Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rethinam vs State Of Tamilnadu
2024 Latest Caselaw 14809 Mad

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 14809 Mad
Judgement Date : 1 August, 2024

Madras High Court

Rethinam vs State Of Tamilnadu on 1 August, 2024

Author: M.S.Ramesh

Bench: M.S. Ramesh

                                                                              HCP.No.1761 of 2024

                                   fIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                  DATED : 01.08.2024

                                                       CORAM :

                                   THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH
                                                   AND
                                  THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN

                                               H.C.P.No.1761 of 2024

                     Rethinam                                                ... Petitioner

                                                         Vs.

                     1.State of Tamilnadu,
                     Rep. by the Additional Chief Secretary to Government,
                     Home, Prohibition and Excise Department,
                     Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009.

                     2.District Collector and District Magistrate,
                     Ariyalur District,
                     Ariyalur.

                     3.The Superintendent of Police,
                     Ariyalur District,
                     Ariyalur.

                     4.The Superintendent of Prison,
                     Central Prison,
                     Tiruchirappalli.

                     5.The Inspector of Police,
                     Keelapalur Police Station,
                     Ariyalur District.                                  ... Respondents


                     Page 1 of 8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                   HCP.No.1761 of 2024

                     PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to
                     issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, calling for the records relating to the
                     detention order in Cr.M.P.No.06/2024, dated 29.02.2024 passed by the
                     2nd respondent under the Tamilnadu Act 14 of 1982 and set aside the
                     same and direct the respondents to produce the petitioner's son
                     Marimuthu @ Mass @ Masanam S/o.Irulandi aged about 21 years the
                     detenue, now confined in Central Prison, Tiruchirapalli before this
                     Hon'ble Court and set him at liberty.


                                        For Petitioner          : Mr.P.Praveen Kumar

                                        For Respondents         : Mr.A.Gokulakrishnan,
                                                                  Additional Public Prosecutor

                                                           ORDER

M.S.RAMESH, J.

AND SUNDER MOHAN, J.

The petitioner herein, who is the uncle of the detenu Marimuthu @

Mass @ Masanam, aged about 21 years, S/o.Irulandi, has come forward

with this petition challenging the detention order passed by the second

respondent dated 29.02.2024 slapped on the detenu, branding him as

"Goonda" under the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Bootleggers, Cyber Law Offenders, Drug Offenders, Forest Offenders,

Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders, Sand Offenders, Sexual Offenders,

Slum Grabbers and Video Pirates Act, 1982 [Tamil Nadu Act 14 of

1982].

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as the

learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents.

3. Though several grounds are raised in the petition, the learned

counsel for the petitioner submitted that there is an inordinate delay in

passing the order of detention.

4. In the instant case, the detenu was arrested on 25.01.2024 and

thereafter, the detention order came to be passed on 29.02.2024. This

fact is not disputed by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor.

5. In the case of 'Sushanta Kumar Banik Vs. State of Tripura',

reported in '2022 LiveLaw (SC) 1761', when there was an inordinate

delay from the date of proposal till passing of the detention order and

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

likewise, between the date of detention order and the actual arrest, the

Hon'ble Supreme Court had held that the live and proximate link,

between the grounds and the purpose of detention, stands snapped in

arresting the detenu. The relevant observation of the Hon'ble Supreme

Court is extracted hereunder:-

“20. It is manifestly clear from a conspectus of the above decisions of this Court, that the underlying principle is that if there is unreasonable delay between the date of the order of detention & actual arrest of the detenu and in the same manner from the date of the proposal and passing of the order of detention, such delay unless satisfactorily explained throws a considerable doubt on the genuineness of the requisite subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority in passing the detention order and consequently render the detention order bad and invalid because the “live and proximate link” between the grounds of detention and the purpose of detention is snapped in arresting the detenu. A question whether the delay is unreasonable and stands unexplained depends on the facts and circumstances of each case.”

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

6. Drawing inspiration from the judgment in Sushanta Kumar

Banik's case, a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of 'Gomathi

Vs. Principal Secretary to Government and Others', reported in '2023

SCC OnLine Mad 6332', had held that when there is an inordinate delay

from the date of arrest/date of proposal till the order of detention, the live

and proximate link between them would also stand snapped and thereby,

had quashed the detention order on this ground.

7.In yet another case i.e., in 'Nagaraj Vs. State of Tamil Nadu',

reported in '(2018) 3 MWN (Cri) 428', this Court had held that the

delay of 36 days in passing the detention order after the arrest of the

detenu would snap the live and proximate link between the grounds and

purpose of detention. Hence, in view of the unexplained and inordinate

delay in passing the order of detention, after the arrest of the detenu, the

detention order in the present case, is liable to be quashed.

8. Accordingly, the detention order passed by the second

respondent on 29.02.2024 in Cr.M.P.No:06/2024, is hereby set aside and

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

the Habeas Corpus Petition is allowed. The detenu Marimuthu @ Mass

@ Masanam, aged about 21 years, S/o.Irulandi, is directed to be set at

liberty forthwith, unless his confinement is required in connection with

any other case.

                                                            [M.S.R., J]       [S.M., J]
                                                                      01.08.2024
                     Index: Yes/No
                     Internet:Yes/No
                     Neutral Citation: Yes/No
                     Tsg

Note:-Registry shall forthwith return the booklet containing the materials, on which, the Detaining Authority has placed reliance, to the petitioner/counsel for the petitioner with due acknowledgment.

To

1.State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by the Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009.

2.District Collector and District Magistrate, Ariyalur District, Ariyalur.

3.The Superintendent of Police, Ariyalur District, Ariyalur.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

4.The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison, Tiruchirappalli.

5.The Inspector of Police, Keelapalur Police Station, Ariyalur District.

6.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

M.S.RAMESH, J.

and

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

SUNDER MOHAN, J.

Tsg

01.08.2024

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter