Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

P.S.Karthikeyan vs M/S.Shirdi Sai Sakthi Foundation ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 12878 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 12878 Mad
Judgement Date : 21 September, 2023

Madras High Court
P.S.Karthikeyan vs M/S.Shirdi Sai Sakthi Foundation ... on 21 September, 2023
                                                                          OSA.No.345 of 2012

                                   THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
                                                DATED: 21.09.2023
                                                     CORAM:
                                  THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
                                                   AND
                                   THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE R.KALAIMATHI

                                               O.S.A.No.345 of 2012


                     P.S.Karthikeyan                                     ...Appellant

                                                        Vs.


                     1.M/s.Shirdi Sai Sakthi Foundation Trust,
                       Office at No.1/355, Kalamegham Street,
                       Mogappair West, Chennai – 600 037.

                        Regd. Office at No.59,
                        Madhya Shirdi Ner Swamiyar Gate,
                        Maraimalai Nagar, Chennai – 600 209.
                        Rep. by its Founder Managing Trustee S.Ramesh.

                     2.R.Maikandan,
                       Trustee.

                     3.M.Arumugam,
                       Trustee

                     4.The Advocate General,
                       High Court,
                       Madrast – 600 104.


                     1/6


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                   OSA.No.345 of 2012

                     5.J.Rajesh [ R5 – Deleted vide EB.Sr.105303 of 2012]

                     6.T.Ravichandran

                        [R6 impleaded as party respondent vide Court
                        order dated 10.03.2021 in CMP.No.4575 of
                        2021 in OSA.No.345 of 2012]

                                                                                  ...Respondents

                     Prayer: Original Side Appeal filed under Order XXXVI Rule 1 of the
                     Original Side Rules read with Clause 15 of the Letters Patent to set aside the
                     judgment and the decree dated 01.09.2008 passed in C.S.No.628 of 2007.


                                         For Appellant       : Mr.V.R.Karthikeyan

                                         For Respondents     : Mr.Ashok Menon for R1

                                                               R2 and R3 – Given up

                                                               R4 – No appearance

                                                               R5 – Deleted
                                                                   vide EB.Sr.105303 of 2012

                                                               Mr.P.B.Sampathkumar for R6


                                                      ********




                     2/6


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                       OSA.No.345 of 2012

                                                       JUDGMENT

(Judgment of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.)

The challenge in the appeal is to the decree in a suit filed under

Section 92 of the Code of Civil Proceudre permitting sale of the property

belonging to the 1st respondent Trust.

2. The suit in C.S.No.628 of 2007 was instituted by the Trust and

two of the Trustees seeking permission for sale of the property of the Trust

on the ground that the property does not fetch any income and the Trust is

finding it difficult to continue its activities for want of finances. A

resolution passed by the Board of Trustees on the 20th of February 2007 was

also made a basis of seeking permission for sale. This Court granted

permission for sale of the property and the property was eventually sold to

one J.Rajesh S/o. Jeyasingh, a resident of East Tambaram. Though the said

Rajesh was shown as 5th respondent in the appeal, his name was struck off

from the party array which we assume must have been done prior to

12.09.2012, since a Division Bench of this Court had on 12.09.2012 while

issuing notice regarding admission in the appeal has passed the following

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis OSA.No.345 of 2012

order:

“Notice regarding admission returnable in one week. Mr.Ashok Memon, learned counsel takes notice for the first respondent. Learned counsel for the appellant, who is the third party, undertakes to implead the purchaser – Rajesh”

3. Though such an undertaking was given on 12.09.2012, no steps

have been taken till date to implead the said Rajesh, whose name was struck

off from the grounds of appeal. We find that the said Rajesh was a party in

M.P.No.2 of 2009, an application filed seeking condonation of delay in

filing the appeal. He has also been served through Court in the said

application. Despite the above, no steps have been taken to implead the said

Rajesh.

4. We are now given to understand that the said Rajesh had sold

the property in question to one T.Ravichandran who has been impleaded as

the 6th respondent by this Court vide order dated 10.03.2021 made in

C.M.P.No.4575 of 2021. The appeal, as it stands, is against the subsequent

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis OSA.No.345 of 2012

purchaser only. The purchaser of the property pursuant to the permission

from this Court is not made a party. We do not think that any purpose could

be served by keeping this appeal pending at this distant point of time, since

the necessary party has been struck off from the party array and despite the

undertaking having been given to this Court on 12.09.2012, no steps have

been taken to implead that party.

5. The appeal is therefore dismissed on the short ground of

non-impleading of the necessary party. No costs.

                                                                    (R.S.M.,J.)     (R.K.M.,J.)
                                                                             21.09.2023
                     dsa

                     Index                :No
                     Internet             :Yes
                     Neutral Citation     :No
                     Speaking order







https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                         OSA.No.345 of 2012

                                  R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.
                                               and
                                    R.KALAIMATHI, J.

                                                       dsa




                                   O.S.A.No.345 of 2012




                                             21.09.2023






https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter