Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

V.N.Meiygnanamoorthi ... vs Senthilvel
2023 Latest Caselaw 12308 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 12308 Mad
Judgement Date : 12 September, 2023

Madras High Court
V.N.Meiygnanamoorthi ... vs Senthilvel on 12 September, 2023
                                                                                Crl.R.C.No.1268 of 2019

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                  DATED : 12.09.2023

                                                        CORAM:

                    The Honourable MR.JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP

                                                 Crl.R.C.No.1268 of 2019


                   V.N.Meiygnanamoorthi                      ...Revision Petitioner/Accused



                                                          -Vs-


                   Senthilvel                                ...Respondent/Complainant


                   Prayer:- Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 read with 401 of
                   Cr.P.C, to call for records of the case in C.A.No.27 of 2015 on the file of
                   the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Namakkal, dated 17.03.2016
                   confirming the judgment passed in C.C.No.205 of 2012 on the file of the
                   learned Judicial Magistrate, Rasipuram, dated 19.06.2015 and set aside the
                   conviction of the Petitioner and direct that the Petitioner be set at liberty.


                                     For Petitioner    : Mr.W.M.Abdul Majeed
                                     For Respondent    : Mr.J.Prithivi
                                                         for Mr.S.Kaithamalai Kumaran




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                   1/6
                                                                                  Crl.R.C.No.1268 of 2019

                                                        ORDER

This Criminal Revision Case is filed to set aside the judgment

passed in C.A.No.27 of 2015 on the file of the learned Principal Sessions

Judge, Namakkal, dated 17.03.2016, confirming the judgment passed in

C.C.No.205 of 2012 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate,

Rasipuram, dated 19.06.2015.

2. This Court, by order dated 25.08.2023, had passed the following

order:-

“When the case came up for hearing on earlier occasion, the learned Counsel for the Revision Petitioner sought time to settle the dispute amicably. The learned Counsel for the Revision Petitioner sought to refer the matter to the Mediation Centre. The request of the learned Counsel for the Revision Petitioner was rejected by this Court, granting time to settle the amount, if the intention of the Revision Petitioner is bona fide. Accordingly, the case was adjourned from 05.07.2023 to 12.07.2023, and again from 12.07.2023 to 17.07.2023. Subsequently, adjourned to 28.07.2023. On 28.07.2023, the case did not reach for the hearing in the list. Therefore, it was automatically adjourned to 24.08.2023.

2. On 24.08.2023, the learned Counsel for the Revision Petitioner was ready with Demand Draft for Rs.15 lakhs, stating that at the time of filing this Criminal Revision Case on suspension of sentence and granting bail, this Court had insisted for deposit of part of the amount before the Trial Court.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.R.C.No.1268 of 2019

Therefore, Rs.3 lakhs was deposited before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Rasipuram. Therefore, balance of Rs.15 lakhs is taken as Demand Draft and is ready to be handed over to the learned Counsel for the Respondent/Complainant. Learned Counsel for the Respondent submitted that she has to take instructions from the Respondent/Complainant. On such request, the case was adjourned to 25.08.2023.

3. Today, 25.08.2023, when the case came up for hearing, the learned Counsel for the Respondent/Complainant submitted that the Respondent/Complainant is not willing to accept the amount.

4. On perusal of the judgment of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Rasipuram, in C.C.No.205 of 2012, dated 19.06.2015, it is found that the learned Judicial Magistrate, Rasipuram, had sentenced the Accused to one year of simple imprisonment and imposed fine of Rs.5,000/-. When the Accused had preferred the Appeal in Crl.A.No.27 of 2015 before the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Namakkal. The Criminal Appeal was dismissed as per the judgment dated 17.03.2016, confirming the judgment of conviction, sentence of imprisonment, and fine imposed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Rasipuram, in C.C.No.205 of 2012, dated 19.06.2015.

5. When the Revision Petitioner is ready to pay the amount with the Demand Draft of Rs.15 lakhs, the learned Counsel for the Respondent/Complainant insisted that the terms are not likely for settlement. The Respondent is not ready for settlement.

6. In the light of these developments, this Court directs the Revision Petitioner/Accused to cancel the Demand Draft taken in the name of the Respondent/Complainant and take a fresh Demand https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.R.C.No.1268 of 2019

Draft in the name of the designation of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Rasipuram, and deposit the amount of Rs.15 lakhs before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Rasipuram, in C.C.No.205 of 2012 dated 19.06.2015.

7. The learned Judicial Magistrate, Rasipuram, is directed to report compliance to this Court regarding the amount paid/deposited by the Accused on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Rasipuram, in C.C.No.205 of 2012 dated 19.06.2015, by way of e-mail on or before 11.09.2023.

8. Post the matter on 12.09.2023.”

3. Today 12.09.2023 in continuation of the order passed by this

Court on 25.08.2023, this Court had directed the Revision Petitioner who

was the Accused before the Trial Court to deposit the amount that he had

taken as Demand Draft for Rs.15 lakhs. The Revision Petitioner as

Accused was directed to deposit the amount before the learned Judicial

Magistrate, Rasipuram.

4. Accordingly, the Revision Petitioner/Accused had cancelled the

Demand Draft that he had already obtained in favour of the Respondent

and had filed a fresh Demand Draft and deposited the amount before the

learned Judicial Magistrate, Rasipuram, for Rs.15 lakhs.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.R.C.No.1268 of 2019

5. The remarks offered by the learned Judicial Magistrate,

Rasipuram, in letter in D.No.1792 of 2023, dated 08.09.2023, had stated

that the Accused had deposited Rs.15 lakhs by way of Demand Draft

(D.D.No.842157 dated 07.09.2023) on the file of the learned Judicial

Magistrate, Rasipuram, dated 08.08.2023.

6. In the light of the above above developments, the Criminal

Revision Case stands disposed of as settled. The Respondent may

approach the Court of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Rasipuram, and file

appropriate Petition. The sentence of imprisonment is set aside.

12.09.2023 cda Index : Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order

To

1.The Principal Sessions Judge, Namakkal.

2.The Judicial Magistrate, Rasipuram.

3.The Section Officer, VR Records, High Court, Chennai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.R.C.No.1268 of 2019

SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J.,

cda

Crl.R.C.No.1268 of 2019

12.09.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter