Freedom Fighters Pension under Swatantrata Sainik Samman Pension

Scheme 1980 from the date of application of the first respondent dated

03.11.2001.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WA Nos.2358 and 2359 of 2024

4. The deceased respondent in WA No.2359 of 2024 has filed the writ

petition seeking for a direction to the appellants to dispose of the

representation made on 21.06.2005, 10.01.2011, 15.03.2016 and

18.03.2019.

5. Learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the appellant

department submitted that pending the writ petitions, pursuant to the interim

direction of the writ court dated 23.09.2020, the State Level Screening

Committee, by orders dated 16.04.2022 and 17.12.2020 respectively has

recommended for grant of both State and Central pensions and hence, the

prayer as sought for in the writ petitions have become infrcutuous.

However, since the writ petitioners have not received the said pension, the

writ court has directed the appellant Department to grant the pensionary

benefits with effect from the date of application within a period of two weeks

from the date of receipt of a copy of that order.

6. Learned Additional Advocate General further submitted that the

Government is final authority for passing such order, based on the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WA Nos.2358 and 2359 of 2024

recommendation made by the State Level Screening Committee. He further

submits that the Government also undertakes to pass positive order in favour

of the writ petitioners by granting the pensionary benefits, based on the said

recommendation.

7. He further submitted that as directed by this writ court, the writ

petitioners are entitled for the grant of such pensionary benefit with effect

from the date of applications, will be considered by the Government and

appropriate orders will be passed. To that extent, he seeks liberty may be

granted to the authority concerned to consider and pass appropriate orders.

8. Learned counsel for the respondents may not have serious objection

for considering the applications dated 03.11.2001 and 21.06.2005 of the

writ petitioners, in the light of the recommendation made by the State Level

Screening Committee.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WA Nos.2358 and 2359 of 2024

9. In the light of the above, we are inclined to pass order as follows:

i) The order of the writ court is insofar as the direction granted in the

writ petitions are set aside.

ii) The third appellant in WA No.2358 of 2004 is directed to consider

whether the writ petitioners are eligible for grant of pensionary benefits from

the date of their applications dated 03.11.2001 and 21.06.2005, based on

the report submitted by the State Level Screening Committee, and pass

orders, as orders as expeditiously as possible, within a period of two weeks

from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

iii) We make it clear while passing the final order, the authority

concerned shall also take into consideration whether there was any delay on

the part of the department, in considering the grant of pension from the date

of applications.

iv) If being aggrieved by final order passed by Government, towards

the grant of said pensionary benefit from the date of application, liberty is

granted to the writ petitioners to challenge the same.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WA Nos.2358 and 2359 of 2024

10. With the above directions, the writ appeals stand disposed of.

There shall be no order as to costs.

                                                                         (D.K.K., ACJ.)       (P.B.B.,
                     J.)
                                                                                 05.08.2024

                     Index        : Yes/No
                     Neutral Citation : Yes/No
                     mrn

                     To
                     The Special Secretary to Government,
                     Ministry of Home Affairs,
                     Freedom Fighters Divisions,
                     First Floor Lok Nayak Bhavan,
                     New Delhi







https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                WA Nos.2358 and 2359 of 2024


                                  THE HON'BLE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
                                                                and
                                                      P.B. BALAJI, J.

                                                                     (mrn)




                                            WA Nos.2358 and 2359 of 2024




                                                                05.08.2024




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                  WA Nos.2358 and 2359 of 2024







https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter