Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 12240 Mad
Judgement Date : 11 September, 2023
W.A.No.2454 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 11.09.2023
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU
W.A.No.2454 of 2023
S.Soundaram .. Appellant
Vs
1. S.Malar
2. The Tahsildar
Pethanaickenpalayam Taluk
Salem District.
3. The Taluk Surveyor
Pethanaickenpalayam Taluk
Salem District. .. Respondents
Prayer : Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the
order passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.34556 of 2022,
dated 22.12.2022.
For the Appellant : Mr.P.Jagadeesan
For the Respondents : Mr.P.Muthukumar
State Government Pleader
assisted by Mrs.R.Anitha
Special Government Pleader
for respondents 2 and 3
___________
Page 1 of 5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.No.2454 of 2023
JUDGMENT
(Delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
We have heard Mr.P.Jagadeesan, learned counsel for the
appellant; and Mr.P.Muthukumar, learned State Government
Pleader, assisted by Mrs.R.Anitha, learned Special Government
Pleader, for respondents 2 and 3.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the present
appellant was the third respondent in the writ petition filed by the
first respondent herein. The learned Single Judge, without issuing
notice to the appellant, had straight-away issued directions for
survey of the property.
3. According to learned counsel for the appellant, the original
writ petitioner did not have any right, title or interest in respect of
the subject writ property. The suit filed by the original writ
petitioner is dismissed for default. The suit filed by the present
___________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.2454 of 2023
appellant for declaration that the cancellation of the settlement is
illegal, with all other consequential reliefs, is pending adjudication.
A person who does not have title could not have sought for survey
of the land.
4. We have gone through the order passed by the learned
Single Judge. The learned Single Judge, under the impugned order,
has not decided the rights of the parties. The statement of learned
Government Advocate to the effect that after issuing notice to the
original writ petitioner and the appellant herein survey would be
conducted is recorded. The respondent authority is only required to
conduct a survey and nothing beyond that. Naturally, the decision
given by the civil court will be binding upon the revenue authorities
also. As no rights have been decided by learned Single Judge under
the impugned order, no further orders are required to be passed in
this appeal.
The writ appeal is disposed of accordingly. Needless to state
that all the contentions of the parties are kept open. There will be
___________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.2454 of 2023
no order as to costs. Consequently, C.M.P.No.20480 of 2023 is
closed.
(S.V.G., CJ.) (P.D.A., J.)
11.09.2023
Index : Yes/No
Neutral Citation : Yes/No
sasi
To:
1. The Tahsildar
Pethanaickenpalayam Taluk
Salem District.
2. The Taluk Surveyor
Pethanaickenpalayam Taluk
Salem District.
___________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.2454 of 2023
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND P.D.AUDIKESAVALU,J.
(sasi)
W.A.No.2454 of 2023
11.09.2023
___________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!