Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Chitra Avenue Flat Owners ... vs V.G.Selvaraja
2023 Latest Caselaw 13470 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 13470 Mad
Judgement Date : 4 October, 2023

Madras High Court
The Chitra Avenue Flat Owners ... vs V.G.Selvaraja on 4 October, 2023
                                                                                CRP. No.3004 of 2023




                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                  DATED: 04.10. 2023

                                                        CORAM:

                                   THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI

                                                 CRP No. 3004 of 2023
                                                & CMP No. 18553 of 2023

                     1.The Chitra Avenue Flat Owners Welfare Association
                       Represented by its Secretary S.Giridharan
                       No. 9, Choolaimedu High Road,
                       Chennai – 600 094.
                     2. S.Giridharan
                     3.V.Sathish

                                                        ...Petitioners/Petitioners/Defendants 2,4 & 6
                                                               Vs.
                     1.V.G.Selvaraja                   ...1 Respondent/1st Respondent/Plaintiff
                                                            st

                     2.The District Registrar
                       Chennai Central.
                     3.S.Linal Amalraj
                     4.Ramakrishnan
                     5.Muthuraman


                                      ...2 to 5 Respondents/2 to 5 Respondents/Defendants 1,3,5 &7

                     PRAYER : This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 227 of the
                     Constitution of India, praying to set aside the order passed by the VIII
                     Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai dated 04.08.2023 in I.A No. 7 of 2023

                     1

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                    CRP. No.3004 of 2023

                     in O.S No. 7042 of 2022, consequently reject the plaint in O.S No. 7042 of
                     2022 pending on the file of VIII Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai.
                                        For Petitioners   : Mr.Y.kajanavas

                                        For Respondents : Mr.S.kamadevan for R1



                                                             ORDER

This petition has been filed to set aside the order passed by the VIII

Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai dated 04.08.2023 in I.A No. 7 of 2023

in O.S No. 7042 of 2022, consequently reject the plaint in O.S No. 7042 of

2022 pending on the file of VIII Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioners/defendants submitted that

the petitioner filed I.A No. 7 of 2023 in O.S No. 7042 of 2022 before the

Trial Court to reject the plaint on the ground that the plaintiff/respondent

herein is not a member of the Chitra Avenue Flat Owners Welfare

Association hence he has no locus standi to file the suit. The said

application was strongly objected by the plaintiff/respondent herein by

filing objection stating that as a flat owner he is entitle to raise his objection

about violations while conducting the election and the same could not be

objected by the defendants'' as it is only remedy for him to approach the

Civil forum. Considering the submissions on either side the trial Court

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP. No.3004 of 2023

dismissed the said application holding that there is no prime facie materials

available on the side of the defendant to reject the plaint. Furthermore, after

filing of the written statement, issues were framed and P.W.1 was examined,

during cross examination of P.W.1 these defendants preferred this

application with an intention to drag on the proceedings. Moreover, the

election was held as per the direction of this Court in CRP proceedings

dated 28.07.2022, accordingly the election was conducted, if at all any

malpractice was happened in the election that can be elucidated only after

the Trial. Accordingly the said application was dismissed. Challenging the

same this Civil Revision petition was filed by the defendants.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the plaintiff

has no locus standi to dispute the election held by the second defendant as

he is not a member of the Association and also at any stage of the

proceedings he is entitle to file the petition to reject the plaint, to

substantiate his claim he relied the ratio laid down in the Judgment of this

Court in the case of Radhakrishnan Vs V.Sundaramoorthy:

5. Once an application is filed under Section Order 7 Rule 11 CPC,

the Court has to dispose the same before proceeding with the Trial. There is

no point or sense in proceeding with the trial of the case, in case the plaint

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP. No.3004 of 2023

(election petition in present case) is only to be rejected at at the threshold.

Therefore, the defendant is entitle to file the application for rejection before

filing his written statement..........

4. By way of reply, the learned counsel for the respondent submitted

that he is member of the flat owner association and he is having the right to

dispute the election results and the same can be established at the time of

the trial which was rightly appreciated by the Trial Court which needs no

interference.

5. Considering the submissions on either side and also on perusal of

records, it reveals that the suit was filed by the respondent for the relief of

permanent injunction and after receipt of notice the written statement was

filed by the petitioner by denying the averment in the plaint more

particularly with regard to locus standi of the plaintiff to dispute the

election. Moreover, in paragraph 4, 5, 6 of the written statement the

defendant raised allegations with regard to maintainability of the suit as well

as power of the society which are all defence already raised by the

defendant in the written statement. Based on the defendants' written

statement issues were framed and P.W.1 was examined and the matter is

pending for cross examination of P.W.1 at that stage the defendants filed

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP. No.3004 of 2023

application to reject the plaint as such is unsustainable which was rightly

appreciated by the Trial Judge. Further the defendants' claim is beyond the

scope of Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC, since because it cannot be decided merely

based on the allegations of the defendants. The main objection raised by

the defendants is that the plaintiff is not a candidate to the election so he has

no locus standi to file the suit but it this can be decided only by the Trial

Court. Therefore, the reason assigned by the Trial court is acceptable one

needs no interference. However, the liberty is granted to the defendants' to

put their defence before the Trial court. Further, the Trial Court is directed

to frame the issue properly more particularly with regard to locus standi of

the plaintiff.

6. In result, this petition is disposed of. No Cost. Consequentially,

connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

04.10.2023

pbl

Note : Issue order copy on 06.10.2023.

To The District Registrar Chennai Central.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP. No.3004 of 2023

T.V.THAMILSELVI,J.

Pbl

CRP No. 3004 of 2023 & CMP No. 18553 of 2023

04.10.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter