Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

G.Sugumaran vs The Managing Director
2024 Latest Caselaw 14883 Mad

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 14883 Mad
Judgement Date : 1 August, 2024

Madras High Court

G.Sugumaran vs The Managing Director on 1 August, 2024

                                                                     WP(MD) No.18113 of 2024

                            BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                DATED: 01.08.2024

                                                    CORAM:

                                  THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA

                                          W.P.(MD) No.18113 of 2024
                                                    and
                                          W.M.P(MD)No.15462 of 2024


                      G.Sugumaran                                          ... Petitioner


                                                       Vs.

                      1.The Managing Director
                         The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd.,
                         TNSTC Head Office,
                          No.27, Railway Station New Road,
                          Kumbakonam – 612 001.


                      2.The General Manager
                         The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd.,
                         Nagapattinam Retion,
                         Vellipalayam,
                         Nagpattinam.                                      ... Respondents




                      1/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                             WP(MD) No.18113 of 2024

                      Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of

                      India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus

                      call for records relating to the impugned order passed by the 2nd

                      respondent in TNSTC/Kum/Legal/L2/3030/2023 dated 11.05.2023 and

                      quash the same as illegal and further directing the 1st respondent to

                      provide duty to the petitioner forthwith.



                                   For Petitioner       : Mr.S.P.Vijay Nivas

                                   For Respondent       : Mr.K.Jagadees Balan

                                                          Standing Counsel

                                                        ORDER

Heard Mr.SP.Vijay Nivas, learned counsel appearing for the

petitioner and Mr.K.Jagadees Balan, learned Standing Counsel

appearing for the respondents.

2. By consent of both parties, this writ petition is taken up

for final disposal at the stage of admission itself.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

3.The petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging the

order, dated 11.05.2023 and to direct the first respondent to reinstate

him into service.

4. The petitioner has involved in a criminal case for having

caused an accident and in this regard, a case has been registered and

pending against him in C.C.No.426 of 2012, on the file of the Judicial

Magistrate No.I, Mannargudi. In fact, at the conclusion of the

proceedings, the petitioner was convicted for two years imprisonment

along with Rs.10,000/- fine vide judgment, dated 28.10.2022. However,

the petitioner claims that the order of punishment has been kept under

suspension and the petitioner has been released on bail on the condition

that he has to sign before the jurisdictional Police Station on the first

week of every month. So the petitioner claims that he need not be kept

out of service and he can be reinstated.

5. It is the respondents who had to get convinced in

reinstating the petitioner even when the appeal filed by the petitioner is

pending. Since the petitioner has already caused an accident, for which,

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

he has also got convicted, it is difficult for the petitioner to expect the

respondent to consider his claim for reinstatement before the disposal of

the Criminal Appeal filed by him.

6. However, the petitioner is at liberty to submit a fresh

representation by stating the grounds of his appeal and on receipt of the

same, the respondents shall consider and pass orders on merits. It is also

needless to state that the petitioner should endeavour to get the appeal

disposed at the earliest.

7. With the above observation, this writ petition is disposed

of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is

closed.




                                                                      01.08.2024
                      Index : Yes / No
                      Internet : Yes / No
                      NCC      : Yes / No
                      RM





https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

To

1.The Managing Director The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd., TNSTC Head Office, No.27, Railway Station New Road, Kumbakonam – 612 001.

2.The General Manager The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd., Nagapattinam Retion, Vellipalayam, Nagpattinam.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

R.N.MANJULA, J.

RM

Order made in

01.08.2024

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter