Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 12620 Mad
Judgement Date : 15 September, 2023
C.R.P.(MD).No.2445 of 2018
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 15.09.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN
C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.2445 of 2018
and
C.M.P(MD) No.10891 of 2018
Arulmigu Kalahatheeswarar Devasthanam,
Dindigul Town,
Represented through its
Executive Officer. ... Petitioner/Petitioner/
2nd Defendant
-vs-
1. P.Mohan ... 1st Respondent/1st Respondent/
Plaintiff
2. The Dindigul Municipality
Represented by through its Commissioner,
now Dindigul Corporation,
through its Municipal Commissioner,
Dindigul. ... 2nd Respondent/2nd Respondent/
1st Defendant.
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the
Constitution of India, against the fair and decreetal Order dated 26.02.2018
passed in I.A.No.2158 of 2017 in O.S.No.649 of 2012 on the file of the
Principal District Munsif Court, Dindigul.
1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.R.P.(MD).No.2445 of 2018
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Muthugeethayan
For Respondents : Mr.R.J.Karthick – for R1
: Mr.J.Parekhkumar – for R2
ORDER
The instant Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the order
passed in I.A.No.2158 of 2017 in an application filed under Order VIII Rule
1A(3) of C.P.C.
2. The petitioner herein is the second defendant. The first respondent is
the plaintiff and the second respondent is the first defendant before the Court
below.
3. The short relief, the petitioner wanted is that, they want to file two
documents, namely, the certified copy of the decree and judgment in A.S.No.7
of 2016 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Dindigul. However, the leave
was rejected by the Court below. Aggrieved with the above said order, the
petitioner is before this Court.
4. I have gone through the papers. It is admitted by either side that the
suit is at the stage of marking of documents on behalf of this petitioner.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.(MD).No.2445 of 2018
However, from the perusal of the impugned order, it appears that the Court
below has gone into the merits of the matter and has not granted leave to file
the documents.
5. However, this Court is of the view that, going into the merits of the
documents even at the threshold, when the documents are sought to be
produced is not permissible. Therefore, this Court is inclined to interfere with
the order passed by the Court below.
6. In the result, this Civil Revision Petition stands allowed and the
documents sought to be filed in I.A.No.2158 of 2017 is permitted to be filed.
The Court below is directed to receive the documents subject to proof and the
relevance. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently connected
Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
15.09.2023
NCC : Yes/No
Index : Yes / No
Internet : Yes / No
ebsi
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.(MD).No.2445 of 2018
To
1. The Principal District Munsif Court, Dindigul.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.(MD).No.2445 of 2018
C.KUMARAPPAN,J.
ebsi
C.R.P(PD)(MD)No.2445 of 2018
15.09.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!