Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

R.Jawahar vs R.Rajaramanan
2024 Latest Caselaw 7360 Mad

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 7360 Mad
Judgement Date : 1 April, 2024

Madras High Court

R.Jawahar vs R.Rajaramanan on 1 April, 2024

Author: J.Sathya Narayana Prasad

Bench: Sanjay V.Gangapurwala, J.Sathya Narayana Prasad

                                                                           W.A.No.1966 of 2023


                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED:   01.04.2024

                                                       CORAM

                             THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICE
                                                         AND
                                  THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD

                                                W.A.No.1966 of 2023

                     R.Jawahar                                        ..    Appellant

                                                         Vs.

                     1. R.Rajaramanan

                     2. The Sub Collector
                        Office of the Sub Collector.

                     3. The Sub Registrar
                        O/o. The Sub Registrar
                        Registration Department
                        Panruti Town
                        Cuddalore District 607 106.                   ..    Respondents


                     Prayer: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the

                     order dated 25.04.2023 in Review Petition No.10 of 2023 reviewing

                     the order dated 28.09.2022 made in W.P.No.2371 of 2020 enhancing

                     the quantum of maintenance from Rs.15,000/- to Rs.25,000/-.


                     __________
                     Page 1 of 6


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                W.A.No.1966 of 2023




                                      For the Appellant         : Mr.P.Dinesh Kumar

                                      For the Respondents       : Mr.M.R.Thangavel
                                                                  For Mr.K.Sundareswaran
                                                                  for Respondent-1

                                                                  Mr.C.Kathiravan
                                                                  Special Government Pleader
                                                                  for Respondents 2 & 3


                                                         JUDGMENT

(Delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)

We have heard Mr.P.Dinesh Kumar, learned counsel for the

appellant, Mr.M.R.Thangavel, learned counsel for

Mr.K.Sundareswaran, learned counsel for the first respondent and

Mr.C.Kathiravan, learned Special Government Pleader for the

respondents 2 and 3.

2. The writ petition was filed by the first respondent herein for

cancellation of the Settlement deed. The request of the original writ

petitioner to cancel the settlement deed was rejected by the

authority. He filed writ petition before the learned Single Judge. The

__________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

learned Single Judge directed payment of maintenance initially at

the rate of Rs.15,000/- to each parent. Subsequently, the same was

modified to Rs.25,000/- and 15,000/-, totally Rs.40,000/-.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that

maintenance was never claimed in the application filed before the

authority. Even otherwise, the statutory limitation is Rs.10,000/-.

The Court could not have granted beyond Rs.10,000/- per month.

4. Learned counsel for the first respondent submits that the

order passed by the learned Single Judge is a discretionary and

equitable order. The father has handed over the entire business to

the appellant herein and has no source of income left.

5. We had referred the matter for mediation. However,

mediation could also not succeed.

6. During the course of argument, we asked learned counsel

__________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

for the appellant as to whether the appellant would be ready to pay

maintenance at Rs.10,000/- to each parent. Learned counsel, in the

morning session, sought time to take instructions. The matter was

kept in the afternoon session. In the afternoon session, learned

counsel for the appellant, on instructions, submits that the

appellant would pay an amount of Rs.10,000/- towards

maintenance to each parent, totally Rs.20,000/-.

7. It is the contention of the appellant that a civil suit is

pending qua cancellation of the settlement deed. The parties may

agitate about their rights in the pending civil suit with regard to the

settlement deed.

8. As the appellant has now agreed to pay Rs.10,000/- per

month as maintenance to each of his parents and that till March, he

has already paid the amount of maintenance, as directed by the

learned Single Judge, we pass the following order:

__________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

(i) From 01.04.2024, the appellant shall pay maintenance at the rate of Rs.10,000/- per month to each parent, totally Rs.20,000/-, regularly till the issue of settlement deed is decided by the civil Court; and

(ii) The amount of maintenance, as agreed by the appellant, shall be paid on or before 5th of every month.

9. The writ appeal stands disposed of. There shall be no order

as to costs. Consequently, C.M.P.No.16714 of 2023 is closed.

                                                             (S.V.G., CJ.)                (J.S.N.P., J.)
                                                                             01.04.2024
                     Index            : Yes/No
                     Neutral Citation : Yes/No

                     kpl

                     To

                     1. The Sub Collector
                        Office of the Sub Collector.

                     2. The Sub Registrar

O/o. The Sub Registrar, Registration Department Panruti Town, Cuddalore District 607 106.

__________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.

(kpl)

01.04.2024

__________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter