Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

A.Sobha vs F.John Narchesan
2023 Latest Caselaw 13710 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 13710 Mad
Judgement Date : 10 October, 2023

Madras High Court
A.Sobha vs F.John Narchesan on 10 October, 2023
                                                                      C.R.P(MD)No.2085 of 2019




                      BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                             DATED: 10.10.2023

                                                   CORAM:

                           THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

                                         C.R.P(MD) No.2085 of 2019
                                                   and
                                        C.M.P(MD) No.10859 of 2019


                     A.Sobha                                                ...Petitioner


                                                      Vs.


                     F.John Narchesan                                       ...Respondent




                     PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the

                     Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated

                     09.08.2019 passed in E.A.No.5 of 2019 in E.P.No.110 of 2018 in

                     O.S.No.35 of 2017 on the file of the Principal District Judge,

                     Kanyakumari at Nagercoil.


                     1/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                      C.R.P(MD)No.2085 of 2019




                                  For Petitioner     : Mr.G.Thiruvarutselvan

                                  For Respondent : Mr.M.Kannan


                                                    ORDER

This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order

dated 09.08.2019 passed in E.A.No.5 of 2019 in E.P.No.110 of 2018

in O.S.No.35 of 2017 on the file of the Principal District Judge,

Kanyakumari at Nagercoil.

2. Heard, Mr.G.Thiruvarutselvan, learned counsel for the

petitioner and Mr.M.Kannan, learned counsel appearing for the

respondent and perused the material available on record.

3. The petitioner is the defendant in the suit and the

respondent is the plaintiff in the suit.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P(MD)No.2085 of 2019

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit

that the learned Principal District Judge, failed to consider that the

Execution Petition filed by the respondent only based on the ex-

parte order and the ex-parte order also challenged by the petitioner

by filing necessary application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act

and a petition to set aside the ex-parte order and those petitions are

still pending. When the said petitions are pending, without issuing

any notice or intimation to the petitioner with an intention to cheat

the petitioner, the respondent mentioned the wrong address of the

petitioner and cheated the trial Court and obtained ex-parte decree.

5. The learned counsel further submits that the

respondent approached the Court with unclean hands. The Lower

Court ought to have allowed the application to set aside the ex-parte

order, since the disputed property is the only dwelling house and the

petitioner is no other way to reside except the property.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P(MD)No.2085 of 2019

6. On the other hand, the learned counsel for the

respondent submits that the suit in O.S.No.35 of 2017 filed by the

respondent was decreed on 11.12.2017 and no appeal has been filed

against the said decree and it has become final. Subsequently, the

respondent filed Execution Petition. In the Execution Petition, the

petitioner was set ex-parte. Thereafter, the petitioner came up with a

petition to set aside the ex-parte order dated 11.07.2019. The

Execution Court holding that the reasons stated by the petitioner

therein are not satisfied to set aside the ex-parte order dated

11.07.2019, as the petitioner is not entitled for the relief sought in

the said petition, dismissed the E.A.No.5 of 2019, by order, dated

09.08.2019.

7. The learned counsel for the respondent further

submits that the Execution Court having considered all aspects

passed the order and interference of this Court under the Civil

Revision Petition is not warranted and sought to dismiss the Civil

Revision Petition.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P(MD)No.2085 of 2019

8. Having heard the submissions of the respective

counsels and upon careful perusal of the material available on

record, it is an admitted fact that the suit filed by respondent in

O.S.No.35 of 2017 on the file of the Principal District Judge,

Kanyakumar at Nagercoil, was decreed on 11.12.2017. At the time

of passing the decree, the Trial Court granted time to the defendant

i.e., the petitioner herein to hand over the possession of the petition

mentioned property to the plaintiff on or before 10.02.2018.

Admittedly, the decree has become final, as no appeal is filed.

Inspite of sufficient opportunity is granted to the petitioner, the

petitioner did not turn up. Accordingly, the petitioner was set ex-

parte on 30.06.2019 and ex-parte order was passed on 11.07.2019.

9. By following the judgment rendered by the Hon'ble

Apex Court in Ramaparameshwari Devi Vs. Nirmala Devi reported

in 2013 (3) LW - 97, wherein, the Apex Court held that deprecating

the dilatory tactics and the harassment of opposite party ultimately,

resulting in wastage of Court's time and also unjust benefit to the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P(MD)No.2085 of 2019

wrong doer under the existing system of administration of civil

litigation came down heavily to slap the exemplary cost of

Rs.2,00,000/-, the Execution Court came to an opinion that the Court

cannot shut its eyes to the deliberate and calculated strategies

designated by the petitioner to over reach the majesty of Courts and

the petitioner's ilk could not and should not be permitted to eat into

the precious judicial time of the Court, the Execution Court held that

the petitioner therein is not entitled for the relief and dismissed the

E.A.No.5 of 2019, by order, dated 09.08.2019.

10. The learned counsel for the respondent also brought

to the notice of this Court that the possession of the suit schedule

property is not handed over to the respondent till now.

11. On consideration of the facts and circumstances of

the case, it is clear that the petitioner is making every effort to drag

on the proceedings without permitting the respondent to enjoy the

fruits of the decree which is not permitted under law.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P(MD)No.2085 of 2019

12. In the considered opinion of this Court, the petitioner

failed to make out any case and failed to show sufficient reason

seeking interference of this Court in the Civil Revision Petition.

13. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is

dismissed.

14. No costs.

15. Consequently, connected Civil Miscellaneous

Petition is closed.




                                                                              10.10.2023
                     NCC          : Yes / No
                     Index        : Yes / No
                     Internet     : Yes / No
                     RM

                     To

                     The Principal District Judge,
                     Principal District Court,
                     Kanyakumari at Nagercoil.


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                         C.R.P(MD)No.2085 of 2019


                                      BATTU DEVANAND, J.




                                                            RM




                                  C.R.P(MD) No.2085 of 2019




                                                    10.10.2023





https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter