Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

S.Keerthana vs The Jawaharlal Institute Of ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 12503 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 12503 Mad
Judgement Date : 14 September, 2023

Madras High Court
S.Keerthana vs The Jawaharlal Institute Of ... on 14 September, 2023
                                                                                  WA No.2353 of 2023

                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                      DATED:    14.09.2023

                                                             CORAM

                             THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA , CHIEF JUSTICE
                                                               AND
                                        THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU

                                                   WA No.2353 of 2023
                                       and CMP Nos.19915, 19917 and 19918 of 2023

                     S.Keerthana                                                  ... Appellant

                                                               -vs-

                     1. The Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate
                         Medical Education & Research (JIPMER)
                        Rep. by its Director, Gorimedu,
                        Dhanvantari Nagar, Puducherry 605006.

                     2. The Dean (Academics),
                        Academic Section, JIPMER,
                        Gorimedu, Dhanvantari Nagar,
                        Puducherry 605 006.

                     3. The Dean,
                        College of Nursing,
                        Christian Medical College (CMC),
                        Vellore-4.                                           ... Respondents


                     Prayer: Writ appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against
                     the order dated 23.08.2023 in 24477 of 2023 on the file of this Court.


                                  For the Appellant      :       Mr.Stalin Abhimanyu

                     Page 1 of 14


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                 WA No.2353 of 2023



                                  For the Respondents     :       Mr.M.T.Arunan
                                                                  for RR 1 and 2
                                                          ;       Mr.Krishna Srinivasan
                                                                  Senior Counsel
                                                                  for M/s.S.Ramasubramaniam &
                                                                   Associates for R-3

                                                              *****

                                                          JUDGMENT

(Delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)

We have heard Mr.Stalin Abhimanyu, learned counsel for the

appellant, Mr.M.T.Arunan, learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2

and Mr.Krishna Srinivasan, learned senior counsel for respondent No.3.

2. The appellant had filed a writ petition bearing W.P.No.24477 of

2023 seeking directions against the third respondent institution to

issue Transfer Certificate, Transcript Certificate, Experience Certificate

and Course Completion Certificate to the appellant.

3. The appellant had joined the B.Sc. (Nursing) course with the

third respondent institution. At the time of admission, a bond was

executed by the appellant that she would serve with the third

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WA No.2353 of 2023

respondent for two years. The appellant had completed the course on

07.02.2021. The appellant was immediately issued with an

appointment order to serve the respondent No.3 for two years in

terms of the bond.

4. The appellant had appeared for the examination of the post

graduate course, has passed the same and was offered admission in

the first and second respondent institution. The appellant has not been

issued with the Transfer Certificate, Transcript Certificate, Experience

Certificate and Course Completion Certificate on the ground that the

appellant has not yet served for two years with the third respondent

institution.

5. The learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition on the

ground that the appellant has to mandatorily serve two years with the

third respondent institution as a condition of the bond. The said

judgment is assailed in the present appeal.

6. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the

appellant is ready to serve the respondent No.3 for two years. She

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WA No.2353 of 2023

has got admission in respondent No.1 institution for post graduate

course. After completion of the post graduate course, the appellant

would render the service to respondent No.3 for the remainder period

and the appellant in her affidavit has undertaken to that effect. The

appellant is also ready to deposit the amount of stipend which the

appellant would have received for the remaining months. The stipend

received by the appellant is Rs.25,000/- per month.

7. The learned counsel for the appellant further submits that in

fact the contingency had arisen because of the Covid-19 pandemic. If

Covid-19 pandemic would not have struck the nation, the third

respondent would be required to conduct the examination in August

2020 and the appellant would have completed the course in August

2020 and by now, would have completed the service period as per the

bond. But, because of the Covid-19 pandemic, the examination was

conducted in December 2020 - January 2021 and the appellant was

directed to serve since February 2021 in terms of the bond.

8. According to the learned counsel, the condition of bond is

harsh. There is no exit clause provided in the bond which is also

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WA No.2353 of 2023

improper. According to the learned counsel, in view of the Covid-19

pandemic and lockdown, the UGC had laid down guidelines on

examination and academic calendar for the Universities. The year was

to end on 14.08.2020. The calendar was suggested for the academic

session 2020-21 and the same was to end by 30.07.2021 and the next

academic session was to start from 02.08.2021. If that would have

been followed, then the appellant would have completed the course

within time, that is August 2020. However, the same was not adhered

to.

9. The learned counsel relies upon the judgment of the Apex

Court in the case of Rakesh Kumar Agarwalla vs. National Law

School of India University, reported in (2021) 1 SCC 539 (paras

90 to 94). In the said judgment, the UGC guidelines issued during

Covid-19 pandemic were also considered. It was observed that the

academic year 2020-21 is not a normal academic year in which

universities are expected to carry on their teaching and other activities

in normal mode and manner. It was observed that the academic year

2020-21 was required to be declared as “zero-year” even if the course

starts in mid of October 2020. According to the learned counsel, the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WA No.2353 of 2023

opportunity to the appellant to undergo the post graduate course is

once in the lifetime. The appellant has got admission to post graduate

course in the prestigious respondent Nos.1 and 2 after successfully

passing the competitive examination.

10 We have heard Mr.M.T.Arunan, learned counsel for

respondent Nos.1 and 2 and Mr.Krishna Srinivasan, learned senior

counsel for the respondent No.3.

11. The learned senior counsel for respondent No.3 submits that

the bond does not contain the exit clause. The candidate has to

necessarily and mandatorily serve for two years after the course is

completed. The fees charged by respondent No.3 is a paltry sum of

Rs.810/-. Even the Government Colleges of Nursing charge fees of

more than Rs.25,000/- to Rs.30,000/-. The respondent No.3

institution is a service-oriented institution. It is with a view that service

is required to be rendered to the poor people, the education is

imparted at a subsidised rate to the students and as such, the

condition is imposed that they shall serve for two years with the

respondent No.3 institution. No commercial approach exists on the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WA No.2353 of 2023

part of respondent No.3. The terms of the bond are clear. They have

to be adhered to.

12. The learned senior counsel relies upon the judgment of the

Apex Court in a case of Association of Medical Superspeciality

Aspirants and Residents vs. Union of India, reported in (2019) 8

SCC 607. It is submitted that the Apex Court has held that the

service bonds to serve for a particular number of years do not violate

Articles 14, 19, 21 and 23 of the Constitution. He also relies upon the

various orders passed by this Court in the cases of S.Austine Blessie

vs. Dr.MGR Medical University, reported in 2018 SCC OnLine Mad

3148 and State of Tamil Nadu vs. P.S.Sairam, reported in (2020)

7 Mad LJ 513.

13. It is further submitted by the learned senior counsel for the

third respondent that the appellant with his open eyes took admission

with the respondent No.3 institution. In the prospectus also, it is

specifically stated that all candidates admitted to the programme will

have to undertake the service obligation to work in an area of need for

a period of two years after completion of training. The candidates

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WA No.2353 of 2023

chosen under the open category will serve in areas of need identified

by the Christian Medical College, Vellore, the third respondent herein.

Now the appellant cannot turn around and contend otherwise. It is

further submitted that even if the appellant gives an undertaking that

after completion of the post graduate course, she will serve for the

remainder period, the experience of respondent No.3 is otherwise that

the candidates, after leaving, would never turn back and render the

service.

14. We have considered the submissions canvassed by the

learned counsel for the parties.

15. The factual matrix is not disputed. The only question would

be whether to allow the appellant to join the post graduate course for

which the appellant has secured admission, though five months service

as per the bond has remained to be served by the appellant.

16. The bond executed by the appellant does not contain an exit

clause. The bond requires the appellant to serve after completion of

the course for a period of two years with respondent No.3. There is

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WA No.2353 of 2023

no clause that if the appellant jumped the bond, she will have to pay

any amount to respondent No.3 institution.

17. It also appears that respondent No.3 is charging a very

meagre amount as tuition fee, that is, Rs.810/- annually. The same

would be less than the fees charged by the Government Colleges of

Nursing. The amount of fee charged from the students is meagre and

the default clause is not incorporated in the bond, that would make the

candidates serve mandatorily with respondent No.3 institution.

18. It has been observed in the case of Association of Medical

Superspeciality Aspirants and Resident (supra) by the Apex Court

that the service bonds to serve for a particular number of years and in

default to compensate the Government by paying some lakhs of

rupees do not violate Articles 14, 19, 21 and 23 of the Constitution,

rather the State Government in imposing such service conditions

fulfilled the constitutional obligation under Articles 21 and 47 of the

Constitution. In the present case, there is no default clause and/or

exit clause. The service bond which mandatorily requires the

candidate to serve for a period of two years without an exit clause

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WA No.2353 of 2023

could be violative of Articles 14, 19, 21 and 23 was not the subject

matter of consideration before the Apex Court in the said case.

19. In the present case, we would certainly not have accepted

the case of the appellant, however, considering the exigency, that is,

the course being extended because of the Covid-19 pandemic and the

appellant having secured admission to the post graduate course and

only 4½ to 5 months of service period having remained to be served,

we have considered the present case. It is not that the appellant did

not volunteer to serve with the respondent No.3 institution after

completion of the course. She is serving with the institution since

07.02.2021. She has served for more than one year and 7 months.

4½ to 5 months of service bond period remains. If the course would

have been completed within the time line, the appellant would have

completed the course in August 2020 and by this time, would have

been freed of the bond.

20. We also are alive to the noble cause the respondent No.3 is

rendering service to the poor people. The appellant has to render the

service for the remainder period with respondent No.3. However, a

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WA No.2353 of 2023

balance will have to be struck in view of the peculiar facts and

circumstances of the present case.

21. As we have observed supra. we would not have entertained

the petition if it would have been under the normal facts of the case,

however, considering the following factors, we have entertained the

petition:

(1) Because of the Covid-19 pandemic, the term was extended.

But for Covid-19 pandemic, the appellant would have

completed the course in August 2020 and by this time, i.e.,

August 2023, would have completed the bond period.

However, because of the Covid-19 pandemic, the examination

was delayed by six months and it is only in February, 2021,

the course could be completed and the appellant was issued

with the appointment order to serve with respondent No.3 for

a period of two years;

(2) The appellant has already served for one year and 7 months

with respondent No.3 and hardly, 4½ to 5 months of service

has remained;

(3) The appellant is selected for post graduate course after a

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WA No.2353 of 2023

competitive selection process;

(4) The appellant has undertaken to pay the stipend for the

remaining period as a deposit and further has undertaken to

serve with the respondent No.3 institution for the remainder

period after completion of the post graduate course.

21. In light of the above, we pass the following order:

Respondent No.3 shall issue the Transfer Certificate, Transcript

Certificate, Experience Certificate and Course Completion Certificate to

the appellant immediately after the appellant deposits a sum of

Rs.1,50,000/- (Rupees one lakh fifty thousand only) with respondent

No.3. The said amount shall be a deposit. The appellant shall, after

completing the post-graduate course, render service for the remainder

period with respondent No.3. The respondent Nos.1 and 2 shall not

hand over the Course Completion Certificate to the appellant unless

the appellant renders the remainder service with respondent No.3. It

is only after the certificate is issued by respondent No.3 of the

appellant having rendered service for the total period of two years, the

respondent Nos.1 and 2 shall hand over the Course Completion

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WA No.2353 of 2023

Certificate and the Post-graduate passing certificate to the appellant.

After the appellant renders the service of the remainder period, the

respondent No.3 shall refund the amount of Rs.1,50,000/- (Rupees

one lakh fifty thousand only) to the appellant.

With the aforesaid directions and observations, the writ appeal is

disposed of. There will be no order as to costs. Consequently,

connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

                                                            (S.V.G., CJ.)                (P.D.A., J.)
                                                                            14.09.2023
                     Index                    : Yes/No
                     Neutral Citation         : Yes/No
                     sra


                     To

                     1. The Director,
                        Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate
                         Medical Education & Research (JIPMER)

Gorimedu, Dhanvantari Nagar, Puducherry 605006.

2. The Dean (Academics), Academic Section, JIPMER, Gorimedu, Dhanvantari Nagar, Puducherry 605 006.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WA No.2353 of 2023

THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND P.D.AUDIKESAVALU, J.

(sra)

3. The Dean, College of Nursing, Christian Medical College (CMC), Vellore-4.

WA No.2353 of 2023

14.09.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter