Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

R.R.Jeyaram Sundar vs The Commissioner
2023 Latest Caselaw 15465 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 15465 Mad
Judgement Date : 30 November, 2023

Madras High Court

R.R.Jeyaram Sundar vs The Commissioner on 30 November, 2023

Author: N.Anand Venkatesh

Bench: N.Anand Venkatesh

                                                                     W.P.(MD)Nos.11327 to 11331 of 2021


                           BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                DATED: 30.11.2023

                                                      CORAM

                            THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH

                                   W.P.(MD)Nos.11327 to 11331 of 2021
                                                    and
                      W.M.P.(MD)Nos.8842 to 8846, 8848, 8850, 8851, 8854 & 8856 of 2021

                     R.R.Jeyaram Sundar        ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.11327 of 2021
                     Gunasekaran               ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.11328 of 2021
                     Sukanya                   ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.11329 of 2021
                     G.Nallammal               ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.11330 of 2021
                     Suresh                    ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.11331 of 2021

                                                          vs.
                     The Commissioner,
                     Theni Allinagaram Municipality,
                     Theni.                ... Respondent in all cases

                     COMMON PRAYER: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the
                     Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorari, to call for records
                     to impugned Notification issued by the respondent in Na.Ka.No.
                     1362/2021/A3, dated 15.06.2021 and to quash the same as illegal.



                                  For Petitioner     :Mr.M.Mahaboob Athiff
                                  For Respondent     :G.Kaleeswaran
                                                                    (in all cases)
                                                       *****


                     1/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                            W.P.(MD)Nos.11327 to 11331 of 2021



                                                      COMMON ORDER

The subject matter of challenge in all these Writ Petitions pertains

to the impugned tender notification issued by the respondents, dated

15.06.2021.

2.When the matter came up for hearing on 08.07.2021, this Court

passed the following order:

“Mr.M.Lingadurai, learned Government Counsel, takes notice for the respondent.

2.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that even though the auction was slatted to be held, on 07.07.2021, the same has been postponed. The main ground that has been taken by the petitioners while challenging the Tender-cum-Public Auction is that the same is in violation of Rule 52-6 (A) of the Tamil Nadu District Municipalities Rules. To substantiate the same, reliance is placed upon the Division Bench Judgment of this Court in W.A.Nos.1489 and 1490 of 2003, dated 19.02.2008, which was subsequently followed in W.P.(MD).No.2065 of 2012, dated 10.09.2012. 3.The learned Government Counsel shall take instructions and report before this Court as to how the respondent is proceeding further with the Tender-cum-Public Auction without complying with the above said Rule. The learned Government Advocate shall also take instructions as to why G.O.Ms.No.92, Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department, dated 03.07.2007, has not been applied in the present case, while the petitioners have already made a representation seeking for renewal of the lease.

4.Post the matter after two weeks.

5.In the meantime, the respondents are directed not to proceed further with the tender.”

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)Nos.11327 to 11331 of 2021

3.When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned

Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent submitted that

the notification itself was withdrawn.

4.Recording the above, these Writ Petitions are disposed of. No

costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

                     Index             :Yes / No                           30.11.2023
                     Internet          :Yes / No
                     NCC               :Yes / No

                     cmr






https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                            W.P.(MD)Nos.11327 to 11331 of 2021


                                         N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.

                                                                         cmr




                                  W.P.(MD)Nos.11327 to 11331 of 2021




                                                               30.11.2023






https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter