Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 13836 Mad
Judgement Date : 12 October, 2023
C.S.No.337 of 2001
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 12.10.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
C.S.No.337 of 2001
Kishore – Sons Detergent (P) Ltd.,
14-6-86, Chudi Bazar,
Hyderabad – 500 012. .. Plaintiff
-Vs.-
Lakshmi Venkateswara Industries,
Dupadu – 518 218 .. Defendant
PRAYER: Civil Suit is filed under order IV Rule 1 O.S. Rules, read with
Order VII Rule 1 of CPC read with Sections 105 & 106 of the Trade and
Merchandise Marks Act, 1958, praying for:-
(a) granting a permanent injunction restraining the defendant by
themselves, their servants, agents or anyone claiming through them from
manufacturing and selling and offering for sale using the offending trademark
as found in Document No.3 (EEL wrapper) in any colour or any other Trade
Mark which is in any way deceptively / phonetically similar to or a colourable
imitation of the trademark found in Plaintiffs registered Trade Mark
No.474088 filed as Document No.2 herein or infringing any of the essential
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.S.No.337 of 2001
feature of the trademark found in the registered trademark of the Plaintiffs or in
any manner infringing the plaintiffs registered Trade Mark No.474088 in class
3 for detergent cake.
(b) directing the defendant to render a true and faithful accounts of the
profits earned by them through the manufacture and sale of the offending
trademark Document No.3 and directing such profits to be paid to the Plaintiffs
by way of damages for the infringement and passing off committed by the
Defendant.
(c) directing the defendant to surrender to the Plaintiffs all the cartons,
labels and any other printed matter containing or consisting of the trademark
Document No.3 together with blocks used for the purpose of printing the same
for destruction.
(d) directing the defendants to pay to the Plaintiffs the costs of the suit.
For plaintiff : Ms.Gladys Daniel
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the plaintiff seeks permission of this Court to
withdraw the suit. However, she seeks liberty to the plaintiff to file a fresh suit
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S.No.337 of 2001
in the event of the defendant using the trademark of the plaintiff in the near
future. No prejudice would be caused if such a liberty is granted.
After recording the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the
plaintiff, this suit is dismissed as withdrawn. However, liberty is granted to the
plaintiff as prayed for. No costs.
12.10.2023
mac/rkm
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S.No.337 of 2001
ABDUL QUDDHOSE,J.
mac/rkm
C.S.No.337 of 2001
12.10.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!